Anal stenosis occurs most commonly following a surgical procedure, such as hemorrhoidectomy, excision and fulguration of anorectal warts, endorectal flaps, or following proctectomy, particularly in the setting of mucosectomy. Patients who experience anal stenosis describe constipation, bleeding, pain, and incomplete evacuation. Although often described as a debilitating and difficult problem, several good treatment options are available. In addition to simple dietary and medication changes, surgical procedures, such as lateral internal sphincterotomy or transfers of healthy tissue are other potentially good options. Flap procedures are excellent choices, depending on the location of the stenosis and the amount of viable tissue needed. This article presents the definition, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of anal stenosis, and methods to prevent it.
"Preventing any damage to the sphincter is important when performing a hemorrhoidectomy. Also, it requires agility to minimize scarring by preserving the anodermal skin island that acts as viable tissue bridge so that the surgical injuries can be naturally healed . "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Inappropriate therapies for hemorrhoids can lead to various complications including anorectal stricture. We report a patient presenting with catastrophic rectal perforation due to severe anal stricture after inappropriate hemorrhoid treatment. A 67-years old man with perianal pain visited the emergency room. The hemorrhoids accompanied by constipation, had tortured him since his youth. Thus he had undergone injection sclerotherapy several times by an unlicensed therapist and hemorrhoidectomy twice at the clinics of private practitioners. His body temperature was as high as 38.5℃. The computed tomographic scan showed a focal perforation of posterior rectal wall. The emergency operation was performed. The fibrotic tissues of the anal canal were excised. And then a sigmoid loop colostomy was constructed. The patient was discharged four days following the operation. This report calls attention to the enormous risk of unlicensed injection sclerotherapy and overzealous hemorrhoidectomy resulting in scarring, progressive stricture, and eventual rectal perforation.
Annals of Coloproctology 02/2013; 29(1):28-30. DOI:10.3393/ac.2013.29.1.28
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This study was designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and postoperative outcomes of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH).
A prospective study was conducted between February and March 2010. PSH was performed with single-window anoscopes for single isolated hemorrhoids, bi-window anoscopes for two isolated hemorrhoids, and tri-window anoscopes for three isolated hemorrhoids or circumferential hemorrhoids. The data pertaining to demographics, preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.
Forty-four eligible patients underwent PSH. Single-window anoscopes were used in 2 patients, and bi- and tri-window anoscopes in 6 and 36 patients. The blood loss in patients with single-window, bi-window, and tri-window anoscopes was 6.0 ml (range 5.0-7.0 ml), 5.0 ml (range 5.0-6.5 ml), and 5.0 ml (4.5-14.5 ml) (P = 0.332). The mean postoperative visual analog scale score for pain was 3 (range, 1-4), 2 (range 1-4), 3 (range 2-6), 1 (range 0-3), 1 (range 0-2) and 2 (range 2-4) at 12 h, days 1, 2, 3, and 7, and at first defecation. The rate of urgency was 9.1%. No patients developed anal incontinence or stenosis. The 1-year recurrence rate of prolapsing hemorrhoids was 2.3%.
Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy appears to be a safe and effective technique for grade III-IV hemorrhoids. Encouragingly, PSH is associated with mild postoperative pain, few urgency episodes, and no stenosis or anal incontinence.
Surgery Today 12/2011; 42(9):868-75. DOI:10.1007/s00595-011-0085-5 · 1.53 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy (CSH) is an effective technique for treating prolapsing hemorrhoids; but urgency and anal stenosis are common postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and postoperative outcomes of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH), compared with CSH.
Seventy-two consecutive patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were divided in a non-randomized manner to undergo either PSH (n = 34) or CSH (n = 38). Intraoperative and postoperative parameters in both groups were collected and compared.
The postoperative visual analog score for pain at first defecation was significantly lower in the PSH group than that in the CSH group (P = 0.001). Fewer patients in the PSH group experienced postoperative urgency, compared with those in the CSH group at 12 h, 1 day, and 7 days after surgery (P = 0.025, P = 0.019, and P = 0.043, respectively). Gas incontinence occurred in 3 patients (7.9%) in the CSH group, but in none of patients in the PSH group (P = 0.242). Postoperative anal stenosis developed in one patient (2.6%) in the CSH group, but in none of the patients in the PSH group (P = 1.0). The 2-year recurrence rate was 2.9 and 5.3%, respectively, in the PSH and CSH groups (P = 1.0).
The 2-year recurrence rate is similar in patients with grade III-IV hemorrhoids treated with PSH or CSH. However, PSH is associated with less postoperative pain, fewer episodes of urgency, and no anal incontinence or anal stenosis.
Techniques in Coloproctology 03/2012; 16(5):337-43. DOI:10.1007/s10151-012-0815-8 · 2.04 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.