Article

Morphometric analysis of anatomic variables affecting endovascular stent design in patients undergoing elective and emergency repair of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm.

The Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie (Impact Factor: 1.63). 02/2010; 53(1):25-31.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Our objective was to identify morphologic trends in elective and emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This work will inform hospitals with endovascular programs about the diameters and lengths of endostents that should be available to efficiently care for patients with these conditions.
We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing elective (n = 127) and emergency (n = 17) EVAR. Using computed tomography and 3-dimensional reconstructions, we evaluated the following: diameters of the aneurysm (D3), the aorta at the superior mesenteric (D1) and renal (D2a,b,c; 3 levels) levels, the iliac arteries (D5a,b; right and left) and the aortic bifurcation (D4); lengths from the lowest renal artery to the distal aspect of the aortic neck (H1), to the aortic bifurcation (H3), to the right and left iliac bifurcations (H4a,b); and angles of the origin of the common iliac arteries on the transverse plane (A1). We used descriptive statistics of trends within groups and independent sample t tests.
In elective and emergency aneurysm repair, D2max (26, standard deviation [SD] 3, mm v. 30.7 [SD 3] mm), D5a (16 [SD 4.7] mm v. 19.3 [SD 5] mm), D5b (15.3 [SD 4] mm v. 18.1 [SD 3.6] mm), H1 (25.6 [SD 8.6] mm v. 18 [SD 2] mm), H4a (173 [SD 22] mm v. 189.5 [SD 22] mm) and H4b (174 [SD 25] mm v. 190 [SD 14] mm) were significantly different between the 2 groups (p = 0.001, p = 0.006, p = 0.007, p < 0.001, p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively). H3 (118 [SD 17] mm v. 121.5 [SD 13.5] mm) was not significantly different (p = 0.40). In elective patients, A1 identified the right common iliac more frequently anterior relative to the left common iliac (mean 23 degrees , SD 16 degrees).
Significant anatomic differences between elective and emergency patients will require hospitals to stock separate endovascular devices to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms in both groups.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
36 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the aorta is an accepted standard diagnostic procedure for preoperative evaluation and planning of endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (endovascular aortic repair EVAR). The CTA method delivers all relevant anatomical and morphological information on the underlying pathology of the aorta and pelvic axes. Various software solutions are available for multiplanar reconstruction of the CT data for exact measurement of the access routes and landing zones and are essential components of individualized operation planning. The synthesis of all CT-based information allows a safe and exactly targeted release of the stent graft in the aorta. Furthermore, the periprocedural radiation dose can be reduced by a precise preoperative planning of the positions to be irradiated during implantation.
    Der Radiologe 06/2013; · 0.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die Computertomographie-Angiographie (CTA) der Aorta ist als diagnostisches Standardverfahren zur präprozeduralen Evaluation und Planung der endovaskulären Versorgung abdomineller Aortenaneurysmen („endovascular aortic repair“, EVAR) akzeptiert. Dabei liefert die CTA alle relevanten anatomischen und morphologischen Informationen über die zugrundeliegende Pathologie der Aorta und der Beckenachsen. Verschiedene Softwarelösungen zur multiplanaren Rekonstruktion der CT-Daten stehen für die exakte Vermessung der Zugangswege und der Landungszonen zur Verfügung und sind essenzieller Bestandteil der individuellen Operationsplanung. Die Synthese sämtlicher CT-basierter Informationen ermöglicht eine sichere und zielgenaue Freisetzung des Stentgrafts in der Aorta. Ferner kann die periprozedurale Strahlendosis durch eine präzise präoperative Planung der Durchleuchtungspositionen bei der Implantation reduziert werden.
    Der Radiologe 53(6). · 0.47 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from