Article

Obesity paradox and cardiorespiratory fitness in 12,417 male veterans aged 40 to 70 years.

Department of Human Performance and Sport Sciences, Winston-Salem State University, 601 S Martin Luther King Jr Dr, Anderson C 24-E, Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USA.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Impact Factor: 5.79). 02/2010; 85(2):115-21. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0562
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the influence of cardiorespiratory fitness (fitness) on the obesity paradox in middle-aged men with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
This study consists of 12,417 men aged 40 to 70 years (44% African American) who were referred for exercise testing at the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in Washington, DC, or Palo Alto, CA (between January 1, 1983, and June 30, 2007). Fitness was quantified as metabolic equivalents achieved during a maximal exercise test and was categorized for analysis as low, moderate, and high (defined as <5, 5-10, and >10 metabolic equivalents, respectively). Adiposity was defined by body mass index (BMI) according to standard clinical guidelines. Separate and combined associations of fitness and adiposity with all-cause mortality were assessed by Cox proportional hazards analyses.
We recorded 2801 deaths during a mean+/-SD follow-up of 7.7+/-5.3 years. Multivariate hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for all-cause mortality, with normal weight (BMI, 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) used as the reference group, were 1.9 (1.5-2.3), 0.7 (0.7-0.8), 0.7 (0.6-0.7), and 1.0 (0.8-1.1) for BMIs of less than 18.5, 25.0 to 29.9, 30.0 to 34.9, and 35.0 or more kg/m2, respectively. Compared with highly fit normal-weight men, underweight men with low fitness had the highest (4.5 [3.1-6.6]) and highly fit overweight men the lowest (0.4 [0.3-0.6]) mortality risk of any subgroup. Overweight and obese men with moderate fitness had mortality rates similar to those of the highly fit normal-weight reference group.
Fitness altered the obesity paradox. Overweight and obese men had increased longevity only if they registered high fitness.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
114 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lower habitual physical activity and poor cardiorespiratory fitness are common features of the metabolically abnormal obese (MAO) phenotype that contribute to increased cardiovascular disease risk. The aims of the present study were to determine 1) whether community-based exercise training transitions MAO adults to metabolically healthy, and 2) whether the odds of transition to metabolically healthy were larger for obese individuals who performed higher volumes of exercise and/or experienced greater increases in fitness.
    Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy 01/2014; 7:369-80.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The impact of body mass index on acute ischemic stroke outcomes is unclear.Aims and/or hypothesisWe sought to determine the effect of body mass index on short-term (90 days) acute ischemic stroke outcomes.Methods Data were extracted for patients with acute ischemic stroke and records of body mass index at baseline from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive database. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to analyze effect of body mass index on poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale >2) and mortality, respectively, within 90 days of stroke's onset.ResultsOf the 4811 patients (mean age 68·8 ± 12·2 years) included in the study, 2002 (41·6%) were overweight, and 1095 (22·8%) were obese. Overweight (body mass index 25–29·9 kg/m2) was associated with decreased mortality (hazard ratios 0·59; 95% confidence interval 0·51–0·68; P < 0·01) and decrease in poor functional outcome (odds ratio 0·74; 95% confidence interval 0·64–0·85; P < 0·01) following acute ischemic stroke. The association of body mass index with stroke outcomes was dependent on age, gender, and use of thrombolytic therapy.Conclusions Being overweight or obese is associated with a better functional outcome and reduced mortality in patients of acute ischemic stroke. However, the definition of an ‘optimal’ body mass index, in relation to stroke outcomes, may be affected by age, gender, and use of thrombolytic therapy.
    International Journal of Stroke 07/2014; 9(5). · 4.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To evaluate the effects of body composition as a function of lean mass index (LMI) and body fat (BF) on the correlation between increasing body mass index (BMI; calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared) and decreasing mortality, which is known as the obesity paradox. Patients and Methods We retrospectively assessed 47,866 patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%). We calculated BF by using the Jackson-Pollock equation and LMI using (1 − BF) × BMI. The population was divided according to the sex-adjusted BMI classification, sex-adjusted LMI classification, and sex-adjusted BF tertiles. The population was analyzed by using multivariate analysis for total mortality over a mean follow-up duration of 3.1 years by using the National Death Index, adjusting for left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index, age, sex, and relative wall thickness. Results In the entire population, higher BMI was narrowly associated (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; P<.001) with lower mortality. The higher LMI group was clearly protective (HR, 0.71; P<.001), whereas BF tertile was associated with lower mortality only if no adjustment was made for LMI (HR, 0.87; P<.001 without LMI; HR, 0.97; P=.23 with LMI). In the lean patients, low BMI was clearly associated with higher mortality (HR, 0.92; P<.001) and lower BF tertile was associated with lower mortality only if no adjustment was made for LMI (HR, 0.80; P<.001 without LMI; HR, 1.01; P=.83 with LMI). The underweight patients stratified by BF seemed to have an increased mortality (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.56-2.34) that was independent of LMI. However, in obese patients, both BMI (HR, 1.03; P<.001) and BF (HR, 1.18; P=.003) were associated with higher mortality, even after adjusting for LMI, which remained protective (HR, 0.57; P<.001) independently of BF. Conclusion Body composition could explain the inverse J shape of the mortality curve noted with increasing BMI. Body fat seems to be protective in this cohort only if no adjustment was made for LMI, although being underweight stratified by BF seems to be an independent risk factor. Lean mass index seems to remain protective in obese patients even when BMI is not.
    Mayo Clinic Proceedings 08/2014; · 5.81 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
55 Downloads
Available from
Jun 2, 2014