Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the effects of task demand context on facial affect appraisal in schizophrenia

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 7.37). 03/2010; 6(1):66-73. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsq018
Source: PubMed


Schizophrenia patients display impaired performance and brain activity during facial affect recognition. These impairments may reflect stimulus-driven perceptual decrements and evaluative processing abnormalities. We differentiated these two processes by contrasting responses to identical stimuli presented under different contexts. Seventeen healthy controls and 16 schizophrenia patients performed an fMRI facial affect detection task. Subjects identified an affective target presented amongst foils of differing emotions. We hypothesized that targeting affiliative emotions (happiness, sadness) would create a task demand context distinct from that generated when targeting threat emotions (anger, fear). We compared affiliative foil stimuli within a congruent affiliative context with identical stimuli presented in an incongruent threat context. Threat foils were analysed in the same manner. Controls activated right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)/ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) more to affiliative foils in threat contexts than to identical stimuli within affiliative contexts. Patients displayed reduced OFC/VLPFC activation to all foils, and no activation modulation by context. This lack of context modulation coincided with a 2-fold decrement in foil detection efficiency. Task demands produce contextual effects during facial affective processing in regions activated during affect evaluation. In schizophrenia, reduced modulation of OFC/VLPFC by context coupled with reduced behavioural efficiency suggests impaired ventral prefrontal control mechanisms that optimize affective appraisal.

Download full-text


Available from: Jeffrey N Valdez,
  • Source
    • "Overall, these differences may influence the observed patterns of neural activation. Support for this explanation comes from several lines of evidence: 1) findings of prefrontal cortex– amygdala modulation induced by linguistic vs. non-linguistic labelling of facial emotion in healthy participants (Hariri et al., 1999); 2) the widespread pattern of neurocognitive impairment in schizophrenia (Reichenberg and Harvey, 2007) and the range of cognitive processes recruited by the majority of facial emotion perception tasks (e.g., context processing, set shifting, working memory); 3) fMRI evidence of strategy use differences between schizophrenia patients and controls on tasks of facial emotion recognition (Fakra et al., 2008); and 4) direct evidence that the effects of context on emotional appraisal , driven by task demands, exert differential effects on neural activation in schizophrenia patients and controls (Leitman et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Deficits in facial emotion perception in schizophrenia may be a marker of disorder liability. Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies investigating these deficits have been limited by task demands that may recruit other impaired cognitive processes in schizophrenia. We used a family study design along with a passive viewing task during fMRI to investigate brain activation abnormalities underlying facial emotion perception in schizophrenia and examine whether such abnormalities are associated with the genetic liability to the disorder. Twenty-eight schizophrenia patients, 27 nonpsychotic relatives, and 27 community controls passively viewed images of facial emotions during an fMRI scan. Analyses revealed hypoactivation in face processing areas for both patients and relatives compared to controls, and hyperactivation in relatives compared to both patients and controls for frontal regions implicated in emotion processing. Results suggest that activation abnormalities during facial emotion perception are manifestations of the genetic liability to schizophrenia, and may be accompanied by compensatory mechanisms in relatives. Studying mechanisms in nonpsychotic relatives is a valuable way to examine effects of the unexpressed genetic liability to schizophrenia on the brain and behaviour. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Schizophrenia Research 07/2015; 168(1). DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2015.07.012 · 3.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "A meta-analysis of brain function during facial emotion perception tasks with any emotions demonstrates that patients with SZ, relative to control subjects, showed lower activation of superior frontal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus/amygdala and middle occipital gyrus (Li et al., 2010). In other fMRI studies, patients with SZ, compared to healthy subjects, showed blunted activation of right superior frontal gyrus during a facial valence discrimination task using sad faces (Li et al., 2012), lower activation of inferior frontal gyrus adjacent to orbitofrontal gyrus, anterior cingulate and cuneus during an emotional discrimination task using fear faces and inferior frontal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus and other areas during the task using angry faces (Habel et al., 2010) and blunted activation of orbitofrontal gyrus during a facial affect detection task using fear and anger faces as well as happy and sad faces (Leitman et al., 2011). The results of current study showing that patients with SZ showed blunted activation of superior frontal and orbitofrontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus in response to emotional facial stimuli, further support previous findings. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Patients with schizophrenia (SZ) have deficits of facial emotion processing and cognitive inhibition, but the brain pathophysiology underlying these deficits and their interaction are not clearly understood. We tested brain activity during an emotional face go/no-go task that requires rapid executive control affected by emotional stimuli in patients with SZ using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Methods: Twenty-five patients with SZ and 28 healthy control subjects were studied. We evaluated behavioral performance and used fNIRS to measure oxygenated hemoglobin concentration changes in fronto-temporal areas during the emotional go/no-go task with emotional and non-emotional blocks. Results: Patients with SZ made more errors and had longer reaction times in both test blocks compared with healthy subjects. Significantly greater activation in the inferior, superior, middle, and orbital frontal regions were observed in healthy subjects during the emotional go/no-go block compared to the non-emotional go/no-go block, but this difference was not observed in patients with SZ. Relative to healthy subjects, patients with SZ showed less activation in the superior and orbital frontal and middle temporal regions during the emotional go/no-go block. Discussion: Our results suggest that fronto-temporal dysfunction in patients with SZ is due to an interaction between abnormal processing of emotional facial expressions with negative valence and cognitive inhibition, especially during the rapid selection of rule-based associations that override automatic emotional response tendencies. They indicate that fronto-temporal dysfunction is involved in the pathophysiology of emotional-cognitive deficits in patients with SZ.
    Schizophrenia Research 01/2015; 162(1-3). DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2014.12.038 · 3.92 Impact Factor
    • "In a quantitative meta-analysis of brain activity in resting state, Kühn and Gallinat (2013) showed that rostral PFC (rPFC) was hypoactive in schizophrenia. While reduced activation in rPFC was found during tasks of divergent thinking (Takeshi et al., 2010), as well as facial affect appraisal (Leitman et al., 2011), hyperactivation in this area was also detected during executive functioning in patients with schizophrenia (Tan et al., 2006; Thormodsen et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Jumping to conclusions (JTC) is a probabilistic reasoning bias and is thought to contribute to delusion formation. Neurobiological correlates of the JTC bias are not known. We aimed to examine the rostral prefrontal cortex (rPFC) activity with functional near ınfrared spectroscopy during a modified version of the Beads in a Jar Task (BIJT) in subjects with persecutory delusions (N = 25). In BIJT participants are presented beads either drawn from one of the two jars with opposite probability ratios (PRs) of colored beads and are required to decide from which jar beads are being drawn.We administered the BIJT with 90/10 and 55/45 PRs. Compared to healthy controls (N = 20), patients reached a decision earlier in both conditions. While the medial rPFC regions were more active in the 90/10 condition in controls compared to patients, lateral rPFC activation was higher in the 55/45 condition in patients than controls. Only in the control group, there was a marked decline in the lateral rPFC activation in the 55/45 condition compared to the 90/10 condition. The activity in the lateral rPFC was negatively correlated with the amount of beads drawn in healthy controls but not in subjects with persecutory delusions. Our results suggest that during the BIJT, rPFC does not function as a single unit and rather consists of functional subunits that are organized differently in patients and controls. The failure to deactivate the lateral rPFC may be associated with earlier decisions in subjects with persecutory delusions.
    Schizophrenia Research 11/2014; 161(2-3). DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2014.11.011 · 3.92 Impact Factor
Show more