Serum transforming growth factor-beta 1 is not a robust biomarker of incident and progressive radiographic osteoarthritis at the hip and knee: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project

Department of Medicine, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (Impact Factor: 4.66). 02/2010; 18(6):825-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.02.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To test whether serum transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta1) predicts incident and progressive hip or knee radiographic OA (rOA).
Serum TGF-beta1 was measured for 330 participants aged 45 years and older in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project, with paired longitudinal films available for 618 hips and 658 knees. Incident and progressive rOA were defined using Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade as well as osteophyte (OST) and joint space narrowing (JSN) scores. Natural logarithm transformation was used to produce near-normal distributions for continuous TGF-beta1 (lnTGF-beta1). Separate multivariable Weibull regression models were used to provide hazard ratios (HRs) for a 1-unit increase lnTGF-beta1 with each rOA outcome, accounting for variable follow-up times and clustering by individual, adjusted for age, race, gender, and body mass index (BMI). Interaction terms were considered statistically significant at P<0.10.
The mean (+/-SD) age of the sample was 61.9+/-9.7 years, the mean BMI was 30.3+/-6.9 kg/m(2), with 60.6% women and 42.4% AA. The mean (+/-SD) TGF-beta1 was 17.8+/-6.1 ng/ml; follow-up time was 6.1+/-1.3 years. There were no significant interactions by race or gender. HRs showed no significant relationship between lnTGF-beta1 and incident or progressive rOA, OST, or JSN, at the knee or the hip.
Levels of TGF-beta1 do not predict incident or progressive rOA, OST, or JSN at the hip or knee in this longitudinal, population-based study, making it unlikely that TGF-beta1 will be a robust biomarker for rOA in future studies.

Download full-text


Available from: Yvonne M Golightly, Jul 03, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sex differences in the prevalence, incidence, and severity of osteoarthritis (OA) have long been known. Some differences in the evaluation of this issue across studies may be related to differences in study design, sampling, study size, study populations, targeted joint sites, and definitions of OA. This report highlights recent studies of sex differences in individual joint components imaged by magnetic resonance imaging and in systemic biomarkers of joint metabolism. Particularly important are those studies that examine this issue in young unaffected adults and children before the development of disease. Despite some variation across studies, women appear for the most part to have a thinner and more reduced volume of cartilage in the knee than men, and this may occur from early childhood. It is not clear whether women have a more accelerated rate of cartilage volume loss than men. Few data exist on sex differences in systemic biomarkers of joint metabolism. In these studies, it is critically important to characterize the total body burden of OA and the presence of comorbid conditions likely to influence a given biomarker. Lastly, future research should dovetail studies of sex differences in imaging and biochemical biomarkers with genetics to maximize insight into the mechanisms behind observed sex differences.
    Arthritis research & therapy 07/2010; 12(4):212. DOI:10.1186/ar3091 · 4.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly heterogeneous disease in terms of progression, establishment of prognostic biomarkers would be highly beneficial for treatment. The present study was performed to identify novel biomarkers capable of predicting the progression of knee OA. A total of 69 plasma samples (OA patients undergoing radiographic progression, n = 25; nonprogression, n = 33; healthy donors, n = 11) were analyzed by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS), and ion peaks of interest were identified by liquid chromatography and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-TOF MS. The identities of these proteins were further validated by immunoprecipitation combined with SELDI-TOF MS analysis. SELDI-TOF MS analysis indicated that the intensities of 3 ion peaks differed significantly between progressors and nonprogressors. Subsequent analyses indicated that these peaks corresponded to apolipoprotein C-I, C-III, and an N-terminal truncated form of transthyretin, respectively. The identities of these proteins were confirmed by the loss of ion peaks in SELDI-TOF MS spectra by immunoprecipitation using specific antibodies for the respective proteins. Three potential biomarkers were identified whose serum levels differed significantly between OA progressors and nonprogressors. These biomarkers are expected to be prognostic biomarkers for knee OA and to facilitate the development of novel disease-modifying treatments for OA.
    Biomarker insights 07/2013; 8:85-95. DOI:10.4137/BMI.S11966
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Innovations in biologics offer great promise in the treatment of patients with orthopaedic conditions and in advancing our ability to monitor underlying disease pathophysiology. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of hip osteoarthritis (OA) has improved significantly in the last decade. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia are increasingly recognized and treated as forms of prearthritic hip disease, yet the inability of radiographic and MR imaging to identify patients before the onset of irreversible articular cartilage injury limits their use for early diagnosis and treatment of patients with these conditions. Molecular biomarkers, as objectively measureable indicators of the pathophysiology of hip OA, have the potential to improve diagnosis, disease staging, and prognosis of hip OA and prearthritic hip disease. Although research into molecular biomarkers of hip OA has been conducted, investigations in prearthritic hip disease have only recently begun. The purpose of our review was to assess the use of molecular biomarkers in the pathophysiology of hip OA, including (1) diagnosis; (2) disease staging; and (3) prognosis. We additionally aimed to summarize the available literature investigating the use of biomarkers in (4) prearthritic hip disease, including FAI and hip dysplasia. We conducted a systematic review of molecular biomarkers associated with hip OA or prearthritic hip disease by searching four major electronic databases for keywords "hip", "osteoarthritis", "biomarker", and all synonyms. The search terms "femoroacetabular impingement" and "hip dysplasia" were also included. The biologic source of biomarkers was limited to serum, plasma, urine, and synovial fluid. The literature search yielded a total of 2740 results. Forty studies met all criteria and were included in our review. Studies were categorized regarding their relevance to (1) diagnosis; (2) disease staging; (3) prognosis; and/or (4) prearthritic hip disease. Biomarker studies were characterized as relevant to diagnosis (16 studies), disease staging (15 studies), prognosis (11 studies), and prearthritic hip disease (three studies). Sixteen different biomarkers demonstrated associations relevant to the diagnosis of hip OA, 16 biomarkers demonstrated similar associations for disease staging, and six for prognosis. Six biomarkers seemed to be the most promising, demonstrating associations with hip OA in multiple studies, including: urinary level of type II collagen telopeptide (n = 5 studies), serum cartilage oligomeric protein (n = 4 studies), and serum C-reactive protein (n = 4 studies). Only three studies investigated the role of biomarkers in prearthritic hip disease, including two in FAI and one in unspecified etiology of pain. There were no studies about biomarkers in hip dysplasia. Molecular biomarkers are increasingly investigated for their use in evaluating the pathophysiology of hip OA, but less so for prearthritic hip disease. Several biomarkers have demonstrated significant associations with hip OA across multiple studies. Further validation of these biomarkers is needed to assess their clinical use and potential application to prearthritic hip disease.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 01/2015; 473(5). DOI:10.1007/s11999-015-4148-6 · 2.88 Impact Factor