Article

Automated electron microscopy for evaluating two-dimensional crystallization of membrane proteins.

New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Journal of Structural Biology (Impact Factor: 3.37). 07/2010; 171(1):102-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.02.018
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Membrane proteins fulfill many important roles in the cell and represent the target for a large number of therapeutic drugs. Although structure determination of membrane proteins has become a major priority, it has proven to be technically challenging. Electron microscopy of two-dimensional (2D) crystals has the advantage of visualizing membrane proteins in their natural lipidic environment, but has been underutilized in recent structural genomics efforts. To improve the general applicability of electron crystallography, high-throughput methods are needed for screening large numbers of conditions for 2D crystallization, thereby increasing the chances of obtaining well ordered crystals and thus achieving atomic resolution. Previous reports describe devices for growing 2D crystals on a 96-well format. The current report describes a system for automated imaging of these screens with an electron microscope. Samples are inserted with a two-part robot: a SCARA robot for loading samples into the microscope holder, and a Cartesian robot for placing the holder into the electron microscope. A standard JEOL 1230 electron microscope was used, though a new tip was designed for the holder and a toggle switch controlling the airlock was rewired to allow robot control. A computer program for controlling the robots was integrated with the Leginon program, which provides a module for automated imaging of individual samples. The resulting images are uploaded into the Sesame laboratory information management system database where they are associated with other data relevant to the crystallization screen.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Martin Vink, Jul 02, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
128 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Electron crystallography is a powerful technique for the structure determination of membrane proteins as well as soluble proteins. Sample preparation for 2D membrane protein crystals is a crucial step, as proteins have to be prepared for electron microscopy at close to native conditions. In this review, we discuss the factors of sample preparation that are key to elucidating the atomic structure of membrane proteins using electron crystallography.
    Methods in enzymology 01/2010; 481:25-43. DOI:10.1016/S0076-6879(10)81001-8 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Throughout the history of single-particle electron microscopy (EM), automated technologies have seen varying degrees of emphasis and development, usually depending upon the contemporary demands of the field. We are currently faced with increasingly sophisticated devices for specimen preparation, vast increases in the size of collected data sets, comprehensive algorithms for image processing, sophisticated tools for quality assessment, and an influx of interested scientists from outside the field who might lack the skills of experienced microscopists. This situation places automated techniques in high demand. In this chapter, we provide a generic definition of and discuss some of the most important advances in automated approaches to specimen preparation, grid handling, robotic screening, microscope calibrations, data acquisition, image processing, and computational infrastructure. Each section describes the general problem and then provides examples of how that problem has been addressed through automation, highlighting available processing packages, and sometimes describing the particular approach at the National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy (NRAMM). We contrast the more familiar manual procedures with automated approaches, emphasizing breakthroughs as well as current limitations. Finally, we speculate on future directions and improvements in automated technologies. Our overall goal is to present automation as more than simply a tool to save time. Rather, we aim to illustrate that automation is a comprehensive and versatile strategy that can deliver biological information on an unprecedented scale beyond the scope available with classical manual approaches.
    Methods in enzymology 01/2010; 483:291-338. DOI:10.1016/S0076-6879(10)83015-0 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To automate electron microscopy tasks, the main challenge is to integrate image interpretation. This article presents a first achievement in the domain of electron microscopy. ANalysis of IMages for Automatic Targeting and Extraction of Data in Transmission Electron Microscopy (ANIMATED-TEM) is a software toolbox composed of a set of image analysis algorithms and an examination scenario. Combined with microscope software, it runs all the microscope tasks and manages the exploration strategy of the carbon-coated grids on which the sample of interest (viruses, proteins, bi-dimensional crystal of membrane proteins, etc.) has been deposited. ANIMATED-TEM realizes the automatic examination of biological samples, working at several magnifications without human intervention. Online image analysis of micrographs is an essential part both to extract characteristic data and to manage automation, as interesting regions need to be identified to trigger new acquisitions at higher magnifications. This toolbox has been developed to perform high-throughput screening of 2D-crystallization experiments. It is operational on a microscope equipped with an automatic grid loading system, allowing the continuous and automatic analysis of up to 96 samples. Intensive testing over a period of several months confirms that ANIMATED-TEM achieves full automation with an efficient target selection and in a suitable computational time. KeywordsAutomated image acquisition–Transmission electron microscope–Target selection–Specimen characterization–Fully automated electron microscope
    Machine Vision and Applications 01/2012; 23(4):1-21. DOI:10.1007/s00138-011-0357-5 · 1.44 Impact Factor