The population approach to falls injury prevention in older people: findings of a two community trial

Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Public Health (Impact Factor: 2.26). 02/2010; 10(1):79. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-79
Source: PubMed


There is a sound rationale for the population-based approach to falls injury prevention but there is currently insufficient evidence to advise governments and communities on how they can use population-based strategies to achieve desired reductions in the burden of falls-related injury. The aim of the study was to quantify the effectiveness of a streamlined (and thus potentially sustainable and cost-effective), population-based, multi-factorial falls injury prevention program for people over 60 years of age.
Population-based falls-prevention interventions were conducted at two geographically-defined and separate Australian sites: Wide Bay, Queensland, and Northern Rivers, NSW. Changes in the prevalence of key risk factors and changes in rates of injury outcomes within each community were compared before and after program implementation and changes in rates of injury outcomes in each community were also compared with the rates in their respective States.
The interventions in neither community substantially decreased the rate of falls-related injury among people aged 60 years or older, although there was some evidence of reductions in occurrence of multiple falls reported by women. In addition, there was some indication of improvements in fall-related risk factors, but the magnitudes were generally modest.
The evidence suggests that low intensity population-based falls prevention programs may not be as effective as those that are intensively implemented.

19 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Start of the above-titled section of the conference proceedings.
  • Value in Health 10/2009; 12(7). DOI:10.1016/S1098-3015(10)74779-3 · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite widespread application of the public health approach to injury prevention, there is an acknowledged limitation in the extent to which it facilitates translation of research evidence to injury prevention practice. In this paper we clarify the ecoepidemiological principles that underpin the public health approach to injury control in order to support explicit efforts to address the multilevel component causes and improve the evidence base on which effective program implementation depends. KEYPOINTS: If injury causation is understood in terms of the ecoepidemiological model rather than the proximal risk factor model, then quantification of the context in which the event occurs is evidently as important as quantification of the energy exchange event itself. The ecoepidemiological model of injury causation recognises barriers and facilitators to injury prevention as component causes of population burden of injury and thus delineates these factors as legitimate targets for intervention. Injury prevention programs that are designed to specifically address the factors causally related to the program's implementation, as well as the contextual factors that determine the characteristics of the energy exchange event, are more likely to be implemented and more likely to result in effective uptake of recommended energy exchange countermeasures. Interventions to reduce the burden of injury in the population should address the individual level factors that increase the risk of injury, but also the upstream factors that influence the extent to which there is widespread adoption by individuals of the recommended countermeasures.
    Injury 07/2010; 41 Suppl 1:S16-9. DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2010.05.001 · 2.14 Impact Factor
Show more