Article

OPRM1 SNP (A118G): involvement in disease development, treatment response, and animal models.

Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, TRL, PA 19104, USA.
Drug and alcohol dependence (Impact Factor: 3.6). 05/2010; 108(3):172-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.016
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Endogenous opioids acting at mu-opioid receptors mediate many biological functions. Pharmacological intervention at these receptors has greatly aided in the treatment of acute and chronic pain, in addition to other uses. However, the development of tolerance and dependence has made it difficult to adequately prescribe these therapeutics. A common single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), A118G, in the mu-opioid receptor gene can affect opioid function and, consequently, has been suggested to contribute to individual variability in pain management and drug addiction. Investigation into the role of A118G in human disease and treatment response has generated a large number of association studies across various disease states as well as physiological responses. However, characterizing the functional consequences of this SNP and establishing if it causes or contributes to disease phenotypes have been significant challenges. In this manuscript, we will review a number of association studies as well as investigations of the functional impact of this gene variant. In addition, we will describe a novel mouse model that was generated to recapitulate this SNP in mice. Evaluation of models that incorporate known human genetic variants into a tractable system, like the mouse, will facilitate the understanding of discrete contributions of SNPs to human disease.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
114 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our dynamic environment regularly exposes us to potentially life-threatening challenges or stressors. To answer these challenges and maintain homeostasis, the stress response, an innate coordinated engagement of central and peripheral neural systems is initiated. Although essential for survival, the inappropriate initiation of the stress response or its continuation after the stressor is terminated has pathological consequences that have been linked to diverse neuropsychiatric and medical diseases. Substantial individual variability exists in the pathological consequences of stressors. A theme of this Special Issue is that elucidating the basis of individual differences in resilience or its flipside, vulnerability, will greatly advance our ability to prevent and treat stress-related diseases. This can be approached by studying individual differences in "pro-stress" mediators such as corticosteroids or the hypothalamic orchestrator of the stress response, corticotropin-releasing factor. More recently, the recognition of endogenous neuromodulators with "anti-stress" activity that have opposing actions or that restrain stress-response systems suggests additional bases for individual differences in stress pathology. These "anti-stress" neuromodulators offer alternative strategies for manipulating the stress response and its pathological consequences. This review uses the major brain norepinephrine system as a model stress-response system to demonstrate how co-regulation by opposing pro-stress (corticotropin-releasing factor) and anti-stress (enkephalin) neuromodulators must be fine-tuned to produce an adaptive response to stress. The clinical consequences of tipping this fine-tuned balance in the direction of either the pro- or anti-stress systems are emphasized. Finally, that each system provides multiple points at which individual differences could confer stress vulnerability or resilience is discussed.
    01/2015; 1:23-32. DOI:10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.09.006
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite advances in characterizing genetic influences on addiction liability and treatment response, clinical applications of these efforts have been slow to evolve. Although challenges to clinical translation remain, stakeholders already face decisions about evidentiary thresholds for the uptake of pharmacogenetic tests in practice. There is optimism about potential pharmacogenetic applications for the treatment of alcohol use disorders, with particular interest in the OPRM1 A118G polymorphism as a moderator of naltrexone response. Findings from human and animal studies suggest preliminary evidence for the clinical validity of this association; on this basis, arguments for clinical implementation can be made in accordance with existing frameworks for the uptake of genomic applications. However, generating evidence-based guidelines requires evaluating the clinical utility of pharmacogenetic tests. This goal will remain challenging, largely due to minimal data to inform clinical utility estimates. The pace of genomic discovery highlights the need for clinical utility and implementation research to inform future translation efforts. Near-term implementation of promising pharmacogenetic tests can help expedite this goal, generating an evidence base to enable efficient translation as additional gene-drug associations are discovered.
    Addiction science & clinical practice 09/2014; 9(1):20. DOI:10.1186/1940-0640-9-20
    This article is viewable in ResearchGate's enriched format
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: No information is currently available on genetic determinants of short-term response to drug withdrawal in medication overuse headache (MOH). In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the role of 14 polymorphisms in 8 candidate genes potentially relevant for drug addiction (OPRM1, DRD2, DBH, COMT, BDNF, SLC6A4, 5HT2A, and SLC1A2) as predictors for detoxification outcome of MOH patients at 2 months of follow-up. Genotyping was conducted by PCR, PCR-RFLP analysis, or real-time PCR allelic discrimination assay on genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood. The association between gene variants and risk of unsuccessful detoxification was evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. One hundred and eight MOH patients with effective drug withdrawal therapy and 65 MOH patients with unsuccessful detoxification were available for the analysis. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, triptan overuse (odds ratio (OR) 0.271, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.083-0.890, P = 0.031) and TT genotype carriage of DRD2 NcoI (OR 0.115, 95 % CI 0.014-0.982, P = 0.048) emerged as independent predictors for unsuccessful detoxification. In addition, carriers of at least four of the six top-ranked gene variants (P < 0.10) were found at higher odds for unsuccessful detoxification than patients with a parts per thousand currency sign3 high-risk genotypes (OR 3.40, 95 % CI 1.65-7.01, P = 0.001). This exploratory study suggests that DRD2 NcoI may be a genetic determinant of detoxification outcome in MOH patients. Our findings also show that an approach based on the combination of multiple genetic markers could be clinically useful for identification of MOH patients at higher risk for unsuccessful detoxification.
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 08/2014; 17(10). DOI:10.1007/s00228-014-1726-6 · 2.70 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from