Delayed Presentation of a Giant Ascending Aortic Aneurysm following Aortic Valve Replacement

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bursa Yüksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Case Reports in Medicine 01/2009; 2009:740247. DOI: 10.1155/2009/740247
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Giant ascending aortic aneurysm formation following aortic valve replacement is rare. A 28-year-old man who underwent aortic valve replacement with a prosthetic valve for aortic regurgitation secondary to congenital bicuspid aortic valve about 10 years ago was diagnosed with a giant ascending aortic aneurysm about 16 cm in diameter in follow-up. The aneurysm was resected leaving the functional old mechanical prosthesis in place and implanted a 34-mm Hemashield woven graft, associated with the left and right coronary artery button implantation. Histological findings of the aortic aneurysm wall showed cystic medial necrosis. The postoperative course was uneventful and postoperative examination demonstrated good surgical results.

Download full-text


Available from: Senol Yavuz, Sep 28, 2015
22 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is the most common form of congenital heart disease, affecting 1-2% of the population. Only 20% of patients will maintain normal valve function throughout their life and more than 30% of patients will develop serious morbidity. It is a highly heritable condition, with transmission likely to be autosomal dominant. Patients with BAV have a 10-fold risk of aortic dissection when compared to the normal population. Management of BAV associated aortopathy represents a significant clinical challenge.
    Heart, Lung and Circulation 06/2008; 17(5):357-63. DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2008.01.007 · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present a case report and review of the literature on a giant ascending aortic aneurysm in a previously asymptomatic and healthy 40-year-old male patient who presented in extremis and had a successful emergency surgical repair. The need for early referral and surgery is stressed for better outcome. The review also discusses the natural history, presentation and treatment options and results of this uncommon entity justifying the need for an operation for survival. © 2006 Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand.
    Heart, Lung and Circulation 11/2007; 16(5):385-8. DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2006.09.009 · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with bicuspid aortic valve are at increased risk for aortic complications. A total of 115 consecutive patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease underwent surgery of the ascending aorta. We classified the cusp configuration by 3 types: fusion of left coronary and right coronary cusps (type A), fusion of right coronary and noncoronary cusps (type B), and fusion of left coronary and noncoronary cusps (type C). Histopathologic changes in the ascending aortic wall were graded (aortic wall score). We observed type A fusion in 85 patients (73.9%), type B fusion in 28 patients (24.3%), and type C fusion in 2 patients (1.8%). Patients with type A fusion were younger at operation than patients with type B fusion (51.3 +/- 15.5 years vs 58.7 +/- 7.6 years, respectively; P = .034). The mean ascending aorta diameter was 48.9 +/- 5.0 mm and 48.7 +/- 5.7 mm in type A and type B fusion groups, respectively (P = .34). The mean aortic root diameter was significantly larger in type A fusion (4.9 +/- 6.7 mm vs 32.7 +/- 2.8 mm; P < .0001). The aortic wall score was significantly higher in type A fusion than in type B fusion (P = .02). The prevalence of aortic wall histopathologic changes was significantly higher in type A fusion. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences between type A and type B fusion in terms of prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve stenosis, regurgitation, or mixed disease. In diseased bicuspid aortic valves, there was a statistically significant association between type A valve anatomy and a more severe degree of wall degeneration in the ascending aorta and dilatation of the aortic root at younger age compared with type B valve anatomy.
    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 10/2008; 136(4):937-42. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.11.072 · 4.17 Impact Factor
Show more