Article

Fetal Constraint as a Potential Risk Factor for Craniosynostosis

Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90027, USA.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A (Impact Factor: 2.3). 02/2010; 152A(2):394-400. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33246
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Non-syndromic craniosynostosis is multifactorial, and fetal head constraint has been hypothesized as one factor thought to play a role. Data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS), a large multi-site case-control study of birth defects, were used to evaluate associations between four selected factors related to fetal constraint and craniosynostosis: plurality (twins or higher), macrosomia (birth weight >4,000 g), post-term gestational age (> or =42 weeks), and nulliparity (no previous live births). Case infants (n = 675) had craniosynostosis documented either by radiographic evidence or by surgical intervention. Infants with a recognized or strongly suspected single-gene conditions or chromosomal abnormalities were excluded. Control infants (n = 5,958) had no major birth defects and were randomly selected from the same population as case infants. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for the association between these four factors and craniosynostosis, while adjusting for several covariates. We found that plurality and nulliparity were associated with a twofold increased risk for metopic craniosynostosis, and macrosomia had almost twice the risk of developing coronal craniosynostosis. Contrary to our hypothesis, prematurity and low birth weight were also associated with craniosynostosis. In conclusion, these four constraint-related factors were not found to be associated with craniosynostosis when all suture types were combined, though some types of craniosynostosis were associated with individual constraint-related factors.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
128 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose:Craniosynostosis is a common cranial malformation occurring in 1 per 2,000-2,500 births. Isolated defects (nonsyndromic) occur in ~75% of cases and are thought to have multifactorial etiology. It is believed that each suture synostosis is a distinct disease, with varying phenotypes and recurrence rates.Methods:We analyzed family histories of 660 mutation-negative nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients and symptoms in 189 of these patients.Results:The incidence rate of craniosynostosis was highest for first-degree relatives of probands with metopic craniosynostosis (6.4%), followed by those with complex craniosynostosis (4.9%), sagittal craniosynostosis (3.8%), lambdoid craniosynostosis (3.9%), and coronal craniosynostosis (0.7%). Across all suture types, siblings had a greater craniosynostosis incidence rate than parents (7.5 vs. 2.3%). In phenotype comparisons, patients with complex craniosynostosis had the highest frequency of reported symptoms and those with sagittal craniosynostosis had the lowest. Ear infections, palate abnormalities, and hearing problems were more common in complex craniosynostosis patients. Visual problems were more common in coronal craniosynostosis, and metopic craniosynostosis patients noted increased frequency of chronic cough.Conclusion:Our data suggest that the genetic component of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis appears to be suture specific. The incidence rate of craniosynostosis among first-degree relatives varies by suture and family member. Additionally, the phenotype of each suture synostosis shows both unique and shared features.Genet Med advance online publication 26 September 2013Genetics in Medicine (2013); doi:10.1038/gim.2013.134.
    Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 09/2013; DOI:10.1038/gim.2013.134 · 3.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article provides background information about epidemiologic methods and how they can be used to further our understanding of what causes birth defects. It briefly describes basic study designs and advantages and disadvantages of each, provides examples of how epidemiologic studies contribute to our current understanding of the etiologies of birth defects, and makes recommendations for future research.
    European journal of medical genetics 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.03.002 · 1.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report on a young child with intellectual disability and unilateral coronal craniosynostosis leading to craniofacial malformations. Standard karyotype showed an apparently balanced translocation between chromosomes 2 and 15 [t(2;15)(q21;q21.3)], inherited from his mother. Interestingly, array-CGH 180K showed a 3.64 Mb de novo deletion on chromosome 15 in the region 15q21.3q22.2, close to the chromosome 15 translocation breakpoints. This deletion leads to haploinsufficiency of TCF12 gene that can explain the coronal craniosynostosis described in the patient. Additional FISH analyses showed a complex balanced maternal chromosomal rearrangement combining the reciprocal translocation t(2;15)(q21;q21.3), and an insertion of the 15q22.1 segment into the telomeric region of the translocated 15q fragment. The genomic imbalance in the patient is likely caused by a crossing-over that occurs in the recombination loop formed during the maternal meiosis resulting in the deletion of the inserted fragment. This original case of a genomic microdeletion of TCF12 exemplifies the importance of array-CGH in the clinical investigation of apparently balanced rearrangements but also the importance of FISH analysis to identify the chromosomal mechanism causing the genomic imbalance. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 06/2014; 164(6). DOI:10.1002/ajmg.a.36467 · 2.30 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
46 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014