Article

Quantitative loss of heterozygosity analysis for urothelial carcinoma detection and prognosis.

Service de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire Sud, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Chemin du Grand Revoyet, Pierre Bénite, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.
Urology (Impact Factor: 2.42). 03/2010; 76(2):515.e1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.046
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate loss of heterozygosity (LOH) using microsatellite polymorphism analysis as a diagnostic and prognostic marker at the time of transurethral resection and as a follow-up marker preceding cystoscopic evidence of recurrence compared with cytology.
A total of 127 urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients were included. Tumors were staged and graded according to the International Union Against Cancer-tumor, node, metastases system and to the 2004 World Health Organization classification. LOH urinalysis was performed using 8 markers and marker-specific LOH thresholds. Thirty control samples, obtained from healthy volunteers, were used to determine the positive cut-off for each marker.
LOH was significantly more sensitive than cytology in low-grade (64.8% vs 38.5%, P <.001) and low-stage UC (68.6% vs 45.5%, P <.001). The cumulative sensitivity of cytology and LOH reached 74.7% (P <.001) for low-grade and 80.2% (P <.001) for low-stage tumors. Both urinary LOH at TP53 and chromosome 9p markers were associated with an increased risk of recurrence (relative risk = 1.73 [1.30-2.31], P = .0002) and occurred more frequently in the initial urine samples of patients who later relapsed from primary tumors (36.4% vs 0.0%, P <.05 and 57.6% vs 15.8%, P = .0001). Among 32 relapse patients, LOH was positive alongside cystoscopy in 25 of 32 cases and tested positive before cystoscopy detected recurrence in a further 5 of 25 cases.
UC diagnosis and monitoring would greatly benefit from supplementing conventional cytology with LOH urinalysis, using a panel of 8 microsatellite markers with specific threshold levels. Given the limitations of both cystoscopy and cytology, novel molecular markers are needed for detection and follow-up of UC.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
86 Views
  • Value in Health 01/2005; 8(6). · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The assessment of risk of recurrence and progression of bladder cancer (BC) is still rather difficult. We decided to check the rates of the changes mentioned above in the group of the Polish patients after a year-long observation and next to compare them with the results calculated in the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables. The tested group consisted of 91 patients who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). When being diagnosed, 60 cases were in the pTa clinical stage, whereas 30 cases were in T1. The coexisting carcinoma in situ (CIS) was observed in four cases. On the basis of the scores obtained from the EORTC tables, the patients were divided into the groups of low, intermediate or high risk of disease recurrence and progression. Recurrence was noticed in 23 patients (25%), while progression was observed in 11 patients (12.1%). The rate of the observed recurrences proved to be lower than it had been predicted in all the groups, except for one of the intermediate-risk group (score 1- 4). Moreover, the rate of the progressions predicted according to the EORTC risk tables was higher in all the risk groups. It can be noticed that the rate of real recurrences is lower than expected, whereas the rate of the observed progressions is overestimated. Partly, it could be the result of using a relatively small group of patients for observation and applying a different method of treatment.
    Central European journal of urology. 01/2013; 66(1):14-20.

Full-text

View
10 Downloads
Available from
May 29, 2014