Patient Navigation: Development of a Protocol for Describing What Navigator's Do

Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St. T3W, Boston, MA 02118-2526, USA.
Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 2.78). 04/2010; 45(2):514-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01079.x
Source: PubMed


To develop a structured protocol for observing patient navigators at work, describing and characterizing specific activities related to their goals.
Fourteen extended observations of navigators at three programs within a national trial of patient navigation.
Preliminary observations were guided by a conceptual model derived from the literature and expert consensus, then coded to develop and refine observation categories. These findings were then used to develop the protocol.
Observation fieldnotes were coded, using both a priori codes and new codes based on emergent themes. Using these codes, the team refined the model and constructed an observation tool that enables consistent categorization of the observed range of navigator actions.
Navigator actions across a wide variety of settings can be categorized in a matrix with two dimensions. One dimension categorizes the individuals and organizational entities with whom the navigator interacts; the other characterizes the types of tasks carried out by the navigators in support of their patients.
Use of this protocol will enable researchers to systematically characterize and compare navigator activities within and across programs.

Download full-text


Available from: Jack A Clark,
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using random assignment, this study examined whether a program of enhanced medical care and employment supports can improve the health status, employment, and disability outcomes of working adults with potentially disabling conditions. Using federal data from the Social Security Administration and participant survey data, we analyzed the impact of program interventions on employment, earnings, and disability. We compared unadjusted mean outcomes between treatment and control groups one year after enrollment. We also used multivariate analyses to estimate regression-adjusted impacts on the likelihood of applying for disability benefits, employment, and earnings after controlling for baseline participant characteristics. We found that the pooled treatment group across all four states was less likely to have a federal disability application one year after enrollment (3.9 percent versus 5.3 percent) and a higher level of income ($15,972 versus $14,536) relative to the control group. Both effects were statistically significant at the 5 percent level. We also found that the treatment group had a higher share of participants employed (94.4 percent versus 87.1 percent), but this difference was not statistically significant. An early intervention program of medical care and employment supports that is focused on working adults with potentially disabling conditions was shown to improve the health status of participants and reduce the likelihood of applying for federal disability. These findings suggest that disability can be prevented or delayed with a well-designed program that includes both health and employment supports for individuals.
    138st APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition 2010; 11/2010
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As health care delivery becomes increasingly focused on patient-centered models, interventions such as patient navigation that have the potential to improve care coordination garner interest from health care managers and clinicians. The ability to understand how and to what extent patient navigation is successful in addressing coordination issues, however, is hampered by multiple definitions, vague boundaries, and different contextual implementations of patient navigation. Using a systematic review strategy and classification method, we review both the conceptual and empirical literature regarding navigation in multiple clinical contexts. We then describe and conceptualize variation in how patient navigation has been defined, implemented, and theorized to affect outcomes. This review suggests that patient navigation varies along multiple dimensions and that the variation is related to differing resources, constraints, and goals. We propose a conceptual model to frame further research and suggest that research in this area must carefully account for this variation in order to accurately assess the benefits of patient navigation and provide actionable knowledge for managers.
    Advances in Health Care Management 01/2011; 11:149-83. DOI:10.1108/S1474-8231(2011)0000011010
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient navigation requires that patient load be equitably distributed. We examined whether navigators could predict the relative amount of time needed by different patients for navigation. Analysis of 139 breast and colorectal cancer patients randomized to the navigation arm of a trial evaluating the effectiveness of navigation. Navigators completed a one-item scale estimating how much navigation time patients were likely to require. Participants were mostly females (89.2%) with breast cancer (83.4%); barriers to cancer care were insurance difficulties (26.6%), social support (18.0%), and transportation (14.4%). Navigator baseline estimates of navigation intensity predicted total navigation time, independent of patient characteristics. The total number of barriers, rather than any specific type of barrier, predicted increased navigator time, with a 16% increase for each barrier. Navigators' estimate of intensity independently predicts navigation time for cancer patients. Findings have implications for assigning navigator case loads.
    Journal of Cancer Education 05/2011; 26(4):761-6. DOI:10.1007/s13187-011-0234-y · 1.23 Impact Factor
Show more