A Picture's Worth a Thousand Words: Engaging Youth in CBPR Using the Creative Arts

Department of Family Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and action 01/2009; 3(4):349-58. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.0.0090
Source: PubMed


Engaging youth and incorporating their unique expertise into the research process is important when addressing issues related to their health. Visual Voices is an arts-based participatory data collection method designed to work together with young people and communities to collaboratively elicit, examine, and celebrate the perspectives of youth.
To present a process for using the creative arts with young people as a participatory data collection method and to give examples of their perspectives on safety and violence.
Using the creative arts, this study examined and illustrates the perspectives of how community factors influence safety and violence. Visual Voices was conducted with a total of 22 African-American youth in two urban neighborhoods. This method included creative arts-based writing, drawing, and painting activities designed to yield culturally relevant data generated and explored by youth. Qualitative data were captured through the creative content of writings, drawings, and paintings created by the youths as well as transcripts from audio recorded group discussion. Data was analyzed for thematic content and triangulated across traditional and nontraditional mediums. Findings were interpreted with participants and shared publicly for further reflection and utilization.
The youth participants identified a range of issues related to community factors, community safety, and violence. Such topics included the role of schools and social networks within the community as safe places and corner stores and abandoned houses as unsafe places. Visual Voices is a creative research method that provides a unique opportunity for youth to generate a range of ideas through access to the multiple creative methods provided. It is an innovative process that generates rich and valuable data about topics of interest and the lived experiences of young community members.

Download full-text


Available from: Jessica Burke, May 18, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an orientation to research that places value on equitable collaborations between community members and academic partners, reflecting shared decision making throughout the research process. Although CBPR has become increasingly popular for research with adults, youth are less likely to be included as partners. In our review of the literature, we identified 399 articles described by author or MeSH keyword as CBPR related to youth. We analyzed each study to determine youth engagement. Not including misclassified articles, 27 % of percent of studies were community-placed but lacked a community partnership and/or participatory component. Only 56 (15 %) partnered with youth in some phase of the research process. Although youth were most commonly involved in identifying research questions/priorities and in designing/conducting research, most youth-partnered projects included children or adolescents in several phases of the research process. We outline content, methodology, phases of youth partnership, and age of participating youth in each CBPR with youth project, provide exemplars of CBPR with youth, and discuss the state of the youth-partnered research literature.
    American Journal of Community Psychology 06/2012; 51(1). DOI:10.1007/s10464-012-9533-7 · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Although academics are trained in research methods, few receive formal training in strategies for implementing equitable community engaged research. Academics and their community partners can benefit from such direction and assistance as they establish and maintain community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships. Research partners from the University of Pittsburgh, the Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy, and the House of Ruth Maryland, one of the nation's leading domestic violence centers serving Baltimore and the surrounding areas, joined together to design, implement, and evaluate a series of activities to increase local CPBR capacity.Objectives: This article provides an overview of process and findings from two CBPR workshops jointly held for academic and community members and explores specific suggestions from the workshop participants about how to put the CBPR principles into practice to promote community engaged research to address intimate partner violence (IPV).Methods: Twenty-four academic and community partners with experience addressing IPV participated in the two workshops. Facilitators led discussions based on the core CPBR principles. Participants were asked to interpret those principles, identify actions that could help to put the principles into practice, and discuss challenges related to CBPR approaches for IPV research. Observational notes and transcripts of the discussions and workshop evaluations are summarized.Results: The CBPR principles were interpreted and revised through consensus into common language that reflected the group discussion of the core CBPR principles. Workshop participants provided a range of actions for putting the principles into practice and identified the need for sensitivity in relation to IPV research. A majority of participants felt that the workshop generated novel ideas about how they could use CPBR in their own work.Conclusions: Translating CBPR principles into common, action-oriented language is a useful first step when building a new academic-community research partnership.
    Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and action 06/2013; 7(2):115-22. DOI:10.1353/cpr.2013.0025
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In an increasingly visually-oriented world, researchers within and beyond LIS can benefit from exploring, developing and applying creative methods for data collection and research participant engagement. Participatory, arts-involved methods can complement more traditional elicitation techniques, generating rich data that allows researchers to explore participant experiences with socially- and culturally-constructed information practices. This poster presents a novel drawing-based elicitation technique, Information World Mapping (IWM), which was developed to augment traditional qualitative interview methods. IWM combines elements of three established arts-involved methods: information horizons (Sonnenwald, Wildemuth, & Harmon, 2001), relational mapping (Radford & Neke, 2000), and Photovoice (Wang & Burris, 1997). Aiming to enable creative communication about the information world of the research participant as it relates to a social process of interest (e.g., making a health decision or completing a work-related task), IWM guides participants in generating drawings or maps of their personal information worlds, including key interpersonal and institutional relationships. These drawings are then used to facilitate elicitation of participants' own stories about, and interpretations of, their information practices. A case example of IWM in practice is provided, based on a study of teenage parents' health-related information practices.
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 01/2013; 50(1). DOI:10.1002/meet.14505001104
Show more