Article

U.S. provider reported folic acid or multivitamin ordering for non-pregnant women of childbearing age: NAMCS and NHAMCS, 2005-2006.

Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Maternal and Child Health Journal (Impact Factor: 2.24). 03/2010; 15(3):352-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-010-0587-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Folic acid use started prior to pregnancy confers a decreased risk of neural tube defects, and yet 20-50% of pregnancies are unplanned. We sought to determine whether medical providers order folic acid (FA) or folic acid-containing multivitamins (MVI) for their non-pregnant female patients of childbearing age. This is a cross-sectional study using data from the CDC's National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) (2005 and 2006). Among non-pregnant, female patients of childbearing age (15-44), the proportion of preventive visits during which a provider ordered FA/MVI supplements was determined and compared to pregnant patients. Next, the rates of FA/MVI orders were examined according to race/ethnicity, age, insurance status, region of the country, provider type, contraceptive care, income and education. Analyses were conducted using SAS-callable Sudaan to account for survey design and to obtain population estimates. There were 4,634 preventive visits for non-pregnant women of childbearing age, representing 32.1 million visits nationally. Of these visits, 7.2% included provider-ordered FA/MVI. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that provider-ordered FA/MVI was most common for women ages 30-34, who receive Medicaid, and whose race/ethnicity was other than White, Black or Hispanic. Preventive care visits represent an important venue for counseling regarding the benefits of FA for women of childbearing age, but appear to be under-utilized in all women. Our findings suggest that annually there may be over 29 million missed opportunities to recommend folic acid to non-pregnant women seeking preventive care.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
73 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The incidence of pregnancies affected with neural tube defects (NTDs) has been reduced by food fortification programs and public health campaigns promoting folic acid supplementation, but the incidence of NTDs in the USA has not achieved the full potential reduction expected with adequate periconceptional folate utilization. In seeking new ways to access sexually active women at risk for pregnancy, one option would be to link folic acid supplementation to contraceptive use. Since birth control pills are the most popular method of reversible contraception in the USA, it would seem quite logical to find a way to supplement them. To this end, a very efficient folate, levomefolate calcium salt (metafolin), has been added to drospirenone-containing oral contraceptives in equimolar concentrations to the recommended supplements of folic acid to reduce the risk for pregnancy and to reduce the risk of NTDs in pregnancies that occur while women are taking the pill or shortly after they discontinue its use. This article will focus on the need for such folate supplementation and will summarize the contraceptive and noncontraceptive benefits of the 30 µg EE/3 mg drospirenone pill (Yasmin(®), Bayer Healthcare, NJ, USA) to which has been added 451 metafolin (Safyral(®), Bayer Healthcare). The new information about thromboembolism risks associated with use of drospirenone-containing pills is also discussed.
    Women s Health 11/2012; 8(6):619-33. DOI:10.2217/whe.12.50
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Healthy diet, physical activity and appropriate weight gain during pregnancy contribute to healthy birth outcomes. The Institute of Medicine recommends that women receive counseling about diet and exercise during preconception, pregnancy and postpartum periods. We sought to determine how often healthcare providers report counseling women of childbearing age about diet or exercise and if such rates vary by pregnancy, overweight/obesity status or physician specialty. We combined the 2005-2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to obtain nationally representative estimates of outpatient preventive care visits for women of child-bearing age (15-44 years). Accounting for survey design, we compared proportions of preventive visits that included diet/exercise counseling for pregnant women versus non-pregnant women and performed multivariable logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios. Providers reported counseling pregnant women about diet/exercise during 17.9 % of preventive care visits compared to 22.6 % of visits for non-pregnant women (P < 0.01, adj. OR 0.8, 95 % CI 0.7, 1.0). Overweight/obese pregnant (vs. non-pregnant) women were significantly less likely to receive diet/exercise counseling (adj. OR 0.7, CI 0.5, 0.9) as were women seen by OB/GYNs versus non-OB/GYNs (adj. OR 0.4, CI 0.3, 0.5). Our findings suggest that provider-reported diet/exercise counseling rates during preventive care visits for women of childbearing age vary by overweight/obesity and pregnancy statuses, as well as by provider specialty. Our data suggest that there may be missed opportunities to provide diet/exercise counseling and that increasing rates of counseling could result in improved maternal and infant health outcomes.
    Maternal and Child Health Journal 12/2013; 18(7). DOI:10.1007/s10995-013-1401-z · 2.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the institution of mandatory folic acid fortification in the US, folate deficiencies still occur and are associated with an increased risk of several conditions. Since little is known regarding the relationship between folate status and other clinical, demographic, and healthcare-related characteristics, the objective of the study was to compare healthcare-related characteristics among US child-bearing age women with low vs normal red blood cell (RBC) folate levels. Data from the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were used to conduct a retrospective cohort study. Women (aged 18-45 when surveyed) were categorized in two cohorts for comparison: normal RBC folate level (≥ 140 ng/ml, NFL) and low RBC folate level (<140 ng/ml, LFL). Of the 2816 subjects, 5.9% were assigned to the LFL cohort and were significantly younger (28 vs 30 years, p=0.01); a greater proportion were 18-25 years old (55.7% vs 39.9%, p<0.001) or African-American (55.1% vs 22.3%, p<0.01). A lower proportion of LFL women were insured (67.3% vs 75.5%, p=0.01) with low rates of private insurance (39.5% vs 53.1%, p<0.01), while Medicaid/SCHIP coverage was similar (16.8% vs 15.1%, p=0.56). Predictors of low folate levels included aged 36-45 years (OR: 2.14 [95% CI: 1.04, 4.39]) and never being married (2.65 [1.34, 5.24]), while a household income ≥ $75,000 reduced the likelihood of having low folate levels (0.20 [0.06, 0.73]). The proportion of women with low folate levels was small, with the sample size limiting the ability to adjust for other factors during analysis. Medical histories were based on patient interviews and are subject to recall bias. LFL women are younger and have low rates of private insurance coverage compared to women with normal folate levels. Differences in age, marital status, and household income are associated with folate status.
    Journal of Medical Economics 03/2012; 15(5):807-16. DOI:10.3111/13696998.2012.680997