Donor-Derived Second Hematologic Malignancies after Cord Blood Transplantation

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation: journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (Impact Factor: 3.35). 02/2010; 16(7):1025-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.02.014
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Double umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen is an effective strategy for adult patients without a matched donor. The risk of second malignancies in these patients has not yet been established, however. In the present study, 98 adults with a hematologic malignancy underwent double UCBT. Seventy patients received a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen of fludarabine 30 mg/m(2)/day for 6 days, melphalan 100 mg/m(2)/day for 1 day, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin 1.5 mg/kg/day for 4 days, and 28 patients received a myeloablative total body radiation-containing conditioning regimen. Sixty-three patients received sirolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and 35 patients received non-sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis. The median patient age was 48 years (range, 19-67 years). Eighteen patients developed a second malignancy at a median of 134 days after transplantation. Sixteen patients had lymphoma, and 2 patients had myelodysplasic syndrome/myeloproliferative disorder (MDS/MPD). Sixteen of these second malignancies (both cases of MDS/MPD and 14 of the lymphomas) were donor-derived; the origins of the others were not determined. GVHD prophylaxis, HLA matching, primary disease, age, total nucleated cell dose, and CD34(+) cell dose were not associated with a higher rate of second malignancy. Second myelogenous malignancies of donor origin occur after double UCBT, suggesting that a search for donor origin should be performed in all patients with suspected relapse.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Availability of an HLA-identical sibling (MRD) or suitably matched unrelated donor (MUD) has historically been a limiting factor in the application of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Although almost all patients have an HLA-haploidentical family donor, prior attempts at transplantation from such donors using T-cell replete grafts and conventional immunosuppression were associated with unacceptable rates of GVHD, and when stringent ex vivo T-cell depletion was used to control GVHD, rates of graft rejection and post-transplant infections were prohibitive. The recent approach to HLA-haploidentical donor transplantation developed in Baltimore that uses T-cell replete grafts and post-transplant CY (Haplo-post-HCT-CY) to control post-transplant allo-reactivity appears to have overcome many of the obstacles historically associated with haploidentical donor transplantation. In particular, TRM rates of <10% are usual and rapid reconstitution of immunity leads to a low rate of post-transplant infections and no post-tranplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD), consistent with the hypothesis that post-transplant CY selectively depletes proliferating alloreactive T cells responsible for GVHD and graft rejection while preserving resting memory T cells essential for post-transplant immunologic recovery. In parallel trials using similar non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, Haplo-post-HCT-CY produced similar overall survival to double umbilical cord blood transplantation(DUCBT) in adult patients (62% vs 54%), with low rates of TRM (7% vs 24%), severe acute GVHD (0% vs 21%) and chronic GVHD (13% vs 25%). Furthermore, recent non-randomized comparisons adjusted for risk factors show that Haplo-post-HCT-CY achieve at least equivalent outcomes to conventional MRD and MUD transplants. Although most experience has been obtained using BM, emerging data suggest that a G-CSF mobilized PBSC graft can also safely be used for Haplo-post-HCT-CY. Haplo-post-HCT-CY also avoids the graft acquisition costs of DUCBT and MUDs and the cost of cell selection associated with T-depleted grafts. Although randomized comparisons will be forthcoming, Haplo-post-HCT-CY can already be considered a valid standard-of-care in patients who lack conventional donors thus extending the availability of allogeneic transplants to almost all patients. This donor source may also challenge the routine preference for a MUD in patients lacking an MRD.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 19 May 2014; doi:10.1038/bmt.2014.62.
    Bone Marrow Transplantation 05/2014; 49(8). DOI:10.1038/bmt.2014.62 · 3.47 Impact Factor
  • Blood 01/2014; 123(1):7-8. DOI:10.1182/blood-2013-11-537001 · 9.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose of review Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is an increasingly life threatening complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with the use of more complex transplant procedures. Recent findings Reduced intensity conditioning regimens in combination with in-vivo or ex-vivo T-cell depletion are particularly important risk factors. Prospective monitoring of EBV viremia by real-time quantitative polymerase-chain reaction (PCR) should be performed after high-risk allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, lack of standardization and concerns about sensitivity and low positive-predictive value challenge the interpretation of PCR monitoring. Preemptive treatment is feasible and can reduce EBV-related mortality but may lead to overtreatment in some patients. Readily available rituximab and methods of adoptive transfer of T-cells are valuable tools. Rituximab is probably the most attractive agent showing the most robust data in this setting. Rituximab seems to offer a good balance between efficacy and toxicity for the treatment of established EBV-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. But most often there is a need to combine with adoptive immunotherapy with T-cells to maintain long-term disease control, with either simple unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusion or more specific and complex adoptive EBV-specific cytotoxic T-cells. Summary EBV-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder can often be prevented or treated, especially in earlier stages. The specific role and timing of the different treatment strategies need to be defined.
    Current Opinion in Oncology 08/2014; 26(6). DOI:10.1097/CCO.0000000000000119 · 3.76 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 29, 2014