Article

Obesity Paradox and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in 12,417 Male Veterans Aged 40 to 70 Years

Department of Human Performance and Sport Sciences, Winston-Salem State University, 601 S Martin Luther King Jr Dr, Anderson C 24-E, Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USA.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Impact Factor: 5.81). 02/2010; 85(2):115-21. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0562
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the influence of cardiorespiratory fitness (fitness) on the obesity paradox in middle-aged men with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
This study consists of 12,417 men aged 40 to 70 years (44% African American) who were referred for exercise testing at the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in Washington, DC, or Palo Alto, CA (between January 1, 1983, and June 30, 2007). Fitness was quantified as metabolic equivalents achieved during a maximal exercise test and was categorized for analysis as low, moderate, and high (defined as <5, 5-10, and >10 metabolic equivalents, respectively). Adiposity was defined by body mass index (BMI) according to standard clinical guidelines. Separate and combined associations of fitness and adiposity with all-cause mortality were assessed by Cox proportional hazards analyses.
We recorded 2801 deaths during a mean+/-SD follow-up of 7.7+/-5.3 years. Multivariate hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for all-cause mortality, with normal weight (BMI, 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) used as the reference group, were 1.9 (1.5-2.3), 0.7 (0.7-0.8), 0.7 (0.6-0.7), and 1.0 (0.8-1.1) for BMIs of less than 18.5, 25.0 to 29.9, 30.0 to 34.9, and 35.0 or more kg/m2, respectively. Compared with highly fit normal-weight men, underweight men with low fitness had the highest (4.5 [3.1-6.6]) and highly fit overweight men the lowest (0.4 [0.3-0.6]) mortality risk of any subgroup. Overweight and obese men with moderate fitness had mortality rates similar to those of the highly fit normal-weight reference group.
Fitness altered the obesity paradox. Overweight and obese men had increased longevity only if they registered high fitness.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Ricardo Oliveira, Jul 05, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
131 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: To change implicit and explicit bias so that active obese people are regarded as more fit and normal weight sedentary people as less fit. Design: Study one created a questionnaire that measured perceptions of active obese persons and sedentary normal weight persons on fitness-related items. Study two used a modified visual probe task to retrain perceptions regarding active obese persons and sedentary normal weight persons. Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported explicit bias was measured with a questionnaire and implicit bias was measured with response times collected during a visual probe task. Results: The questionnaire reliably measured 'fitness and fatness' perceptions. In study two, pairing images of active obese persons with positive activity-related words resulted in active obese persons being explicitly rated more fit; pairing images of normal weight sedentary persons with negative words associated with sedentary lifestyles increased endorsement of normal weight people as unfit. There were no changes in implicit bias. Conclusions: Bias regarding how body weight is thought of relative to fitness can be altered by pairing images of obese persons being active with words such as "health" and "fit". This is evidence that representations of persons of all body weight should be used when promoting physical activity.
    Psychology & Health 01/2014; DOI:10.1080/08870446.2014.885024 · 1.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The obesity paradox in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains unexplained. We examined the role of self-rated health, behavioral and objectively assessed risk factors, in order to further explore mechanisms that might influence the association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality in CVD patients. METHODS: Participants were 4417 community dwelling adults from the Health Survey for England and Scottish Health Survey from 1994-2004 (aged 65.9±[SD 10.6yrs], 56.2% men) with clinically diagnosed CVD at baseline. RESULTS: There were 570 CVD and 1441 and all-cause deaths, over an average of 7.3yrs of follow-up. Overweight and obese patients reported worse self-rated health, more co-morbidities and biological risk factors. However, compared with non-obese participants (BMI<25kg/m2), a lower risk of all-cause mortality was observed in overweight (BMI 25<30kg/m2) (Hazard ratio [HR]=0.73, 95% CI, 0.64-0.82), and obese (BMI≥30kg/m2) participants (HR=0.84, 95% CI, 0.73-0.97) after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, physical activity, and various co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight and obese CVD patients have better prognosis despite reporting worse health, more co-morbidities and risk factors, and poorer adherence to lifestyle advice.
    Preventive Medicine 02/2013; 57(1). DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.012 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between body mass index (BMI) and cause-specific mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Prospective follow-up of a nationally representative cohort of 89,056 Taiwanese patients with T2DM recruited since 1995. Vital status was matched with the National Death Certificate Database until the end of 2006. Self-reported body weight and height were used to calculate BMI, which was treated either as a continuous or categorical variable (underweight, <18.5; normal, 18.5-22.9; overweight, 23.0-24.9; obesity I, 25.0-29.9; and obesity II, ≥30.0 kg/m(2)). Causes of death were classified as all-cause, cancer, diabetes complications (macrovascular and microvascular), and other. Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratios. RESULTS: A total of 26,951 patients (30.3% of the cohort) died during follow-up (cancer 5.4%, diabetes complications 17.4%, and other causes 7.5%). As a continuous variable, BMI was inversely associated with mortality from all-cause, cancer, diabetes complications, and other causes, with respective adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 0.942 (0.939-0.946), 0.966 (0.958-0.975), 0.935 (0.930-0.939), and 0.942 (0.935-0.949). Compared to normal weight, underweight was significantly predictive for any of causes of death, while overweight, obesity I, and obesity II were all significantly associated with mortality in an inverse pattern. After excluding patients with a follow-up duration <2 years, most BMI categories were not significantly predictive of mortality from cancer, suggesting a potential bias of cancer-induced weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: The obesity paradox, mainly observed in noncancer mortality, exists in patients with T2DM, suggesting a survival advantage in obese diabetic patients.
    Atherosclerosis 09/2012; 226(1). DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.09.004 · 3.97 Impact Factor