Spatial heterogeneity and functional response: an experiment in microcosms with varying obstacle densities

UMR7625 Ecologie et Evolution, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Oecologia (Impact Factor: 3.25). 03/2010; 163(3):625-36. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1585-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Spatial heterogeneity of the environment has long been recognized as a major factor in ecological dynamics. Its role in predator-prey systems has been of particular interest, where it can affect interactions in two qualitatively different ways: by providing (1) refuges for the prey or (2) obstacles that interfere with the movements of both prey and predators. There have been relatively fewer studies of obstacles than refuges, especially studies on their effect on functional responses. By analogy with reaction-diffusion models for chemical systems in heterogeneous environments, we predict that obstacles are likely to reduce the encounter rate between individuals, leading to a lower attack rate (predator-prey encounters) and a lower interference rate (predator-predator encounters). Here, we test these predictions under controlled conditions using collembolans (springtails) as prey and mites as predators in microcosms. The effect of obstacle density on the functional response was investigated at the scales of individual behavior and of the population. As expected, we found that increasing obstacle density reduces the attack rate and predator interference. Our results show that obstacles, like refuges, can reduce the predation rate because obstacles decrease the attack rate. However, while refuges can increase predator dependence, we suggest that obstacles can decrease it by reducing the rate of encounters between predators. Because of their opposite effect on predator dependence, obstacles and refuges could modify in different ways the stability of predator-prey communities.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Predator-prey interactions are mediated by the structural complexity of habitats, but disentangling the many facets of structure that contribute to this mediation remains elusive. In a world replete with altered landscapes and biological invasions, determining how structure mediates the interactions between predators and novel prey will contribute to our understanding of invasions and predator-prey dynamics in general.Here, using simplified experimental arenas, we manipulate predator-free space, whilst holding surface area and volume constant, to quantify the effects on predator-prey interactions between two resident gammarid predators and an invasive prey, the Ponto-Caspian corophiid Chelicorophium curvispinum.Systematically increasing predator-free space alters the functional responses (the relationship between prey density and consumption rate) of the amphipod predators by reducing attack rates and lengthening handling times. Crucially, functional response shape also changes subtly from destabilising Type II towards stabilising Type III, such that small increases in predator-free space to result in significant reductions in prey consumption at low prey densities.Habitats with superficially similar structural complexity can have considerably divergent consequences for prey population stability in general and, particularly, for invasive prey establishing at low densities in novel habitats.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Functional Ecology 09/2014; · 4.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background/Question/Methods At the convergence of community, ecosystem and spatial ecology, the concept of metaecosystems considers a spatially structured environment in which species as well as inorganic nutrients and detritus can diffuse between localities. This new framework promises to be a powerful tool to address questions at large spatial scales for which feedbacks between nutrient dynamics and species communities are crucial for ecosystem functioning. Here we revisited the renowned paradox of enrichment within the metaecosystem framework. This paradox states that ecosystem enrichment could destabilize consumer-resource interactions instead of benefiting their demography. Species dispersal has been proved to dampen this enrichment destabilization in metacommunities. However, spatial flows of nutrient, detritus and local recycling could change local enrichment and potentially modify this outcome. We studied the effect of either nutrient, detritus, producer or consumer spatial flows, combined with changes of regional enrichment, on the stability of a two-patch metaecosystem model. Results/Conclusions We found first that spatial flows of nutrient and detritus are destabilizing whereas spatial flows of producers and consumers are either neutral or stabilizing. These opposite effects on stability are linked to opposite effects on spatial synchrony. We also found unexpected additional stabilizing effects of consumer spatial flows at intermediate diffusion rates, for higher enrichment. Furthermore, we found that consumer spatial flows could lead to different equilibriums in strongly enriched metaecosystems. Then, initial small changes in densities could result in radically divergent distributions of biomasses. Our metaecosystems' study reveals that nutrient spatial dynamics can produce complex interactions with species dynamics. Source-sink dynamics do not inevitably produce stabilizing compensatory effects, for instance when only nutrients can diffuse. However, the paradox of enrichment is unlikely to occur in well connected localities because it can be dampen by a global dispersal, which redistributes regionally the local excess of fertility. Stabilize the effects of a more global enrichment (regional scale) requires consumer spatial flows at intermediate dispersal rates. This points out the specific importance of consumers' dispersal to neutralize this paradox in nature.
    97th ESA Annual Convention 2012; 08/2012
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: dependent predation in a field experiment with wasps. Ecosphere 3(12): Abstract. The functional response is a key component of trophic interactions since it quantifies the per capita rate of prey consumption. Determining whether this rate depends on the prey density only (which is the standard assumption), on both prey and predator densities, or simply on their ratio is essential to understand interacting populations. Several experiments have convincingly demonstrated ratio depen-dence but, with very few exceptions, they were conducted in laboratory conditions. The difficulty of collecting the required data (initial prey density, prey consumption, predator density) probably explains the lack of evidence from functional responses observed in natural systems. A field experiment was previously conducted with a paper wasp and its prey, shield beetle larvae. Both densities were manipulated and the prey consumption was measured. A first analysis led to the conclusion that the functional response of the wasps depended on both prey and predator densities but could not be considered being ratio dependent. Here, we perform an improved analysis of these data, making better justified assumptions and using more appropriate statistical methods. We fit several functional response models to the data and select the best one with information-theoretic criteria. We also estimate the model parameters and their confidence intervals. This more reliable analysis significantly modifies the original conclusion. Both model selection and parameter estimation indicate that ratio dependence governs the functional response of paper wasps preying on shield beetles in the field. Therefore, ratio dependence is not a laboratory artefact and should be more systematically considered as a potential model for describing functional responses.
    Ecosphere 12/2012; art124. · 2.60 Impact Factor


Available from
May 30, 2014