Hostility May Explain the Association between Depressive Mood and Mortality: Evidence from the French GAZEL Cohort Study

Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of C-L Psychiatry, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (Impact Factor: 9.2). 02/2010; 79(3):164-71. DOI: 10.1159/000286961
Source: PubMed


Depressive mood is associated with mortality. Because personality has been found to be associated with depression and mortality as well, we aimed to test whether depressive mood could predict mortality when adjusting for several measures of personality.
20,625 employees of the French national gas and electricity companies gave consent to enter in the GAZEL cohort in 1989. Questionnaires were mailed in 1993 to assess depressive mood, type A behavior pattern, hostility, and the six personality types proposed by Grossarth-Maticek and Eysenck. Vital status and date of death were obtained annually for all participants. The association between psychological variables and mortality was measured by the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) computed through Cox regression.
14,356 members of the GAZEL cohort (10,916 men, mean age: 49 years; 3,965 women, mean age: 46 years) completed the depressive mood scale and at least one personality scale. During a mean follow-up of 14.8 years, 687 participants had died. Depressive mood predicted mortality, even after adjustment for age, sex, education level, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and smoking [RII (95% CI) = 1.56 (1.16-2.11)]. However, this association was dramatically reduced (RII reduction: 78.9%) after further adjustment for cognitive hostility (i.e. hostile thoughts) [RII (95% CI) = 1.12 (0.80-1.57)]. Cognitive hostility was the only personality measure remaining associated with mortality after adjustment for depressive mood [RII (95% CI) = 1.97 (1.39-2.77)].
Cognitive hostility may either confound or mediate the association between depressive mood and mortality.

Download full-text


Available from: Cédric Lemogne, Mar 19, 2014
  • Source
    • "Besides type A personality, hostility and neuroticism have been associated with higher mortality in longitudinal studies. Hostility and chronic anger were described as risk factors for cardiovascular disease and premature mortality [4,5]. However, results of studies concerning neuroticism as a predictor for mortality were inconsistent [6-11]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The question of whether personality traits influence health has long been a focus for research and discussion. Therefore, this study was undertaken to examine possible associations between personality traits and mortality in women. A population-based sample of women aged 38, 46, 50 and 54years at initial examination in 1968-69 was followed over the course of 40years. At baseline, 589 women completed the Cesarec-Marke Personality Schedule (the Swedish version of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule) and the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Associations between personality traits and mortality were tested using Cox proportional hazards models. No linear associations between personality traits or factor indices and mortality were found. When comparing the lowest (Q1) and highest quartile (Q4) against the two middle quartiles (Q2 + Q3), the personality trait Succorance Q1 versus Q2 + Q3 showed hazard ratio (HR) = 1.37 (confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.74), and for the factor index Aggressive non-conformance, both the lowest and highest quartiles had a significantly higher risk of death compared to Q2 + Q3: for Q1 HR = 1.32 (CI = 1.03-1.68) and for Q4 HR = 1.36 (CI = 1.06-1.77). Neither Neuroticism nor Extraversion predicted total mortality. Personality traits did not influence long term mortality in this population sample of women followed for 40years from mid- to late life. One explanation may be that personality in women becomes more circumscribed due to the social constraints generated by the role of women in society.
    BMC Women's Health 04/2014; 14(1):61. DOI:10.1186/1472-6874-14-61 · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The GAZEL Cohort Study was set up in 1989 among Électricité de France-Gaz de France (EDF-GDF) workers. It is an open epidemiologic laboratory characterized by a broad coverage of health problems and determinants and accessible to the community of researchers. At inception in 1989, the GAZEL Cohort Study included 20 625 volunteers working at EDF-GDF then aged from 35 to 50 years (15 011 men and 5614 women). The cohort is broadly diverse in terms of social, economic, and occupational status, health, and health-related behavior. The data collected routinely cover diverse dimensions and come from different sources: annual self-administered questionnaire (morbidity, lifestyles, life events, etc.); personnel department of EDF-GDF for social, demographic, and occupational characteristics; EDF-GDF special social insurance fund (for sickness absences and cancer and ischemic heart disease registries), occupational medicine (occupational exposure and working conditions), Social Action Fund (healthcare utilization), Health Screening Centers for standardized health examination and the constitution of a biobank, and the National Death Register (causes of death). Follow-up has been excellent, and the number of subjects lost to follow-up was exceptionally low; active participation by the self-administered questionnaire is also elevated. Today, more than 40 projects on diversified themes have been set up in the GAZEL Cohort Study by some 30 French and foreign teams. Different health problems taking into account behavioral, social, psychological and medical occupational risk factors have been the object of research projects in the cohort. A substantial proportion of the research work has focused on social inequalities in health. Here, we present a brief panorama of the main fields covered by research in the GAZEL Cohort Study that have already been published over the years.
    Advances in Life Course Research 12/2009; 14(4). DOI:10.1016/j.alcr.2010.02.003 · 1.35 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The author addresses three key issues concerning the state of art and the future of consultation-liaison psychiatry. In the context of medico-economic constraints, it is important both to be provided with epidemiological arguments on the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in medically ill and their impact on health and sanitary costs, and to seize the opportunity to upgrade consultation-liaison psychiatry, especially through correctly coding of discharge summaries, taking into account such comorbidities, given their impact on hospital receipts. Screening for depressive disorder in medicine remains a priority for consultation-liaison psychiatry. Epidemiology has consistently shown the prognostic value of such symptoms, especially in the cardiovascular field. The relationship between depressive symptoms and cognitive hostility deserve to be better taken into account and can guide the type of follow-up. A growing literature has been devoted to the links between alexithymia, emotional awareness, somatic vulnerability. Several examples are given of the operational nature of these concepts, based on experimental studies, and paths are suggested that open to better understand the links between alexithymia and empathic ability of the patient, but also between empathic ability of the caregiver and therapeutic alliance. These concepts, which refer more to medical psychology than to psychiatric nosography, make the richness of the field of consultation-liaison psychiatry.
    Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique 04/2010; 168(3):198-204. DOI:10.1016/j.amp.2010.02.009 · 0.22 Impact Factor
Show more