Socioeconomic Position and Inflammatory and Immune Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease: Applications to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics

Department of Epidemiology, Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Biodemography and Social Biology (Impact Factor: 1.37). 12/2009; 55(2):178-205. DOI: 10.1080/19485560903382304
Source: PubMed


Biomarkers are an important aspect of research linking psychosocial stress and health. This article aims to characterize the biological pathways that may mediate the relationship between socioeconomic position (SEP) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and address opportunities for further research within the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), with a focus on psychosocial stressors related to SEP. We review the literature on CVD biomarkers, including adhesion and proinflammatory molecules (interleukin-6, other cytokines, C-reactive proteins, fibrinogen, etc.) and microbial pathogens. The impact of socioeconomic determinants and related psychosocial stressors on CVD biomarkers mediated by behavioral and central nervous system pathways are described. We also address measurement and feasibility issues, including specimen collection methods, processing and storage procedures, laboratory error, and within-person variability. In conclusion, we suggest that PSID consider adding important assessments of specific CVD biomarkers and mediating behavioral measures, health, and medications that will ultimately address many of the gaps in the literature regarding the relationship between SEP and cardiovascular health.

Download full-text


Available from: George A Kaplan, Oct 08, 2015
8 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a reliable correlate of poor physical health. Rather than treat SES as a covariate, health psychology has increasingly focused on the psychobiological pathways that inform understanding why SES is related to physical health. This review assesses the status of research that has examined stress and its associated distress, and social and personal resources as pathways. It highlights work on biomarkers and biological pathways related to SES that can serve as intermediate outcomes in future studies. Recent emphasis on the accumulation of psychobiological risks across the life course is summarized and represents an important direction for future research. Studies that test pathways from SES to candidate psychosocial pathways to health outcomes are few in number but promising. Future research should test integrated models rather than taking piecemeal approaches to evidence. Much work remains to be done, but the questions are of great health significance.
    Annual Review of Psychology 01/2011; 62(1):501-30. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130711 · 21.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research suggests that adverse experiences in childhood affect the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and immune and inflammation dysregulation has been postulated to play role. However, it is unclear whether the effects of social adversity on immune-related biomarkers are evident in early life, and if these biomarkers may provide an early risk marker for targeting prevention and intervention. The purpose of this review is to evaluate research on the relationship between adversity and CVD-relevant immune biomarkers in youth, assess the consistency of the findings, and consider what additional research is needed. PubMed and PsycINFO searches were conducted through September 2011. Studies were selected using criteria related to the childhood exposure, biomarker outcome, age range, and sample selection. Twenty articles were identified, examining associations between childhood adversity and immune biomarkers (assessed during childhood) that are potential risk markers for CVD later in life. Although childhood adversity was not consistently related to youth levels of inflammatory and other immune markers relevant to CVD, a trend toward positive findings was observed. No detectable patterns were evident based on measure of adversity, biomarker, study design, or sample size. Overall, our findings suggest this avenue of research is worth continued investigation. We offer recommendations for future research related to (1) study design and sample, (2) definition and measurement of adversity, (3) statistical analysis, and (4) outcomes that will help distinguish whether there are immunologic alterations related to adversity and subsequent CVD risk that can be reliably detected in childhood.
    Brain Behavior and Immunity 11/2011; 26(2):239-50. DOI:10.1016/j.bbi.2011.11.003 · 5.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a blood marker of inflammation and a hallmark of the acute-phase response. Its elevation bears negative prognostic implications for many conditions and it has also been shown to be a nonspecific predictor of long-term risk of cerebrovascular disease (CVD) in several populations, while elevations of CRP associated with the major acute-phase response following ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke are associated with death and vascular complications. High-sensitivity assays that accurately measure levels of CRP have been proposed for use in risk assessment for CVD and as a prognostic marker after an acute event, although the pathogenic and clinical significance of these associations is controversial. In this article, we critically review the literature in narrative format and describe major epidemiological studies, novel experiments and possible future developments that may inform the debate. In our discussion, we will distinguish the different pathophysiological roles of high circulating CRP concentrations in individuals with acute stroke from the modestly and persistently increased levels of CRP concentration in generally healthy subjects. However, before any clinical application is possible, a critical appraisal of the strengths and deficiencies of the accumulated evidence is required, both to consider the current state of knowledge and to inform the design of future research.
    Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 12/2011; 9(12):1565-84. DOI:10.1586/erc.11.159
Show more