Computer-aided volumetry of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity at MDCT.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto University, Japan.
American Journal of Roentgenology (Impact Factor: 2.74). 02/2010; 194(2):398-406. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2583
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of results acquired with computer-aided volumetry software during MDCT of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity.
To evaluate the accuracy of computer-aided volumetry software, we performed thin-section helical CT of a chest phantom that included simulated 3-, 5-, 8-, 10-, and 12-mm-diameter ground-glass opacity nodules with attenuation of -800, -630, and -450 HU. Three radiologists measured the volume of the nodules and calculated the relative volume measurement error, which was defined as follows: (measured nodule volume minus assumed nodule volume / assumed nodule volume) x 100. Two radiologists performed two independent measurements of 59 nodules in humans. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was evaluated with Bland-Altman methods.
The relative volume measurement error for simulated ground-glass opacity nodules measuring 3 mm ranged from 51.1% to 85.2% and for nodules measuring 5 mm or more in diameter ranged from -4.1% to 7.1%. In the clinical study, for intraobserver agreement, the 95% limits of agreement were -14.9% and -13.7% and -16.6% to 15.7% for observers A and B. For interobserver agreement, these values were -16.3% to 23.7% for nodules 8 mm in diameter or larger.
With computer-aided volumetry of ground-glass opacity nodules, the relative volume measurement error was small for nodules 5 mm in diameter or larger. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was relatively high for nodules 8 mm in diameter or larger.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess accuracy of lung nodule volumetry in low-dose CT with application of iterative reconstruction (IR) according to nodule size, nodule density and CT tube currents, using artificial lung nodules within an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. Methods: Eight artificial nodules (4 diameters: 5, 8, 10, and 12 mm; 2 CT densities: -630 HU which represents ground-glass nodule and +100 HU which represents solid nodule) were randomly placed inside a thoracic phantom. Scans were performed with tube current-time product to 10, 20, 30, and 50 mAs. Images were reconstructed with IR and filtered back projection (FBP). We compared volume estimates to a reference standard and calculated the absolute percentage error (APE). Results: APE of all nodules was significantly lower when IR was used with compared for FBP (7.5 ± 4.7% to 9.0 ± 6.9%, P < 0.001). Effect of IR was more pronounced for smaller nodules (P < 0.001). IR showed a significantly lower APE than FBP in ground-glass nodules (P < 0.0001), and the difference was more pronounced at the lowest tube current (11.8 ± 5.9% to 21.3 ± 6.1%, P < 0.0001). The effect of IR was most pronounced for ground-glass nodules in the lowest CT tube current. Conclusions: Lung nodule volumetry in low dose CT by application of IR showed reliable accuracy in a phantom study. Lung nodule volumetry can be reliably applicable to all lung nodules including small, ground-glass nodules even in ultra-low dose CT when application of IR.
    British Journal of Radiology 07/2014; · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the progress in contemporary medicine comprising diagnostic and therapeutic methods, lung cancer is still one of the biggest health concerns in many countries of the world. The main purpose of the study was to evaluate the detection rate of pulmonary nodules and lung cancer in the initial, helical low-dose CT of the chest as well as the analysis of the relationship between the size and the histopathological character of the detected nodules.
    Polish journal of radiology / Polish Medical Society of Radiology. 01/2014; 79:210-8.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in our understanding of the pathology, radiology and clinical behaviour of peripheral lung adenocarcinomas facilitated a more robust terminology and classification of these lesions. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) classification introduced new terminology to better reflect this heterogeneous group of adenocarcinomas formerly known as bronchoalveolar cell carcinoma (BAC). There is now a clear distinction between pre-invasive, minimally invasive and frankly invasive lesions. The radiographic appearance of these ranges from pure ground glass nodules to solid mass lesions. Radiologists must be aware of the new classification in order to work alongside multidisciplinary colleagues to allow accurate staging and treatment. This article reviews the new classification of lung adenocarcinomas. Management options of these lesions with particular focus on radiological implications of the new classification will be reviewed.
    Journal of thoracic disease. 10/2014; 6(Suppl 5):S537-46.