Article

Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007-2008.

National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 01/2010; 303(3):242-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.2012
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The prevalence of high body mass index (BMI) among children and adolescents in the United States appeared to plateau between 1999 and 2006.
To provide the most recent estimates of high BMI among children and adolescents and high weight for recumbent length among infants and toddlers and to analyze trends in prevalence between 1999 and 2008.
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2008, a representative sample of the US population with measured heights and weights on 3281 children and adolescents (2 through 19 years of age) and 719 infants and toddlers (birth to 2 years of age).
Prevalence of high weight for recumbent length (> or = 95th percentile of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts) among infants and toddlers. Prevalence of high BMI among children and adolescents defined at 3 levels: BMI for age at or above the 97th percentile, at or above the 95th percentile, and at or above the 85th percentile of the BMI-for-age growth charts. Analyses of trends by age, sex, and race/ethnicity from 1999-2000 to 2007-2008.
In 2007-2008, 9.5% of infants and toddlers (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3%-11.7%) were at or above the 95th percentile of the weight-for-recumbent-length growth charts. Among children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years, 11.9% (95% CI, 9.8%-13.9%) were at or above the 97th percentile of the BMI-for-age growth charts; 16.9% (95% CI, 14.1%-19.6%) were at or above the 95th percentile; and 31.7% (95% CI, 29.2%-34.1%) were at or above the 85th percentile of BMI for age. Prevalence estimates differed by age and by race/ethnic group. Trend analyses indicate no significant trend between 1999-2000 and 2007-2008 except at the highest BMI cut point (BMI for age > or = 97th percentile) among all 6- through 19-year-old boys (odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.17-2.01) and among non-Hispanic white boys of the same age (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.22-2.94).
No statistically significant linear trends in high weight for recumbent length or high BMI were found over the time periods 1999-2000, 2001-2002, 2003-2004, 2005-2006, and 2007-2008 among girls and boys except among the very heaviest 6- through 19-year-old boys.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Margaret Carroll, Jul 01, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
232 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Families Improving Together (FIT) randomized controlled trial tests the efficacy of integrating cultural tailoring, positive parenting, and motivational strategies into a comprehensive curriculum for weight loss in African American adolescents. The overall goal of the FIT trial is to test the effects of an integrated intervention curriculum and the added effects of a tailored web-based intervention on reducing z-BMI in overweight African American adolescents. The FIT trial is a randomized group cohort design the will involve 520 African American families with an overweight adolescent between the ages of 11-16 years. The trial tests the efficacy of an 8-week face-to-face group randomized program comparing M+FWL (Motivational Family Weight Loss) to a comprehensive health education program (CHE) and re-randomizes participants to either an 8-week on-line tailored intervention or control on-line program resulting in a 2 (M+FWL vs. CHE group) x 2 (on-line intervention vs. control on-line program) factorial design to test the effects of the intervention on reducing z-BMI at post-treatment and at 6-month follow-up. The interventions for this trial are based on a theoretical framework that is novel and integrates elements from cultural tailoring, Family Systems Theory, Self-Determination Theory and Social Cognitive Theory. The intervention targets positive parenting skills (parenting style, monitoring, communication); cultural values; teaching parents to increase youth motivation by encouraging youth to have input and choice (autonomy-support); and provides a framework for building skills and self-efficacy through developing weight loss action plans that target goal setting, monitoring, and positive feedback. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Contemporary clinical trials 03/2015; 42. DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2015.03.009 · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Video Games: Parents' Perceptions, Role of Social Media and Effects on Behavior, Edited by Jeffery Graham, 06/2014: pages 17-28; Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publisher.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Exploring opinions and intentions regarding the soon-to-be implemented menu labeling legislation of restaurant owners and management nationwide. Methods: An email message with a link to an online survey was sent to those who were part of the Nation's Restaurant News and Restaurant Hospitality opt-in email lists. Data were collected in January-February 2012. Participants: 178 participants completed the survey. Variables Measured: The survey included: restaurant operation characteristics, restaurant owners' perception about the health impact of the law, restaurant owners' plan to change the menu and anticipated costs, and restaurants owners' attitudes about the new law. Analysis: Fisher's exact tests were performed, with a critical value of 05. 0 = α to determine significance. Results: In general, respondents with knowledge of and experience with menu labeling laws were more likely to respond that they would make menu changes as a result of the law. The majority of respondents, however, either disagreed or were neutral in response to questions about whether the law has the potential to improve health. Conclusions and Implications: Understanding what motivates restaurant owners to comply with the menu labeling law may contribute to efforts to ensure the success of its implementation.