Establishing normative data on scapulothoracic musculature using handheld dynamometry.

Armstrong Atlantic State University, USA.
Journal of sport rehabilitation (Impact Factor: 0.86). 11/2009; 18(4):502-20.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Scapular strength deficits have been linked to shoulder dysfunction.
To establish normative data on the scapulothoracic musculature in normal subjects using a handheld dynamometer.
Descriptive normative data study.
Field research.
172 subjects with varying levels of overhead activity.
A handheld dynamometer was used to test the upper, middle, and lower trapezius; rhomboids; and serratus anterior.
A 2-factor ANOVA was performed for each of the muscles by activity level and unilateral ratio by activity-level analyses. Post hoc analysis included multiple pairwise comparisons, using the Dunn-Bonferroni correction method.
Activity level did not significantly affect the unilateral ratios: Elevation:depression was 2.5:1, upward:downward rotation was 1.5:1, and protraction:retraction was 1.25:1. A rank order from strongest to weakest was established through significant comparisons.
The unilateral ratios along with the rank order should be considered when discussing scapular rehabilitation protocols.


Available from: Bryan L Riemann, Jun 02, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We evaluated the relationship between muscle strength and pain in subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). 18 female, 2 male twenty patients (mean age 48.15±5.9 years; range 32 to 60 years) with Stage I and II SIS were enrolled in the study. Upper, middle and lower trapezius, serratus anterior, supraspinatus and anterior deltoid muscle strengths were assessed bilaterally by a handheld dynamometer. Each muscle was assessed 3 times and the mean value of strength was calculated. Pain and functional results were assessed with visual analog scale (VAS), and Constant scores. Modified Constant score was calculated, with the exclusion of pain parameters. Middle trapezius, serratus anterior, supraspinatus and anterior deltoid muscle strengths of the shoulder with positive impingement signs were significantly lower than healthy opposite side (p=0.01, p=0.04, p=0.01, p=0.003). The mean Constant score was 57.46 and the mean VAS 6.85, in shoulders with SIS. There was a significant correlation between VAS and Constant score, without pain assessment (p=0.016, rs= -0.44) In this study we found a relationship between the middle trapezius, serratus anterior, supraspinatus and anterior deltoid muscle weaknesses and pain in SIS. This result indicates that these muscles should be evaluated and strengthened in required cases during the rehabilitation.
    acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica 01/2011; 45(2):79-84. · 0.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Shoulder instability is a common problem in young athletes and can lead to pain and decreased ability to participate in high-level activities. Little is known about the modifiable risk factors for glenohumeral joint instability. Hypothesis: Isometric shoulder strength at baseline would be a modifiable risk factor associated with subsequent first-time anterior instability events. Study Design: Cohort study. Methods: Study participants were freshmen entering the United States Military Academy in June 2006. All participants completed bilateral isometric strength evaluations with a hand-held dynamometer at baseline upon entry into the study. Variables measured included internal and external rotation at 0� (IR0, ER0) and internal and external rotation at 45� of abduction (IR45, ER45). All subjects were followed for subsequent glenohumeral joint instability events until graduation in May 2010. Independent t tests were used to analyze the data. Results: Baseline strength data were available for 1316 shoulders with no prior history of instability, of which 26 went on to have an acute first-time anterior shoulder instability event while the individuals were at the academy. There were no significant differences in mean strength between shoulders that did not go on to develop instability (uninjured; n ¼ 1290) and those that did develop anterior instability (injured; n ¼ 26). The mean strength values in pounds of force for uninjured and injured shoulders, respectively, were as follows: IR0 (49.80 vs 49.29; P ¼ .88), ER0 (35.58 vs 33.66; P ¼ .27), IR45 (47.38 vs 46.93; P ¼ .88), and ER45 (40.08 vs 38.98; P ¼ .59). Conclusion: No association was found between isometric shoulder strength measures at baseline and subsequent first-time anterior glenohumeral joint instability within the high-risk athletic population studied in this prospective cohort. Keywords: isometric shoulder strength; shoulder instability; rotator cuff strength; risk factor
    05/2013; 1(1). DOI:10.1177/2325967113489097
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is common clinical practice to assess muscle strength during examination of patients following shoulder injury or surgery. Strength comparisons are often made between the patient's injured and uninjured shoulders, with the uninjured side used as a reference without regard to upper extremity dominance. Despite the importance of strength measurements, little is known about expected normal baselines of the uninjured shoulder. The purpose of this study was to report normative values for isometric shoulder strength for physically active college-age men and women without history of shoulder injury. University students-546 males (18.8 ± 1.0 years, 75.3 ± 12.2 kg) and 73 females (18.7 ± 0.9 years, 62.6 ± 7.0 kg)-underwent thorough shoulder evaluations by an orthopaedic surgeon and completed bilateral isometric strength measurements with a handheld dynamometer. Variables measured included internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, supine internal rotation and external rotation at 45°, and lower trapezius in prone flexion. Significant differences were found between the dominant and nondominant shoulder for internal rotation, internal rotation at 45°, abduction, and prone flexion in males and in internal rotation at 45° and prone flexion for females (P ≤ 0.01).
    Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach 01/2013; 5(1):17-21. DOI:10.1177/1941738112456280