Domestic violence assessments in the child advocacy center.

Nationwide Children's Hospital, Center for Child and Family Advocacy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 655 East Livingston Avenue, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
Child abuse & neglect (Impact Factor: 2.34). 03/2010; 34(3):172-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.10.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study was designed to identify the frequency, methods, and practices of universal assessments for domestic violence (DV) within child advocacy centers (CACs) and determine which factors are associated with CACs that conduct universal DV assessments.
The study design was a cross-sectional, web-based survey distributed to executive directors of National Children's Alliance accredited or accreditation-eligible CACs.
Responses were received from 323 of 376 eligible CACs (86%). Twenty-nine percent of CAC directors report familiarity with current DV recommendations and 29% require annual education for staff regarding DV. Twenty-nine percent of CACs conduct "universal assessments" (defined as a CAC that assesses female caregivers for DV more than 75% of the time). The majority of CACs use face-to-face interviews to conduct assessments, often with children, family or friends present. The presence of on-site DV resources (OR=2.85, CI 1.25-6.50) and an annual DV educational requirement (OR=2.88, CI 1.31-6.32) are associated with assessment of female caregivers. The presence of on-site DV resources (OR=3.97, CI 2.21-7.14) is associated with universal assessments.
Many CAC directors are not aware of current DV recommendations and do not require annual DV training for staff. Less than one-third of CACs practice universal assessments and those that do often conduct DV assessments with methods and environments shown to be less comforting for the patient and less effective in victim identification. CACs are more likely to assess female caregivers if they have co-located DV resources and they require DV training of their staff. CACs are more likely to universally screen for DV if they have co-located DV resources.
The presence of DV in the home has significant potential to negatively impact a child's physical and mental health as well as the ability of the caregiver to adequately protect the child. Current practice in CACs suggests a knowledge gap in this area and this study identifies an opportunity to improve the services offered to these high-risk families.

26 Reads
  • Clinical Pediatrics 01/2004; 43(1):103-5. · 1.15 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the relative importance of wife abuse as a risk factor for physical child abuse, physical punishment, and verbal child abuse. The study explored the importance of wife abuse relative to blocks of parent, child, and family characteristics and also relative to specific risk factors. This study re-analyzed a sub-sample (N = 2,733) of data from the 1985 National Family Violence Survey. Hierarchical logistic regressions were conducted, using five different criterion variables measuring physical child abuse, physical punishment, and verbal abuse separately and in combination. Blocks of parent, child, and family characteristics were more important predictors of violence towards children than was wife abuse, though the presence of wife abuse in the home was a consistently significant specific risk factor for all forms of violence against children. Of specific risk factors, a respondent's history of having been hit as an adolescent was a larger risk factor for physical child abuse than was wife abuse. Wife abuse was an important predictor of physical punishment. Non-violent marital discord was a greater factor in predicting likelihood of verbal child abuse than was wife abuse. Though this study confirms the association between wife abuse and violence towards children, it cautions us not to overlook the contribution of other factors in our attempts to understand the increased risk attributed to wife abuse.
    Child Abuse & Neglect 12/2000; 24(11):1383-98. DOI:10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00194-0 · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To improve detection of domestic violence as a problem for women seeking primary care, we compared the addition of a single question about domestic violence on an existing self-administered health history form, to discretionary inquiry alone. We studied 689 consecutive new women patients in an internal medicine practice. Domestic violence identification rose from 0% in the control group with discretionary inquiry alone to 11.6% (95% confidence interval 8.8-14.4%) when the health history form included the following question: "At any time has a partner ever hit you, kicked you, or otherwise physically hurt you?" The addition of a single question can increase identification of domestic violence as a problem in patients' lives.
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 02/1996; 11(1):44-6. DOI:10.1007/BF02603485 · 3.45 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview (3 Sources)

26 Reads
Available from