Article

Interactive Voice Response Technology Can Deliver Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Primary Care

The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 04/2010; 25(4):340-4. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1233-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Alcohol screening and brief intervention (BI) is an effective primary care preventive service, but implementation rates are low. Automating BI using interactive voice response (IVR) may be an efficient way to expand patient access to needed information and advice.
To develop IVR-based BI and pilot test it for feasibility and acceptability.
Single-group pre-post feasibility study.
Primary care patients presenting for an office visit.
IVR-BI structured to correspond to the provider BI method recommended by NIAAA: (1) Ask about use; (2) Assess problems; (3) Advise and Assist for change, and (4) Follow up for continued support. Advice was tailored to patient readiness and preferences.
Utilization rate, call duration, and patients' subjective reports of usefulness, comfort and honesty with the IVR-BI. Pre-post evaluation of motivation to change and change in alcohol consumption as measured by Timeline Follow Back.
Call duration ranged from 3-7 minutes. Subjective reactions were generally positive or neutral. About 40% of subjects indicated IVR-BI had motivated them to change. About half of the patients had discussed drinking with their provider at the visit. These tended to be heavier drinkers with greater concerns about drinking. Patients who reported a provider-delivered BI and called the IVR-BI endorsed greater comfort and honesty with the IVR-BI. On average, a 25% reduction in alcohol use was reported two weeks after the clinic visit.
Using IVR technology to deliver BI in a primary care setting is feasible and data suggest potential for efficacy in a larger trial.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Charles D Maclean, Jul 04, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
118 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alcohol is the world's third leading cause of ill-health and premature death. Alcohol has been found to be the most harmful drug, when considering harm to the individual and to others. With a prespecified search strategy we looked for relevant articles concerning screening, brief interventions and referral to treatment of patients with hazardous or harmful alcohol use, with a special focus on the primary healthcare implementation of these effective interventions. The evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of brief interventions in primary care continues to grow and is confirmed by many recent studies, even in specific populations. The implementation of those effective interventions continues to be difficult, but successful experiences have been reported. The use of brief interventions in other healthcare settings and to address problems other than risky drinking is promising, but the evidence is far from conclusive. Some specific age groups (elderly, women and youth below 16) may deserve specifically tailored interventions. Alcohol is a major public health problem and brief interventions are one of the cost-effective measures that can be taken at a community level. Nevertheless, implementation of those measures is difficult. Further research is needed to identify the best implementation strategies.
    Current opinion in psychiatry 03/2011; 24(3):203-7. DOI:10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283459256 · 3.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The delivery of brief interventions (BIs) in health care settings to reduce problematic alcohol consumption is a key preventive strategy for public health. However, evidence of effectiveness beyond primary care is inconsistent. Patient populations and intervention components are heterogeneous. Also, evidence for successful implementation strategies is limited. In this article, recent literature is reviewed covering BI effectiveness for patient populations and subgroups, and design and implementation of BIs. Support is evident for short-term effectiveness in hospital settings, but long-term effects may be confounded by changes in control groups. Limited evidence suggests effectiveness with young patients not admitted as a consequence of alcohol, dependent patients, and binge drinkers. Influential BI components include high-quality change plans and provider characteristics. Health professionals endorse BI and feel confident in delivering it, but training and support initiatives continue to show no significant effects on uptake, prompting calls for systematic approaches to implementing BI in health care.
    Current Psychiatry Reports 07/2011; 13(5):422-9. DOI:10.1007/s11920-011-0219-x · 3.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic pain is a medical condition that severely decreases the quality of life for those who struggle to cope with it. Interactive voice response (IVR) technology has the ability to track symptoms and disease progression, to investigate the relationships between symptom patterns and clinical outcomes, to assess the efficacy of ongoing treatments, and to directly serve as an adjunct to therapeutic treatment for chronic pain. While many approaches exist toward the management of chronic pain, all have their pitfalls and none work universally. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one approach that has been shown to be fairly effective, and therapeutic interactive voice response technology provides a convenient and easy-to-use means of extending the therapeutic gains of CBT long after patients have discontinued clinical visitations. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of IVR technology, provides evidence for the efficacy of the method in monitoring and managing chronic pain, and addresses potential future directions that the technology may take as a therapeutic intervention in its own right.
    03/2012; 2(1):93-101. DOI:10.1007/s13142-012-0115-x