Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: a case study in Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey.

Department of Geological Engineering, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (Impact Factor: 1.59). 03/2010; 173(1-4):533-54. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1403-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The appropriate site selection for waste disposal is one of the major problems in waste management. Also, many environmental, economical, and political considerations must be adhered to. In this study, landfill site selection is performed using the Geographic Information System (GIS), the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the remote sensing methods for the Senirkent-Uluborlu Basin. The basin is located in the Eğirdir Lake catchment area, which is one of the most important fresh water in Turkey. So, waste management must be regulated in the basin. For this aim, ten different criteria (lithology, surface water, aquifer, groundwater depth, land use, lineaments, aspect, elevation, slope, and distance to roads) are examined in relation to landfill site selection. Each criterion was identified and weighted using AHP. Then, each criterion is mapped using the GIS technique, and a suitability map is prepared by overlay analyses. The results indicate that 96.3% of the area in the basin is unsuitable; 1.6%, moderately suitable; and 2.1%, most suitable. Finally, suitable regions in the basin are determined for solid waste landfill disposal and checked in the field. The selected and investigated regions are considered to be suitable for the landfill.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The GIS-multicriteria decision analysis (GIS-MCDA) technique is increasingly used for landslide hazard mapping and zonation. It enables the integration of different data layers with different levels of uncertainty. In this study, three different GIS-MCDA methods were applied to landslide susceptibility mapping for the Urmia lake basin in northwest Iran. Nine landslide causal factors were used, whereby parameters were extracted from an associated spatial database. These factors were evaluated, and then, the respective factor weight and class weight were assigned to each of the associated factors. The landslide susceptibility maps were produced based on weighted overly techniques including analytic hierarchy process (AHP), weighted linear combination (WLC) and ordered weighted average (OWA). An existing inventory of known landslides within the case study area was compared with the resulting susceptibility maps. Respectively, Dempster-Shafer Theory was used to carry out uncertainty analysis of GIS-MCDA results. Result of research indicated the AHP performed best in the landslide susceptibility map-ping closely followed by the OWA method while the WLC method delivered significantly poorer results. The resulting figures are generally very high for this area, but it could be proved that the choice of method significantly influences the results.
    Natural Hazards 01/2013; 2013(65):2105 – 2128. · 1.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multicriteria spatial decision support systems (MC-SDSS) have emerged as an integration of geographical information systems (GIS) and multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods for incorporating conflicting objectives and decision makers' (DMs') preferences into spatial decision models. This article presents a raster-based MC-SDSS that combines the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and compromise programming methods, such as TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution) and Ideal Point Methods. To the best of our knowledge it is the first time that a synergy of AHP and compromise programming methods is implemented in raster-driven GIS-based landfill suitability analysis. This procedure is supported by a spatial decision support system (SDSS) that was developed within a widely used commercial GIS software package. A real case study in the Thrace region in northeast Greece serves as a guide on how to conduct a suitability analysis for a MSW landfill site with the proposed MC-SDSS. Moreover, the procedure for identifying MSW disposal sites is accomplished by performing four computational models for synthesizing the DMs per criterion preferential system. Based on the case study results, a comparison analysis is performed according to suitability index estimations. According to them Euclidean distance metric and TOPSIS present strong similarities. When compared with Euclidean distance metric, TOPSIS seems to generate results closer to that derived by Manhattan distance metric. The comparison of Chebychev distance metric with all the other approaches revealed the greatest deviations.
    Waste Management 02/2013; · 2.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the last few years, public awareness has been on the increase about short- and longterm effects of forest roads construction on the environment. Therefore, forest road managers have to be concerned about the negative impacts and mitigate them as much as possible. This research conducted multi-criteria analysis techniques in a useful way to define the effective criteria and propose a model for forest road network planning and assessment so that both economic and environmental costs are minimized. The model was used for evaluating the alternatives and a sensitivity analysis was then performed to verify the model. Results of sensitivity analysis showed that, there were two alternatives out of nine, with the lowest negative impacts. As a result, analytic hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis (AHP-SA) revealed that the criteria slope, soil texture and landslide susceptibility had the highest weight values, respectively, and the criteria soil texture and distance from stream networks and distance from faults were especially sensitive to the changes. In addition, the sensitivity analysis proved that the model proposed in our analysis was almost reliable and stable, and only the first and second priorities were replaced in priority levels when the weight values of criteria were changed. Results showed that the methodology was useful for identifying road networks that met environmental and cost considerations. Based on this work, the authors suggest future work in forest road planning using multi-criteria evaluation and decision making be considered in other regions and that the road planning criteria identified by the experts in this study can be useful.
    Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 01/2013; 15:781-792. · 0.69 Impact Factor


Available from
May 22, 2014