Article

Effect of brain stem and dorsal vagus complex dosimetry on nausea and vomiting in head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Health Sciences, Medical Dosimetry Program, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists (Impact Factor: 1.26). 03/2011; 36(1):41-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2009.11.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is becoming the treatment of choice for many head and neck cancer patients. IMRT reduces some toxicities by reducing radiation dose to uninvolved normal tissue near tumor targets; however, other tissues not irradiated using previous 3D techniques may receive clinically significant doses, causing undesirable side effects including nausea and vomiting (NV). Irradiation of the brainstem, and more specifically, the area postrema and dorsal vagal complex (DVC), has been linked to NV. We previously reported preliminary hypothesis-generating dose effects associated with NV in IMRT patients. The goal of this study is to relate brainstem dose to NV symptoms. We retrospectively studied 100 consecutive patients that were treated for oropharyngeal cancer with IMRT. We contoured the brainstem, area postrema, and DVC with the assistance of an expert diagnostic neuroradiologist. We correlated dosimetry for the 3 areas contoured with weekly NV rates during IMRT. NV rates were significantly higher for patients who received concurrent chemotherapy. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that chemoradiation cases exhibited a trend towards the same dose-response relationship with both brainstem mean dose (p = 0.0025) and area postrema mean dose (p = 0.004); however, both failed to meet statistical significance at the p ≤ 0.002 level. Duration of toxicity was also greater for chemoradiation patients, who averaged 3.3 weeks with reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-AE), compared with an average of 2 weeks for definitive RT patients (p = 0.002). For definitive RT cases, no dose-response trend could be ascertained. The mean brainstem dose emerged as a key parameter of interest; however, no one dose parameter (mean/median/EUD) best correlated with NV. This study does not address extraneous factors that would affect NV incidence, including the use of antiemetics, nor chemotherapy dose schedule specifics before and during RT. A prospective study will be required to depict exactly how IMRT dose affects NV.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
71 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose To investigate the role of dose to the dorsal vagal complex (DVC) as an emetic stimulus in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy but without chemotherapy. Methods and materials Seventy consecutively treated patients were analyzed for factors associated with nausea. The DVC was contoured on treatment planning scans using a previously published template and mean dose to the structure was analyzed for dose response. Results Nausea occurred in 26 of 70 patients (37%). Two patients (3%) experienced grade 2 nausea, with the remainder having grade 1 nausea. On univariate analysis, dose to the DVC, age, and T-stage were the only significant predictors of nausea. The highest quartile of dose to the DVC (> 3000 cGy) was associated with an incidence of nausea of 67% compared with less than 30% in each of the other 3 quartiles (P = .0255). Conclusions Dose to the DVC of the brainstem appears to correlate with radiation-induced nausea and vomiting. Attentive treatment planning efforts can reduce dose to this critical structure and hopefully minimize the risk of nausea.
    Practical Radiation Oncology. 01/2013;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate potential dose-response relationship between radiation-associated nausea and vomiting (RANV) reported during radiotherapy and candidate nausea/vomiting-associated regions of interest (CNV-ROIs) in head and neck (HNC) squamous cell carcinomas. A total of 130 patients treated with IMRT with squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck were evaluated. For each patient, CNV-ROIs were segmented manually on planning CT images. Clinical on-treatment RANV data were reconstructed by a review of the records for all patients. Dosimetric data parameters were recorded from dose-volume histograms. Nausea and vomiting reports were concatenated as a single binary "Any N/V" variable, and as a "CTC-V2+" variable. The mean dose to CNV-ROIs was higher for patients experiencing RANV events. For patients receiving IMRT alone, a dose-response effect was observed with varying degrees of magnitude, at a statistically significant level for the area postrema, brainstem, dorsal vagal complex, medulla oblongata, solitary nucleus, oropharyngeal mucosa and whole brain CNV-ROIs. RANV is a common therapy-related morbidity facing patients receiving HNC radiotherapy, and, for those receiving radiotherapy-alone, is associated with modifiable dose to specific CNS structures.
    Radiotherapy and Oncology 04/2014; 111(2). · 4.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective This study aimed to correlate planned dose to the nausea center (NC)—area postrema (AP) and dorsal vagal complex (DVC)—with nausea and vomiting symptoms in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) without chemotherapy. We also investigated whether it was possible to reduce doses to the NC without significant degradation of the clinically accepted treatment plan. Methods From November 2004 to April 2009, 37 OPC patients were treated with definitive or adjuvant IMRT without chemotherapy. Of these, only 23 patients had restorable plans and were included in this analysis. We contoured the NC with the assistance of an expert, board-certified neuroradiologist. We searched for correlation between the delivered dose to the NC and patient-reported nausea and vomiting during IMRT. We used one-paired two-sample t test assuming equal variances to compare differences in dose to NC between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. We then replanned each case to determine if reduced dose to the NC could be achieved without compromising coverage to target volumes, increasing unwarranted hotspots, or increasing dose to surrounding critical normal tissues. Results Acute symptoms of nausea were as follows: grade 0 (n = 6), grade 1 (n = 13), grade 2 (n = 3), and grade 3 (n = 1). Patients with no complaints of nausea had a median dose to the DVC of 34.2 Gy (range 4.6–46.6 Gy) and AP of 32.6 Gy (range 7.0–41.4 Gy), whereas those with any complaints of nausea had a median DVC dose of 40.4 Gy (range 19.3–49.4 Gy) and AP dose of 38.7 Gy (range 16.7–46.8 Gy) (p = 0.04). Acute vomiting was as follows: grade 0 (n = 17), grade 1 (n = 4), grade 2 (n = 1), and grade 3 (n = 1). There was no significant difference in DVC or AP dose among those with and without vomiting symptoms (p = 0.28). Upon replanning of each case to minimize dose to the NC, we were, on average, able to reduce the radiation dose to AP by 18 % and DVC by 17 %, while the average dose variations to the planning target volume (PTV) coverage, brainstem, cord, temporal lobes, and cochlea were never greater than 3 %. Hotspots increased by 2 % for three patients while hotspots for the remaining patients were less than 2 % variation. Conclusion For OPC cancer patients treated with IMRT without chemotherapy, dose to AP and DVC may be associated with development of nausea. We were able to show that reducing doses substantially to the NC is achievable without significant alteration of the clinically accepted plan and may reduce the incidence and grade of nausea. As symptoms of nausea can be devastating to patients, one can consider routine contouring and constraining of the NC to minimize chances of having this complication.
    Journal of Radiation Oncology. 11/2012;