Thoracic Aorta: Prospective Electrocardiographically Triggered CT Angiography with Dual-Source CT—Feasibility, Image Quality, and Dose Reduction 1

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Radiology (Impact Factor: 6.87). 02/2010; 255(1):207-17. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09090860
Source: PubMed


To prospectively investigate the feasibility, image quality, and radiation dose for prospective electrocardiographically (ECG) triggered sequential dual-source computed tomographic (CT) angiography of the thoracic aorta in comparison to retrospective ECG-gated helical dual-source CT angiography.
This study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtained. One hundred thirty-nine patients referred for ECG-assisted dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic aorta were prospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria were stable sinus rhythm and heart rate of 80 beats per minute or less. Tube voltage was adjusted to body mass index (< 25.0 kg/m(2), 100 kV, n = 58; > or = 25.0 kg/m(2), 120 kV, n = 81). In both cohorts, patients were randomly assigned to prospective or retrospective ECG-assisted data acquisition. In both groups, tube current (250 mAs per rotation) was centered at 70% of the R-R cycle. The presence of motion or stair-step artifacts of the thoracic aorta was independently assessed by two readers. Effective radiation dose was calculated from the dose-length product.
Subjective scoring of motion and stair-step artifacts was equivalent for both techniques. Scan length was not significantly different (23.8 cm +/- 2.4 [standard deviation] vs 23.7 cm +/- 2.5 for prospective and retrospective ECG-triggered CT angiography, respectively; P = .54). Scanning time was significantly longer for prospective ECG-triggered CT angiography (18.8 seconds +/- 3.4 vs 16.4 seconds +/- 3.3, P < .001). Mean estimated effective dose was significantly lower for prospective data acquisition (100 kV, 1.9 mSv +/- 0.5 vs 4.1 mSv +/- 0.7, P < .001; 120 kV, 5.3 mSv +/- 1.1 vs 9.5 mSv +/- 3.0, P < .001).
Prospective ECG-gated sequential dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic aorta is feasible, despite the slightly longer acquisition time. Thus, motion-free imaging of the thoracic aorta is possible at significantly lower radiation exposure than retrospective ECG-gated helical dual-source CT angiography in certain patients with a regular heart rate.

3 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: CT angiography (CTA) is a well established first line imaging modality used to assess diseases of the vasculature. In recent years new technologies, such as cardiac-gating, dual energy, high-pitch helical scanning, and iterative reconstruction have offered new and innovative means of imaging diseases of the thoracic aorta. In addition, recent research has further deepened our understanding of many of these well known diseases. A brief review of new CT technologies, our new knowledge of aortic diseases, and how to utilize modern CTA techniques to evaluate diseases of the aorta is presented herein.
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 10/2012; 5(5). DOI:10.1007/s12410-012-9156-2
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a prospective ECG-gated, low kilovoltage and low mAs protocol on image quality and radiation dose when acquiring CT angiography of the thoracic aorta (CTTA). Sixty patients with a body mass index (BMI) of less than 30 and a heart rate of less than 100 beats per minute (bpm) were included in the study. Thirty consecutive patients were examined with retrospective ECG-gating and standard parameters (group A) (120 kVp, 340 reference effective mAs).The next thirty (group B) were examined with prospective ECG-gating, 100 kVp and 170 mAs. Quantitative analysis included measurements of image resolution of the thoracic aorta at three levels, mean attenuation in the aorta and signal to noise ratio (SNR). Qualitative analysis assessed image artifact and graded image quality on five point scales. Effective radiation doses were estimated. The radiation dose of group A was 26.2 ± 6.0 mSv (mean ± standard deviation). For group B it was 2.9 ± 0.5 mSv (P < 0.001). Mean aortic attenuation was significantly higher in group B than group A (487 ± 100 Hu and 372 ± 74 Hu) (P < 0.01).SNR was significantly higher in group A (21.7 ± 5.7 compared to 14.5 ± 5.3) (P < 0.01). Image resolution was significantly higher in group B at all measured anatomical levels (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the final subjective scores between group A and group B (Mann-Whitney U = 438, P = 0.79). High quality low dose CTTA is clinically achievable, in patients with a BMI less than 30 and a heart rate less than 100 bpm, using a prospective ECG-gated, low kilovoltage, low mAs technique.
    The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 11/2010; 27(7):1025-34. DOI:10.1007/s10554-010-9742-9 · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: CT angiography is the imaging modality of choice for the pre- and postsurgical evaluation of patients with pathologies of the thoracic aorta. The purpose of this review is to familiarize the reader with the technical principle, recent technical developments and requirements for specific examination protocols and image interpretation, and to highlight common pathologies and findings.
    RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der R 12/2010; 183(4):334-46. DOI:10.1055/s-0029-1245905 · 1.40 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications