Article

Beyond Histology: Lowering Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody to Improve Renal Allograft Survival in Acute Rejection

Terasaki Foundation Laboratory, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Transplantation (Impact Factor: 3.78). 04/2010; 89(8):962-7. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181cbac02
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The common endpoint in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is functional reversal (creatinine levels). Reduction of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody strength is not commonly considered as an essential endpoint for AMR resolution. The purpose of this study was to determine whether reduction in HLA antibody intensity in patients with histologic AMR reversal influences long-term renal allograft survival.
Renal allograft recipients were included if he or she had a biopsy diagnosis of AMR (between August 2000 and October 2008) and serial evaluation for HLA antibodies prebiopsy and postbiopsy. Antibody reduction was defined as mean fluorescence intensity decrease more than 50% in highest intensity antibody after AMR therapy and the absence of new antibody formation. Patients were treated with plasmapheresis, thymoglobulin/OKT3, and corticosteroids. Survival analysis was performed using STATA/MP v10 (College Station, TX).
Twenty-eight patients were analyzed. Antibody reduction failed to occur in 22 of 28 cases. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Antibody nonresponders had significantly shorter allograft survival time (61.4 months) compared with antibody responders (no failures) (P=0.04, log-rank test).
In conclusion, failure to significantly reduce antibody levels and prevent new formation was strongly predictive of allograft loss. This observation suggests that the therapeutic intervention that reduces antibody production may prolong graft survival in transplantation.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
104 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute antibody-mediated rejection is a diagnostic challenge in renal transplantation medicine. However, it is an important diagnosis to make, since chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) is the main cause of long-term graft loss. Antibody-mediated rejection is diagnosed by detecting donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in the blood in combination with observing typical histomorphological signs in kidney biopsy, as described in the Banff classification. Therapy is based on the removal of DSAs by administering intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), plasmapheresis, or immunoadsorption. Reoccurrence of antibodies is diminished by the use of rituximab, increased immunosuppression, and in some cases additional experimental substances. A combination of these techniques has been shown to be successful in the majority of cases of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. Routine DSA monitoring is warranted for early detection of antibody-mediated rejection.
    Pediatric Nephrology 05/2014; 30(3). DOI:10.1007/s00467-014-2851-2 · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Postkidney transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) have been identified as important contributors to graft loss. Few therapeutic options exist and have been met with limited success. We report outcomes in patients with de novo DSA and graft damage treated with a protocol of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Methods Retrospective analysis of 28 kidney transplant recipients with de novo DSA and graft damage in the form of either chronic graft dysfunction (group 1, n=20) or a recent previous acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) episode (group 2, n=8) prescribed a standard regimen of high-dose (5 g/kg) IVIG dosed over 6 months. Results Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 70 total DSA decreased by 12%at the end of treatment (T1, P=0.14) and by 18%at last follow up (T2, P=0.035) compared with treatment initiation (T0) MFI. The most robust effect was seen in class I DSA (37% decrease at T2 versus T0, P=0.05) and in DSA from patients in group 2 (52% decrease at T2 versus T0, P=0.008). Graft function stabilized in patients in group 2 but continued to decline in those in group 1. Conclusion High-dose IVIG resulted in modest DSA MFI reductions in patients with previous graft damage, with a larger effect occurring in class I DSA in patients with a previous acute AMR. There was no clinical treatment benefit in patients with ongoing chronic graft damage, whereas high-dose IVIG may reduce the risk of chronic graft dysfunction in those with an acute AMR event.
    Transplantation 06/2014; 97(12):1253-1259. DOI:10.1097/01.TP.0000443226.74584.03 · 3.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose of review In the present review, we aim to describe the state of knowledge concerning antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) spectrum and diagnosis criteria before analyzing the present and future promising leads regarding ABMR prognosis markers and treatment. Recent findings Recent studies regarding complement-binding donor-specific antibodies and the molecular approach highlighted the unmet need for stratification tools for prognosis and treatment inside ABMR disease. Summary ABMR is the leading cause of kidney allograft failure. The recent expansion of its spectrum is related to the paradigm of a continuous process, leading insidiously to a chronic form of ABMR and to the progressive acknowledgement of new entities (such as vascular ABMR, subclinical ABMR, C4d-negative ABMR). Considering the global picture of ABMR, the Banff classification gradually refined the diagnosis criteria so that it now describes a clinically relevant and coherent entity. Nevertheless, if the diagnosis mainly relies on conventional assessment, such as histological findings and circulating donor-specific antibodies, these criteria face serious limitations in terms of stratification of patients at risk of graft loss inside ABMR disease. Recently, new promising tools have emerged in order to identify long-term outcomes at the time of the diagnosis of rejection. In this regard, donor-specific antibodies' complement-fixing ability and the molecular approach contributed significantly. Currently, however, no clinically relevant surrogate marker of treatment efficiency is currently available.
    Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 09/2014; 23(6). DOI:10.1097/MNH.0000000000000069 · 4.24 Impact Factor