Article

Methotrexate Polyglutamate Concentrations Are Not Associated With Disease Control in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Long-Term Methotrexate Therapy

University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Arthritis & Rheumatology (Impact Factor: 7.87). 02/2010; 62(2):359-68. DOI: 10.1002/art.27201
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There are limited data suggesting that methotrexate polyglutamate (MTXGlu) concentrations can guide MTX dosing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to define a therapeutic range of red blood cell (RBC) MTXGlu(n) concentrations (where n refers to the number of glutamate groups), including threshold values for efficacy and adverse effects in patients receiving long-term oral MTX treatment.
A cross-sectional study of 192 patients receiving oral MTX was undertaken. Disease activity was assessed by the swollen and tender joint counts, the C-reactive protein level, and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28). High disease activity was defined as a DAS28 of >3.2. A standardized questionnaire regarding common MTX adverse effects was completed.
The MTX dosage was significantly higher in patients in whom the swollen joint count and DAS28 were higher. The MTXGlu(4), MTXGlu(5), MTXGlu(3-5), and MTXGlu(1-5) concentrations were significantly higher in patients with high disease activity. After correction for age, the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and the MTX dosage, the association remained significant for MTXGlu(5). RBC folate concentrations were significantly higher in the group with high disease activity. There was no association between any MTXGlu(n) concentration and adverse effects.
In contrast to other studies, the results of the present study did not show a relationship between the MTXGlu(n) concentration and reduced disease activity in patients with RA who were receiving long-term MTX therapy. However, disease activity was influenced by the RBC folate level, which may be a more important factor than MTXGlu(n) concentrations for disease control. In accordance with the findings of previous studies, we were unable to show a relationship between MTXGlu(n) concentrations and adverse effects. Prospective studies will be important to determine whether there is a role for measuring MTXGlu(n) concentrations in patients receiving long-term treatment with MTX.

Full-text

Available from: Murray L Barclay, Sep 25, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
130 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Folates exist as a fluctuating pool of polyglutamated metabolites that may serve as a clinical marker of MTX activity. This study evaluates circulating folate content and folate polyglutamate distribution in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) patients and in a cell culture model based on MTX exposure and folate supply.Methods: Blood, plasma and red blood cell (RBC) measurements of MTX and folates were obtained from previously published data sets and additional sample analysis for JIA patients receiving (n=98) and not receiving (n=78) MTX therapy. Erythroblastoid cells maintained in culture were exposed to MTX and grown under varying levels of folic acid supplementation. Samples were analyzed for cellular folate and MTX content.Results: Circulating folate levels were lower in JIA patients receiving MTX, with reduced levels of blood, plasma and RBC 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate (5mTHF) (p<0.0001). Average polyglutamate chain-length (Gluavg) of RBC 5mTHF was elevated in JIA patients receiving MTX (5.63±0.15 vs. 5.54±0.11, p<0.0001) and correlated with both RBC MTX accumulation (p=0.02) and reduced plasma 5mTHF levels (p=0.008). MTX exposure and folate deprivation in erythroblastoid cells resulted in a depletion of bioactive folate species that was associated with a shift to higher Gluavg values for several species, most notably tetrahydrofolate (THF) and 5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate (CH2-THF). Increased Gluavg resulted from the depletion of short-chain and the accumulation of long-chain glutamate species.Conclusion: Folate content and polyglutamate distribution are responsive markers of MTX activity and folate supply in vivo and in vitro, and may provide novel clinical markers of pharmacologic activity of MTX. © 2014 American College of Rheumatology.
    08/2014; DOI:10.1002/art.38865
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence regarding the relationship between red blood cell methotrexate polyglutamate concentration and response to treatment and adverse drug reactions in patients using methotrexate for inflammatory arthropathies is complex and in some respects appears conflicting. Accordingly, we undertook a systematic analysis of available evidence to determine the clinical utility of dosing methotrexate to a target red blood cell methotrexate polyglutamate concentration. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify all studies that had reported an association between red blood cell methotrexate polyglutamate concentration and disease activity or adverse drug reactions in users of methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis or psoriatic arthritis. No randomised controlled trials were identified. Thirteen studies (ten in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and three in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis) were identified. All studies evaluated an association between red blood cell methotrexate polyglutamate concentration and response to treatment, and eight evaluated an association with toxicity. Eight studies identified lower disease activity with at least one higher red blood cell methotrexate polyglutamate concentration, although there was at least moderate potential for bias in all of these studies. Relatively large increases in concentration appeared to be required to produce a meaningful reduction in disease activity. Only one study identified an association between red blood cell methotrexate polyglutamate concentration and methotrexate-induced side effects, although studies were likely underpowered to detect this type of association. The manner in which data were presented in the included studies had many limitations that hampered its conclusive assessment, but red blood cell methotrexate polyglutamate concentrations appear to be a potentially useful guide to treatment in patients with inflammatory arthropathies, but the specific polyglutamate that should be monitored and how monitoring could be integrated into treat-to-target approaches should be clarified before it can be routinely implemented.
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 02/2015; 71(4). DOI:10.1007/s00228-015-1819-x · 2.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Methotrexate (MTX) is considered the 'anchor drug' in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), yet many physicians do not optimise MTX regimens in spite of high RA disease activity. The recent development of an auto-injector for the subcutaneous (subQ) administration of MTX has prompted re-evaluation of MTX utilisation. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to determine the optimal dose, drug level, and route of administration for MTX in the context of relevant pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics. A systematic literature review was performed in Medline searching specifically for randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, case control and cohort studies evaluating outcomes related to MTX dose and route of administration. Articles fulfilling these inclusion criteria were reviewed. Data on MTX dose, route of administration, clinical response, drug levels and adverse events were evaluated. Our search identified 420 articles of which 6 were eligible for inclusion using the above criteria. These included 2 systematic reviews, 2 randomised open label trials, one longitudinal study and one retrospective cohort study. Efficacy and toxicity for MTX appear related to absorbed dose of MTX, not to route of administration. While bioavailability is greater for parenteral MTX, there is no evidence yet that splitting the oral dose of MTX is less advantageous, less safe or less tolerable than administering parenteral MTX. However, there appear to be modest benefits in beginning with higher doses of MTX, and switching to parenteral MTX when the clinical response to an oral dose is inadequate.
    Clinical and experimental rheumatology 12/2014; · 2.97 Impact Factor