Reduced gray matter volume in normal adults with a maternal family history of Alzheimer disease

University of Kansas School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, 2100 West 36th Ave., Suite 110, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.3). 01/2010; 74(2):113-20. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c918cb
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A consistently identified risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD) is family history of dementia, with maternal transmission significantly more frequent than paternal transmission. A history of maternal AD may be related to AD-like glucose consumption in cognitively healthy subjects. In this cross-sectional study, we tested whether cognitively healthy people with a family history of AD have less gray matter volume (GMV), an endophenotype for late-onset AD, than individuals with no family history, and whether decreases in GMV are different in subjects with a maternal family history.
As part of the Kansas University Brain Aging Project, 67 cognitively intact individuals with a maternal history of late-onset AD (FHm, n = 16), a paternal history of AD (FHp, n = 8), or no parental history of AD (FH-, n = 43), similar in age, gender, education, and Mini-Mental State Examination score, were scanned at 3 T. We used voxel-based morphometry to examine GMV differences between groups, controlling for age, gender, and apoE4.
Cognitively healthy individuals with a family history of late-onset AD had significantly decreased GMV in the precuneus, middle frontal, inferior frontal, and superior frontal gyri compared with FH- individuals. FHm subjects had significantly smaller inferior frontal, middle frontal, precuneus, and lingual gyri compared with FH- and FHp subjects.
Overall, maternal family history of Alzheimer disease (AD) in cognitively normal individuals is associated with lower gray matter volume in AD-vulnerable brain regions. These data complement and extend reports of cerebral metabolic differences in subjects with a maternal family history.

Download full-text


Available from: Jeffrey M Burns, Apr 09, 2014
  • Source
    • "Indeed, unknown genegene and gene-environment interactions are likely to modulate the effect of this genetic factor on brain structure and function, potentially resulting in both overestimation and masking of APOE4 effects (see Donix et al. 2012 for review). In this respect, APOE genotype and family history risk were shown to have independent and/or additive contributions to brain structure (Donix et al. 2010b; Honea et al. 2010, 2011) or metabolism (Mosconi et al. 2007, 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (APOE4) is associated with an increased risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD). Hence, several studies have compared the brain characteristics of APOE4 carriers versus non-carriers in presymptomatic stages to determine early AD biomarkers. The present review provides an overview on APOE4-related brain changes in cognitively normal individuals, focusing on the main neuroimaging biomarkers for AD, i.e. cortical beta-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, hypometabolism and atrophy. The most consistent findings are observed with Aβ deposition as most studies report significantly higher cortical Aβ load in APOE4 carriers compared with non-carriers. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies are rare and tend to show hypometabolism in brain regions typically impaired in AD. Structural magnetic resonance imaging findings are the most numerous and also the most discrepant, showing atrophy in AD-sensitive regions in some studies but contradicting results as well. Altogether, this suggests a graded effect of APOE4, with a predominant effect on Aβ over brain structure and metabolism. Multimodal studies confirm this view and also suggest that APOE4 effects on brain structure and function are mediated by both Aβ-dependent and Aβ-independent pathological processes. Neuroimaging studies on asymptomatic APOE4 carriers offer relevant information to the understanding of early pathological mechanisms of the disease, although caution is needed as to whether APOE4 effects reflect AD pathological processes, and are representative of these effects in non-carriers.
    Neuropsychology Review 08/2014; 24(3). DOI:10.1007/s11065-014-9263-8 · 5.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This trend is consistent with recent reports (Mosconi et al., 2010, 2013) in which greater amyloid burden in healthy older adults with maternal FH was described. This is also consistent with reports in which it was suggested that maternal FH is associated with lower cerebral blood flow (Okonkwo et al., 2012b), lower metabolic rate of glucose (Mosconi et al., 2007, 2009), cerebral atrophy (Honea et al., 2010, 2011), and altered white matter microstructure on diffusion tensor imaging scans (Bendlin et al., 2010). Maternal inheritance of AD is significantly more common than paternal inheritance (Edland et al., 1996). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the relationship between amyloid burden and neural function in healthy adults at risk for Alzheimer's Disease (AD), we used multimodal imaging with [C-11]Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography, [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose, positron emission tomography , and magnetic resonance imaging, together with cognitive measurement in 201 subjects (mean age, 60.1 years; range, 46-73 years) from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention. Using a qualitative rating, 18% of the samples were strongly positive Beta-amyloid (Aβ+), 41% indeterminate (Aβi), and 41% negative (Aβ-). Aβ+ was associated with older age, female sex, and showed trends for maternal family history of AD and APOE4. Relative to the Aβ- group, Aβ+ and Aβi participants had increased glucose metabolism in the bilateral thalamus; Aβ+ participants also had increased metabolism in the bilateral superior temporal gyrus. Aβ+ participants exhibited increased gray matter in the lateral parietal lobe bilaterally relative to the Aβ- group, and no areas of significant atrophy. Cognitive performance and self report cognitive and affective symptoms did not differ between groups. Amyloid burden can be identified in adults at a mean age of 60 years and is accompanied by glucometabolic increases in specific areas, but not atrophy or cognitive loss. This asymptomatic stage may be an opportune window for intervention to prevent progression to symptomatic AD.
    Neurobiology of aging 10/2013; 35(3). DOI:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.09.028 · 4.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This 'ageing-energy-export' network is not only endogenously influenced by metabolites, but more importantly is influenced by a genetic predisposition, such as we know from AD. Studies support that the risk of developing AD is increased when the patient's mother and grandmother were also sufferers, an observation that directly correlates with the maternal inheritance of mitochondria (Honea et al., 2010; Mosconi et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ageing is the main risk factor for the development of dementing neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) and it is accompanied by the accumulation of variations in mitochondrial DNA. The resulting tissue-specific alterations in ATP production and availability cause deteriorations of cerebral clearance mechanisms that are important for the removal of toxic peptides and its aggregates. ABC transporters were shown to be the most important exporter superfamily for toxic peptides, e.g. β-amyloid and α-synuclein. Their activity is highly dependent on the availability of ATP and forms a directed energy-exporter network, linking decreased mitochondrial function with highly impaired ABC transporter activity and disease progression. In this paper, we describe a network based on interactions between ageing, energy metabolism, regeneration, accumulation of toxic peptides and the development of proteopathies of the brain with a focus on Alzheimer's disease (AD). Additionally, we provide new experimental evidence for interactions within this network in regenerative processes in AD.
    Mechanisms of ageing and development 09/2013; 134(10). DOI:10.1016/j.mad.2013.08.007 · 3.51 Impact Factor
Show more