Article

Managing Genetic Variation to Conserve Genetic Diversity in Goats and Sheep

Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty 01/2010;
Source: DOAJ

ABSTRACT Domestic goat and sheep populations maintained for many generations with small numbers of male and female parents, or declining in total numbers, not only endure accumulated genetic drift but also a steady rise in inbreeding, which can be directly attributed to dispersive forces of evolutionary significance that influence gene frequency. Increasing effective population size shows theoretical promise in lessening the impact on erosion of biodiversity from genetic drift. For example, doubling the effective numbers of parents which increases effective population size reduces rate of inbreeding by nearly one-half in many of the scenarios in the present study. Similarly, equalizing the number of male and female parents can decrease the variance among progeny of each parent, which in turn increases effective population size. The recurring erosion of domestic goat and sheep diversity has contributed to decreased fecundity, reduced fitness and poor adaptability, all known to influence efficiency of production. The potential loss in performance of livestock and poultry following many generations of accumulated genetic drift, which often goes unnoticed, can be predicted for specific populations from precise estimates of their mean value, additive genetic variance and heritability along with their effective number of male and female parents. For example, when the effective population size decreases from 200 to 40, the potential reduction in mean performance for economically important traits of goat and sheep populations following 20 generations of accumulated genetic drift will nearly double. In contrast, increasing effective population size from 200 to 600 will have the potential reduction in mean performance. The accumulation of favourable mutations could imply an effective population size of 100 or more, which is equal to a rise in rate of inbreeding of 0.5% or less, may be acceptable in sustaining genetic response to artificial selection in commercial breeding populations. The application of quantitative genetic principles related to inbreeding and genetic drift make it possible to safeguard against erosion of genetic diversity in endangered breeds, populations and landraces while lessening the impact from potential loss in their performance. Conservation of domestic animal diversity can be achieved by managing the erosion of genetic variation based on breeding strategies which promote the mating of sires to all dams, in either ‘random bred’ or ‘balanced pedigreed’ breeding structure for populations of endangered domestic goats and sheep. Obviously, the in-situ and ex-situ conservation of live animals, along with cryogenic preservation of their gametes, stem cells, somatic cells, blood and gonads will be complementary to conservation breeding.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
498 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lactation records of the Skopelos dairy goat population were used to assess the importance of various environmental effects and to estimate genetic parameters for 90-day milk yield (9OMY) and total milk yield (TMY) on untransformed and on log scale. Average 9OMY, TMY and days of milking were 164.7, 239.2kg and 187 days, respectively. Herd, production year, lambing month, birth type, lactation number, the herd by year, year by month, year by lactation number interactions and days of milking were found statistically significant for TMY. Heritability estimates were 0.15 and 0.14 for 9OMY and TMY, respectively. Higher heritabilities of 0.24 and of 0.28 were estimated on the log scale for 90MY and TMY, respectively. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between 9OMY and total milk yield were found high, of 0.95 and 0.80, respectively.
    Small Ruminant Research 01/2000; 36(1):1-5. · 1.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper assesses biodiversity in the goat and investigates whether there is some peculiarity in this biodiversity as compared to other species. The paper depends mainly on published databases and reviews. In 1999, there were over 710 million goats in the world in a total of 570 breeds. Developing countries harbour 96% of the world goat population, but only 60% of the breeds. An index of the number of breeds per million of population was used to compare degree of biodiversity in different livestock species. This index for the goat was 0.8 as compared to 1.2 for sheep, 0.9 for cattle and 0.5 for buffalo. The highest proportion of breeds without reported population size is in the goat. Percentage of goat breeds not at risk was calculated as 41 as compared to 64 in buffalo, 36 for cattle, 39 for sheep, 21 for pig, 11 for ass, 25 for horse and 69 for camel and dromedary, while breed extinction percentage was 3, 0, 17, 12, 23, 6, 11 and 0, respectively. In terms of performance traits, Europe has the heaviest goat breeds with largest litter size and milk production, while Latin America and the Caribbean scored lowest in all these performance traits. Among-breed variability was lowest in Europe and highest in Africa. It is concluded that according to available information, biodiversity in the goat is within the range of that in other farm animal species. Many goat breeds are not characterized because most goats and breeds are in developing countries and/or under extensive production systems where characterization becomes more demanding.
    Small Ruminant Research - SMALL RUMINANT RES. 01/2005; 60(1):75-81.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: “The nations accepting this constitution being determined to promote the common welfare by furthering separate and collective action on their part for the purpose of raising levels of nutrition and standards of living of the people under their jurisdiction, securing improvements in the efficiency of the production of all food and agricultural products, bettering the conditions of rural populations, and thus contributing toward an expanding world economy, hereby establish the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.”
    International Organization 05/1947; 1(02):291 - 306. · 2.98 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
25 Downloads
Available from