Screening for Suicide Ideation among Older Primary Care Patients

Departments of Psychiatry and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada.
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.98). 03/2010; 23(2):260-9. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.080163
Source: PubMed


Older adults have high rates of suicide and typically seek care in primary medical practices. Older adults often do not directly or spontaneously report thoughts of suicide, which can impede suicide prevention efforts. Therefore, the use of additional approaches to suicide risk detection is needed, including the use of screening tools. The objective of this study was to assess whether brief screens for depression have acceptable operating characteristics in identifying suicide ideation among older primary care patients and to examine potential sex differences in the screen's accuracy.
We administered the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), which includes a 5-item GDS subscale (GDS-SI) designed to screen for suicide ideation, to a cross-sectional cohort of 626 primary care patients (235 men, 391 women) 65 years of age or older in the Northeastern United States. We assessed presence of suicide ideation with items from the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition.
Patients expressing suicide ideation (n = 69) scored higher on the GDS and GDS-SI than those who did not (n = 557). A GDS cut score of 4 maximized sensitivity (0.754) and specificity (0.815), producing an area under the curve of 0.844 (P < .001) and positive and negative predictive values of 0.335 and 0.964, respectively. Optimal cut scores were 5 for men and 3 for women. A GDS-SI cut score of 1 was optimal for the total sample and for both men and women.
The GDS and GDS-SI accurately identify older patients with suicide ideation. Research is needed to examine their acceptability and barriers to routine use in primary care.

8 Reads
  • Source

    The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 03/2010; 23(2):139-142. DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.100006 · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Suicide is one of the leading causes of death in the United States and is defined as intentional self-harm with the intent of causing death. Various mental disorders may be a cause for increased violence. This article outlines the elements of the risk assessment (for harm to self and/or others) in patients in crisis and addresses which contributing factors may be modifiable. This article also proposes a practical framework for the management of risk regarding suicide and violence.
    The Medical clinics of North America 11/2010; 94(6):1089-102. DOI:10.1016/j.mcna.2010.08.002 · 2.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effects of three antibiotics (erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole) on photosynthesis process of Selenastrum capricornutum were investigated by determining a battery of parameters including photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll fluorescence, Hill reaction, and ribulose-1.5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity, etc. The results indicated that three antibiotics could significantly inhibit the physiological progress including primary photochemistry, electron transport, photophosphorylation and carbon assimilation. Erythromycin could induce acute toxic effects at the concentration of 0.06 mg L(-1), while the same results were exhibited for ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole at higher than 1.0 mg L(-1). Erythromycin was considerably more toxic than ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole and may pose a higher potential risk to the aquatic ecosystem. Some indices like chlorophyll fluorescence, Mg(2+)-ATPase activity and RuBPCase activity showed a high specificity and sensitivity to the exposure of erythromycin, and may be potentially used as candidate biomarkers for the exposure of the macrolide antibiotics.
    Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 02/2011; 74(4):1027-35. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.01.022 · 2.76 Impact Factor
Show more


8 Reads
Available from