Article

Axial, area and anteroposterior diameter as estimates of Left atrial size using computed tomography of the chest: Comparison with 3-dimensional volume

Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 400, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography (Impact Factor: 4.51). 01/2010; 4(1):49-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.10.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Left atrial (LA) size has incremental value in risk stratification.
We aimed to assess feasibility and reproducibility of 2 quick measures of LA size by chest CT (axial LA area and LA anteroposterior [AP] diameter) by using contrast-enhanced and CT scans.
We measured LA size in 100 contrast-enhanced 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) scans (randomly selected from the ROMICAT collective) by (1) axial LA area at the level of the left ventricular outflow tract and the mitral valve leaflets, (2) AP diameter in 3-chamber view, and (3) 3-dimensional (3D) LA volume by Simpson's methods. We assessed interobserver and intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for axial LA area and AP diameter as well as their correlation to 3D LA volume. For axial area, feasibility and reproducibility were also determined in 100 non-contrast MDCT scans, randomly selected from the Framingham Heart Offspring collective.
In contrast-enhanced CT, both LA axial area and AP diameter had excellent reproducibility (interobserver: axial area: ICC, 0.96, mean relative difference, 2.4% +/- 7.4%; AP diameter: ICC, 0.91, 3.6% +/- 7.2%; intraobserver: axial area: ICC, 0.99, 0.4% +/- 5.2%; AP diameter: ICC, 0.94, 1.7% +/- 5.5%). Correlations with 3D volume were better for axial area (r=0.88) than for AP diameter (r=0.67). In non-contrast images, axial area could be assessed with excellent reproducibility (interobserver: ICC, 0.96, 0.5% +/- 8.3%; intraobserver: ICC, 0.99, 0.01% +/- 4.4%).
Both AP diameter and axial LA area permit quick and reproducible estimates of LA volume in contrast-enhanced and non-contrast electrocardiographic-gated chest CT. However, LA area should be used preferably over AP diameter because of its better agreement to 3D LA volume.

Full-text

Available from: Christopher J O'Donnell, Jun 09, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
155 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Left main coronary artery (LMCA) damage is a rare but catastrophic complication of cardiac ablation procedures.
    Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.08.006 · 4.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is increased in subjects with atrial fibrillation (AF). Likewise, EAT is associated with left atrial (LA) size, as itself is a strong predictor of AF. We aimed to determine the association of EAT and LA size as computed tomography (CT)-derived measures with prevalent and incident AF and investigated whether both measures independently predict AF. Participants from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study without known cardiovascular disease were included. At baseline, EAT, defined as fat volume inside the pericardial sac, and LA size, defined as an axial area at the level of the mitral valve, were quantified from non-contrast enhanced cardiac CT. AF was determined from electrocardiogram at baseline and also at 5-year follow-up examination. Overall, 3467 participants (age: 58.9 ± 7.6 years, 47% male) were included. Ninety-six subjects had AF (46 prevalent and 50 incident). A 1-standard deviation (SD) change of EAT was associated with nearly two-fold increased prevalence of AF in univariate analysis, which persisted after adjustment for AF risk factors [odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval, 95% CI): 1.38 (1.11-1.72), P = 0.003]. Ancillary adjusting for LA reduced the effect [1.26 (0.996-1.60), P = 0.054]. For incident AF, no relevant effect was observed for EAT when adjusting for risk factors [1.19 (0.88-1.61), P = 0.26]. In contrast, a 1-SD chance of LA was strongly associated with AF independently of EAT and risk factors [2.70 (2.22-2.20), P < 0.0001]. LA but not EAT as non-contrast CT-derived measures improved the prediction of AF over risk factors (receiver operating characteristics: 0.810-0.845, P = 0.025). LA size from non-contrast CT is strongly associated with prevalent and incident AF and ultimately diminishes the link of EAT with AF.
    02/2014; 15(8). DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeu006
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Echocardiography based data suggests that left atrial (LA) size is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Once non-contrast cardiac CT is performed for prevention purposes, information on the LA is readily available. We aimed to determine whether LA area from non-contrast cardiac CT is associated with incident major cardiovascular (CV) events, independent of CV risk factors and coronary artery calcium (CAC), based on a general population cohort. Subjects aged 45-75years without prevalent CV disease from the population-based Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study were enrolled between 2000 and 2003. LA area at the level of the mitral valve was quantified from non-contrast cardiac CT. Major CV events (coronary event, stroke, CV death) were assessed during follow-up. The association of LA with events was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Overall, 3958 subjects (59.2±7.7years, 53% female) were included. Mean LA area was 17.64±4.22cm(2) (range: 7.16-44.13cm(2)). During 8.0±1.5years of follow-up, 221 major CV events occurred. In univariate analysis, increase of LA size by 1 standard deviation was associated with nearly 50% excess events (HR (95%CI): 1.48 (1.32-1.65)), which remained significant after adjustment for CV risk factors (HR (95%CI): 1.25 (1.09-1.43)) and when additionally adjusting for CAC (HR (95%CI): 1.22 (1.07-1.40)). Associations for LA size were similar for each endpoint and again independent of risk factors and CAC (coronary event: HR (95%CI): 1.21 (1.01-1.45); stroke: 1.31 (1.05-1.63); CV death: 1.33 (1.03-1.71)). LA size is associated with incident major CV events independent of risk factors and CAC-score. Once cardiac CT imaging is performed, assessment of LA size may complement information of this imaging modality.
    International journal of cardiology 04/2014; 240(1). DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.068 · 6.18 Impact Factor