Article

Feature-based activation and suppression during binocular rivalry

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Vision research (Impact Factor: 2.38). 04/2010; 50(8):743-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.01.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In the past decade, effects of pattern coherence have indicated that perception during binocular rivalry does not result solely from reciprocal inhibitory competition between monocular channels. In this study we were interested in feature selectivity both during dominance and during suppression. The first experiment shows that a suppressed stimulus perceptually appears earlier when it shares features with a visible stimulus than when it does not. Subsequently, our second experiment suggests a reversal of this effect when similarity is exhibited with a suppressed stimulus. These findings hint at a role for both selective enhancing (Experiment 1) and selective inhibitory cortical mechanisms (Experiment 2) in causing image rivalry. From a phenomenological perspective these results suggest that we are not only selectively aware but also selectively unaware of specific features in the visual scene.

0 Followers
 · 
80 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The human visual system is highly proficient in extracting bilateral symmetry from visual input. This paper reviews empirical and theoretical work on human symmetry perception with a focus on recent issues such as its neural underpinnings. Symmetry detection is shown to be a versatile, ongoing visual process that interacts with other visual processes. Evidence seems to converge towards the idea that symmetry detection is subserved by a preprocessing stage involving spatial filters followed by information integration across the visual field in higher-tier cortical areas.
    Symmetry 09/2010; 2(3). DOI:10.3390/sym2031510 · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During binocular rivalry, perception alternates between dissimilar images that are presented dichoptically. It has been argued that perception during the dominance phase of rivalry is unaffected by the suppressed image. Recent evidence suggests, however, that the suppressed image does affect perception of the dominant image, yet the extent and nature of this interaction remain elusive. We hypothesize that this interaction depends on the difference in feature content between the rivaling images. Here, we investigate how sensitivity to probes presented in the image that is currently dominant in perception is affected by the suppressed image. Observers performed a 2AFC discrimination task on oriented probes (Experiment 1) or probes with different motion directions (Experiment 2). Our results show that performance on both orientation and motion direction discrimination was affected by the content of the suppressed image. The strength of interference depended specifically on the difference in feature content (e.g., the difference in orientation) between the probe and the suppressed image. Moreover, the pattern of interference by the suppressed image is qualitatively similar to the situation where this image and the probe are simultaneously visible. We conclude that perception during the dominance phase of rivalry is affected by a suppressed image as if it were visible.
    Journal of Vision 09/2011; 11(10). DOI:10.1167/11.10.7 · 2.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mounting psychophysical evidence suggests that early visual computations are sensitive to the topological properties of stimuli, such as the determination of whether the object has a hole or not. Previous studies have demonstrated that the hole feature took some advantages during conscious perception. In this study, we investigate whether there exists a privileged processing for hole stimuli during unconscious perception. By applying a continuous flash suppression paradigm, the target was gradually introduced to one eye to compete against a flashed full contrast Mondrian pattern which was presented to the other eye. This method ensured that the target image was suppressed during the initial perceptual period. We compared the initial suppressed duration between the stimuli with and without the hole feature and found that hole stimuli required less time than no-hole stimuli to gain dominance against the identical suppression noise. These results suggest the hole feature could be processed in the absence of awareness, and there exists a privileged detection of hole stimuli during suppressed phase in the interocular rivalry.
    PLoS ONE 03/2012; 7(3):e33053. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0033053 · 3.53 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
1 Download
Available from