Article

Systematic review of prosthetic maintenance requirements for implant-supported overdentures.

CosmORAL Oral and Dental Health Polyclinics, Ankara, Turkey.
The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants (Impact Factor: 1.49). 01/2010; 25(1):163-80.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate prosthetic maintenance requirements for implant-retained/supported overdentures via a review of the literature.
Using the combined search terms "implant and overdenture," "implant-supported overdenture," "implant-retained overdenture," and "implant-anchored overdenture," along with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, eligible articles between 1997 and 2008 (up to April 1) were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, the Cochrane Library databases, and seven journals by hand-searching. The initial search yielded 3,120 titles, and 287 articles were assigned to full-text analysis. Upon classification of the prosthetic complications with regard to the jaws treated and the attachment systems used, within- and between-group comparative frequency analyses were undertaken with the Kruskal-Wallis test or the Mann-Whitney U test at P < .05.
A total of 49 articles were included. Within- and between-group evaluations with regard to jaw treated as well as the attachment systems used showed that the frequency of complications did not change over time (P > .05). The differences detected were more matrix replacements after 5 years in the maxilla and mandible and more matrix replacements and patrix fractures after the first year in the mandible (P < .05). Among the attachment systems, a dislodged, worn, or loose matrix or its respective housing was more common in the ball-attachment group after the first year (P < .05). Prosthetic complications for all types of attachments were comparable (P > .05), except for the differences in peri-implant or interabutment mucosal enlargement rates after 1 year.
Prosthetic maintenance requirements for overdentures on both jaws seem to be comparable. The impact of attachment system on the prosthetic outcome is negligible.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
66 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of interimplant divergence on retention of two Locator attachments before and after in vitro simulation of 3 to 5 years of use. A hydraulic universal testing machine was used to measure the retention of two blue Locator attachments during 5500 seating and unseating cycles. Ten pairs of Locators were tested with interimplant divergences of 0°, 10°, and 20°. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine surface changes of the components. The results were tested with ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc correction when normally distributed. Results that were not normally distributed were tested with Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA by ranks. At the start of the experiment the 10° group showed significantly more retention than the 0° group, but no significant difference was found between the 0° and 20° groups or the 10° and 20° groups. After 5500 cycles, there was no significant difference in retention between any of the groups. The SEM images showed an approximately equal amount of wear in the nylon patrix inserts from all the groups. The retention of Locator pairs was not impaired by interimplant divergence of up to 20°. Retention after 5500 removal cycles was less than the initial retention in all groups. The nylon Locator patrices showed wear defects of similar location, type, and magnitude in the SEM images, regardless of interimplant angulation.
    Journal of Prosthodontics 04/2014; · 0.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Implantat-retinierte Deckprothesen gehören zu den erfolgssicheren und etablierten Versorgungsformen im zahnlosen Kiefer. Neben anderen Verankerungselementen stellen insbesondere Stege klinisch langzeitbewährte Verankerungselemente dar. Die CAD/CAM-Fertigung von Suprakonstruktionen ermöglicht die Nutzung der bislang schwierig gusstechnisch zu verarbeitenden edelmetallfreien Werkstoffe. Vorteile der CAD/CAM-Fertigung sind neben der Verarbeitung eines porenfreien Ausgangsmaterials und der guten Passgenauigkeit vor allem die erweiterten Möglichkeiten eines virtuellen Designs, wodurch auch die Fertigung von komplexen Strukturen aus einem Monoblock möglich wird. Durch die Vermeidung von Fügeprozessen (Löten, Kleben, Schweißen) kann eine weitere Qualitätssteigerung im Vergleich zu konventionellen Fertigungsverfahren erreicht werden. Die CAD/CAM-Fertigung stellt somit eine Alternative zu traditionellen, auf der Edelmetall-Gusstechnik basierenden zahntechnischen Prozessen dar. Nach einer geringgradigen Modifikation der Arbeitsabläufe zwischen Praxis und Labor ist eine einfache Integration dieser Fertigungstechnologie möglich.
    Implantologie 01/2012; 20(1):65-74. · 0.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background/purposeGiven that many patients find the cost of mandibular rehabilitation through complete overdenture implants to be beyond their financial scope, many seek a more affordable treatment. The aims of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes of single mandibular implant-retained overdentures versus that of complete dentures.Materials and methodsThirteen edentulous patients with a mean age of 71 years were enrolled in this investigation. They were treated with a single implant inserted into the mandibular midline, followed by rehabilitation with complete dentures. The mandibular dentures were adhered with a locator or magnetic attachment after 10 weeks of adaptation. Patient satisfaction was assessed by means of a visual analogue scale(VAS) questionnaire both on the day of attachment connection and 3 months later. Chewing efficiency was assessed by a sieve test before and after connecting the attachment. Within-subject comparisons were performed either by using paired-sample t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to test patient satisfaction and chewing efficiency (P = 0.05).ResultsNo implants were lost nor were denture fracture found during the observation period. Significant improvements were observed in all parameters of patient satisfaction (with P values ranging from <0.001 to ∼0.043) after attachment of the mandibular dentures with a single midline implant. Furthermore, the objective chewing efficiency of patients significantly improved after implant connection (P<0.001).Conclusion Within the limitations of this preliminary prospective clinical study, single-implant-supported mandibular overdentures were a successful alternative treatment option for elderly edentulous patients.
    Journal of dental sciences 09/2012; 7(3):261–266. · 0.47 Impact Factor