Brief Report: Telephone Administration of the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: Reliability and Suitability for Use in Research

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7M 8A6, Canada.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.06). 03/2010; 40(10):1285-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-010-0987-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Autism Diagnostic Interview--revised is one of the "gold standard" diagnostic tools for autism spectrum disorders. It is traditionally administered face-to-face. Cost and geographical concerns constrain the employment of the ADI-R for large-scale research projects. The telephone interview is a reasonable alternative, but has not yet been examined for reliability with face-to-face administration. In this study, participants were interviewed both face-to-face and on the telephone using the complete ADI-R interview. Results indicate that there was no significant difference between the algorithm scores or the diagnoses arrived at for face-to-face and telephone administrations. Reliability statistics across the two modalities were very good and indicate that telephone interviews using the ADI-R are a viable option for researchers.


Available from: Ira L Cohen, Mar 12, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A large number of studies have reported on the validity of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening procedures. An overall understanding of these studies' findings cannot be based solely on the level of internal validity of each, since screening instruments might perform differently according to certain factors in different settings. Europe has led the field with the development of the first screening tool and first prospective screening study of autism. This paper seeks to provide an overview of ASD screening studies and ongoing programmes across Europe, and identify variables that have influenced the outcomes of such studies. Results show that, to date, over 70,000 children have been screened in Europe using 18 different screening procedures. Differences among findings across studies have enabled us to identify ten factors that may influence screening results. Although it is impossible to draw firm conclusions as to which screening procedure is most effective, this analysis might facilitate the choice of a screening method that best fits a specific scenario, and this, in turn, may eventually improve early ASD detection procedures.
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 06/2014; 23(11). DOI:10.1007/s00787-014-0555-6 · 3.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is known to be heritable, patterns of inheritance of subclinical autistic traits in nonclinical samples are poorly understood.
    JAMA Psychiatry 08/2014; 71(8):936-42. DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.476 · 12.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Early detection of autism has clear positive effects on prognosis, but a significant delay in obtaining an ASD diagnosis is found in Spain. For these reasons the University of Salamanca and the Institute of Health Carlos III carried out the Spanish validation of MCHAT and developed a population based screening for ASD in the public Health. Objectives: * To check out if the population screening for ASD can work in the public Health System. * To instruct paediatricians of Primary Care Services, and to improve their awareness about ASD. * To improve coordination among health, social, and educational services. * To reduce the delay in the detection, diagnosis procedure, and treatment for children with ASD, and to reduce the family stress. * To estimate the incidence of ASD in the studied population Methods: Period: From September 2005 to December 2008 Place: Provinces of Salamanca and Zamora ( Spain) Population: 12.952 children in Salamanca and 5.761 children in Zamora that come up one of the to two compulsory paediatricians visits: vaccination at 18months and general follow-up at 24months. Procedure: 1. Handing over of the MCHAT questionnaire and the informed consent to the families when they attend to the paediatrician with a child 18 months and 24 months old. 2. Telephone interview in positive cases following the flow-chart format for exploration of each failed item (Robins, 2001). 3. Referral to the Childhood Unit of the University of Salamanca for a specialised evaluation of the confirmed positives cases (ADOS-G, ADI-R, MERRIL PALMER –R, VINELAND). 4. Search of “false negatives” through a randomized sampling selection of negative cases. A telephone interview exploring each DSM-IV-TR criteria for Autistic Disorder was carried out for each selected child. 5. Referral to the public Early Intervention Program of those cases finally diagnosed with ASD, SLI, developmental delays, etc. Results: Global response rate (total of children): 5726/18713=30.59% Total questionnaires received: 5726 (1827 at 18 months visit in Salamanca and 1281 at 18 months visit in Zamora; and 1504 at 24 months visit in Salamanca and 1114 at 24 months visit in Zamora). Response rate in Salamanca = 3331/12952 (25.71%) Response rate in Zamora = 2395/5761 (41.57%) Positive cases in the questionnaire that follows to the second step of the telephone interview=794 Positive cases confirmed after telephone interview =35 Evaluated cases=35 1. Salamanca cases: ASD=5; SLI=3; Developmental delay=11; False positive=5. 2. Zamora cases: ASD=4; SLI=2; Global developmental delay=5) Prevalence: 1.6 per 1000 Conclusions: The population screening program for ASD, using the Spanish version of MCHAT, showed that services coordination is possible. Also it is proved that a reduction of diagnosis delay in the public health system is possible. The study gives support that paediatricians can be involved in a detection program if they have available information and reliable resources. Nevertheless, we must to have into account the limits of our results, due to the low participation rate, and the high number of positive cases in the questionnaire, prior to the phone interview. These aspects suggest that a reform in the screening program could be necessary.
    International Meeting for Autism Research 2009; 05/2009