Article

LA HIPERQUERATOSIS CITOLOGICA COMO PARAMETRO INDIRECTO DE LA INFECCIÓN POR EL VIRUS DEL PAPILOMA HUMANO.

Electronic Journal of Biomedicine 01/2009;
Source: DOAJ

ABSTRACT Introducción. La hiperqueratosis es una lesión epitelial que histológicamente se caracteriza, por presentar un aumento del grosor de la capa epitelial superficial cornificada, con ausencia de núcleos. Entre las causas que favorecen la aparición de hiperqueratosis, se puede resaltar la reacción del epitelio a los estímulos locales, mecánicos, químicos o infecciosos, siendo más relevante en estos casos el virus del papiloma humano. Objetivo: Conocer la relación que existe entre la presencia de hiperqueratosis en los estudios citológicos de cribado y la posible relación con la infección del virus del Papiloma Humano. Material y métodos: Se han estudiado un total de 2372 extendidos citológicos realizados durante un año en el Servicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología del Hospital Clínico de Salamanca. La edad de las pacientes estaba comprendida entre los 16 y 65 años. La toma citológica realizada mediante la técnica de triple toma se depositaba en medio líquido. Se descartaron las citologías que presentaban alteraciones citológicas, y se valoraron 1125 estudios citológicos considerados como negativos. De estos, 316 presentaron hiperqueratosis. A las pacientes que presentaban hiperqueratosis se les realizó estudio colposcópico y determinación de VPH por PCR. Resultados: En el 27% de las hiperqueratosis, la PCR de VPH fue negativa, el resto, positiva. Se ha podido determinar un VPP del 72% y un VPN del 39%. La sensibilidad fue del 46% y la Especificidad del 81%.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
212 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was undertaken to evaluate knowledge of cervical dysplasia and human papillomavirus (HPV) among women seen in a colposcopy clinic. Demographics, knowledge, and psychological distress were assessed in structured interviews with 175 women before, during, and after colposcopy. Respondents had low knowledge scores before and after colposcopy; however, their overall knowledge improved slightly (P = 0.013) following the exam. When responses were examined by question, respondents demonstrated a significant increase of correct answers to only one question: Does dysplasia, or precancerous cells on the cervix, always go away without treatment? Pre-exam knowledge was positively associated with educational level and was lower among Hispanics and patients recruited at the clinic. Post-exam knowledge was positively associated with pre-exam knowledge and educational level. Routine clinical education during colposcopy can improve patients' understanding of cervical cancer; however, the low level of knowledge that persisted after colposcopy is a cause for concern.
    Gynecologic Oncology 01/2006; 99(3 Suppl 1):S236-44. · 3.93 Impact Factor
  • Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association (1975) 06/1990; 86(5):275-8.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than cytology alone for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), studies comparing conventional and liquid-based cytology have had conflicting results. In the first phase of a two-phase multicenter randomized controlled trial, women aged 35-60 years in the conventional arm (n = 16,658) were screened using conventional cytology, and women in the experimental arm (n = 16,706) had liquid-based cytology and were tested for high-risk HPV types using the Hybrid Capture 2 assay. Women in the conventional arm were referred to colposcopy with atypical cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or higher and those in the experimental arm were referred with ASCUS or higher cytology or with a positive (> or = 1 pg/mL) HPV test. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) were calculated. The screening methods and referral criterion applied in the experimental arm had higher sensitivity than that in the conventional arm (relative sensitivity = 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03 to 2.09) but a lower PPV (relative PPV = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.66). With HPV testing alone at > or = 1 pg/mL and at > or = 2 pg/mL, the gain in sensitivity compared with the conventional arm remained similar (relative sensitivity = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.00 to 2.04 and relative sensitivity = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.98 to 2.01, respectively) but PPV progressively improved (relative PPV = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.98 and relative PPV = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.45 and 1.27, respectively). Referral based on liquid-based cytology alone did not increase sensitivity compared with conventional cytology (relative sensitivity = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.72 to 1.55) but reduced PPV (relative PPV = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.82). HPV testing alone was more sensitive than conventional cytology among women 35-60 years old. Adding liquid-based cytology improved sensitivity only marginally but increased false-positives. HPV testing using Hybrid Capture 2 with a 2 pg/mL cutoff may be more appropriate than a 1 pg/mL cutoff for primary cervical cancer screening.
    CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment 06/2006; 98(11):765-74. · 14.07 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
1 Download
Available from