Article

National Efforts to Improve Door-to-Balloon Time

Section of Health Policy and Administration, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 15.34). 12/2009; 54(25):2423-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to determine if enrollment in the Door-to-Balloon (D2B) Alliance, a national quality campaign sponsored by the American College of Cardiology and 38 partner organizations, was associated with increased likelihood of patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) being treated within 90 min of hospital presentation.
The D2B Alliance, launched in November 2006, sought to achieve the goal of having 75% of patients with STEMI treated within 90 min of hospital presentation.
We conducted a longitudinal study of D2B times in 831 hospitals participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI Registry, April 1, 2005, to March 31, 2008.
By March 2008, >75% of patients had D2B times of < or = 90 min, compared with only about one-half of patients with D2B times within 90 min in April 2005. Trends since the launch of the D2B Alliance showed that patients treated in hospitals enrolled in the D2B Alliance for at least 3 months were significantly more likely than patients treated in nonenrolled hospitals to have D2B times within 90 min, although the magnitude of the difference was modest (odds ratio: 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.07 to 1.27).
The D2B Alliance reached its goal of 75% of patients with STEMI having D2B times within 90 min by 2008.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jeremy Craig Green, Oct 08, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
142 Views
  • The Lancet 11/2014; 385(9973). DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62051-1 · 39.21 Impact Factor
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 02/2014; 7(1):9-10. DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001174 · 6.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Improving outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a priority for hospital leadership, clinicians, and policymakers. Evidence suggests links between hospital organizational culture and hospital performance; however, few studies have attempted to shift organizational culture in order to improve performance, fewer have focused on patient outcomes, and none have addressed mortality for patients with AMI. We sought to address this gap through a novel longitudinal intervention study, Leadership Saves Lives (LSL). This manuscript describes the methodology of LSL, a 2-year intervention study using a concurrent mixed methods design, guided by open systems theory and the Assess, Innovate, Develop, Engage, Devolve (AIDED) model of diffusion, implemented in 10 U.S. hospitals and their peer hospital networks. The intervention has three primary components: 1) annual convenings of the ten intervention hospitals; 2) semiannual workshops with guiding coalitions at each hospital; and 3) continuous remote support across all intervention hospitals through a web-based platform. Primary outcomes include 1) shifts in key dimensions of hospital organizational culture associated with lower mortality rates for patients with AMI; 2) use of targeted evidence-based practices associated with lower mortality rates for patients with AMI; and 3) in-hospital AMI mortality. Quantitative data include annual surveys of guiding coalition members in the intervention hospitals and peer network hospitals. Qualitative data include in-person, in-depth interviews with all guiding coalition members and selective observations of key interactions in care for patients with AMI, collected at three time points. Data integration will identify patterns and major themes in change processes across all intervention hospitals over time. LSL is novel in its use of a longitudinal mixed methods approach in a diverse sample of hospitals, its focus on objective outcome measures of mortality, and its examination of changes not only in the intervention hospitals but also in their peer hospital networks over time. This paper adds to the methodological literature for the study of complex interventions to promote hospital organizational culture change.
    Implementation Science 12/2015; 10(1):218. DOI:10.1186/s13012-015-0218-0 · 3.47 Impact Factor