Association of Diabetes, Comorbidities, and A1C With Functional Disability in Older Adults Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999–2006

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. .
Diabetes care (Impact Factor: 8.57). 02/2010; 33(5):1055-60. DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1597
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the relationship of diabetes and functional disability in older adults and the possible mediating roles of comorbidities and A1C.
We analyzed data from a nationally representative sample of 6,097 participants aged >or=60 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2006. Diabetes was defined by self-report. Disability was defined as difficulty performing a physical task. We evaluated disability by grouping 19 physical tasks into five functional groups: lower-extremity mobility (LEM), general physical activities (GPA), activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and leisure and social activities (LSA).
Older U.S. adults with diabetes had the greatest disability in GPA (prevalence 73.6% [95% CI 70.2-76.9]), followed by LEM (52.2% [48.5-55.9]), IADL (43.6% [40.1-47.2]), ADL (37.2% [33.1-41.3]), and LSA groups (33.8% [30.8-36.9]). Diabetes was associated with two to three times increased odds of disability across functional groups (all P < 0.05). Comorbidities, mostly cardiovascular disease and obesity, and poor glycemic control (A1C >or=8%) together explained up to 85% of the excess odds of disability associated with diabetes, whereas poor glycemic control alone explained only approximately 10% of the excess odds. Adjustment for comorbidities, A1C, and diabetes duration fully attenuated the associations of diabetes with disability in all functional groups (all P > 0.05).
Older adults with diabetes have a high prevalence of disabilities with variable associations attributable to comorbidities and A1C. Aggressive management of cardiovascular risk factors and obesity may significantly reduce the burden of disability in this population.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Today's information technology undergoes dramatic mass changes due to urgent requirements like the Year 2000 problem, the European currency union and emerging technologies like the World Wide Web. Many older industrial database applications do not meet these requirements. Often, such legacy databases (LDB) have evolved over several generations of programmers and lack a sufficient technical documentation. However, this documentation is a prerequisite to migrate LDBs to new technologies. Recovering this documentation is a complex task that requires a high amount of expert knowledge and coordination. Computer-aided reverse engineering (CARE) tools have a great potential to reduce this complexity. Still, a practical limitation of current CARE tools is their lack of customizability. In most cases, reverse engineering (RE) knowledge is hardly adaptable, because it has been implemented in general-purpose programming languages. We outline an approach that overcomes this limitation. We introduce a dedicated formalism to specify uncertain RE knowledge. Furthermore, we adapt the backpropagation algorithm to obtain a CARE tool that automatically adjusts the confidences of the implemented RE knowledge to its current application context
    Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 1999. NAFIPS. 18th International Conference of the North American; 08/1999
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: New clinical practice recommendations include A1C as an alternative to fasting glucose as a diagnostic test for identifying pre-diabetes. The impact of these new recommendations on the diagnosis of pre-diabetes is unknown. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2006 (n = 7,029) were analyzed to determine the percentage and number of U.S. adults without diabetes classified as having pre-diabetes by the elevated A1C (5.7-6.4%) and by the impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (fasting glucose 100-125 mg/dl) criterion separately. Test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) using IFG as the reference standard were calculated. The prevalence of pre-diabetes among U.S. adults was 12.6% by the A1C criterion and 28.2% by the fasting glucose criterion. Only 7.7% of U.S. adults, reflecting 61 and 27% of those with pre-diabetes by A1C and fasting glucose, respectively, had pre-diabetes according to both definitions. A1C used alone would reclassify 37.6 million Americans with IFG to not having pre-diabetes and 8.9 million without IFG to having pre-diabetes (46.5 million reclassified). Using IFG as the reference standard, pre-diabetes by the A1C criterion has 27% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 61% positive predictive value, and 77% negative predictive value. Using A1C as the pre-diabetes criterion would reclassify the pre-diabetes diagnosis of nearly 50 million Americans. It is imperative that clinicians and health systems understand the differences and similarities in using A1C or IFG in diagnosis of pre-diabetes.
    Diabetes care 10/2010; 33(10):2190-5. DOI:10.2337/dc10-0752 · 8.57 Impact Factor
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 01/2011; 12(1):9-11. DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2010.08.016 · 4.78 Impact Factor
Show more


1 Download
Available from