A tutorial on pilot studies: The what, why and how

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada.
BMC Medical Research Methodology (Impact Factor: 2.17). 01/2010; 10(1):1. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Pilot studies for phase III trials - which are comparative randomized trials designed to provide preliminary evidence on the clinical efficacy of a drug or intervention - are routinely performed in many clinical areas. Also commonly know as "feasibility" or "vanguard" studies, they are designed to assess the safety of treatment or interventions; to assess recruitment potential; to assess the feasibility of international collaboration or coordination for multicentre trials; to increase clinical experience with the study medication or intervention for the phase III trials. They are the best way to assess feasibility of a large, expensive full-scale study, and in fact are an almost essential pre-requisite. Conducting a pilot prior to the main study can enhance the likelihood of success of the main study and potentially help to avoid doomed main studies. The objective of this paper is to provide a detailed examination of the key aspects of pilot studies for phase III trials including: 1) the general reasons for conducting a pilot study; 2) the relationships between pilot studies, proof-of-concept studies, and adaptive designs; 3) the challenges of and misconceptions about pilot studies; 4) the criteria for evaluating the success of a pilot study; 5) frequently asked questions about pilot studies; 7) some ethical aspects related to pilot studies; and 8) some suggestions on how to report the results of pilot investigations using the CONSORT format.

Download full-text


Available from: Afisi S Ismaila, Aug 26, 2015

Click to see the full-text of:

Article: A tutorial on pilot studies: The what, why and how

207.38 KB

See full-text
    • "The piloting of the RCT procedures showed excellent process and management (e.g., few missing data, no failures in assessment or intervention administration, no equipment failures, excellent collaboration from referring clinicians). The procedures' assessment was consistent with a successful pilot study with the condition of a minor protocol modification in terms of resources (Thabane et al., 2010). More specifically, the procedures' analysis indicated that recruitment rates could be optimized both in terms of numbers and overall duration of recruitment by increasing the resources (e.g., doubling the time devoted to screening and recruitment from 0.3 to 0.6 FTE). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Major depression is the most prevalent psychiatric disorder with high relapse rates. When mood can improve or fully recover, the neurocognitive difficulties associated with depression often persist, preventing complete functional recovery. They have also been shown to predict relapse. The efficacy of neurocognitive remediation therapy (NCRT) to rehabilitate cognition has been demonstrated in several clinical populations but randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not been conducted in depression. The present study aimed to test the feasibility and to conduct a pilot protocol testing for an RCT of computerized NCRT for inpatients with major depressive episode. The feasibility assessment demonstrated excellent acceptance of randomization and very satisfactory recruitment and compliance rates. The RCT procedures' assessment was overall consistent with a successful pilot study with the condition of protocol modification in terms of resources. Preliminary outcome data suggested specific NCRT efficacy to improve targeted neurocognitive processes in depression.
    The Journal of nervous and mental disease 07/2015; DOI:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000337 · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The primary objectives are: a) to describe the feasibility and acceptability of the study design and process, procedures , resources and management [42]. It is expected that the study procedures, resources and management will be feasible. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Mobility limitations and cognitive impairments which are common with ageing often coexist, causing a reduction in the levels of physical and mental activity and are prognostic of fu- ture adverse health events and falls. Consequently, multi-task training paradigms that simultane- ously address both mobility and cognition benefit healthy ageing are important to consider in re- habilitation as well as primary prevention. Objectives: An exploratory RCT is being conducted to: a) describe the feasibility and acceptability of the study design and process, procedures, resources and management in two game-based dual-task training programs delivered in the community; b) to explore the lived experiences of the study participants who completed their respective exercise programs. A secondary objective is to obtain preliminary data on the therapeutic effectiveness of the two dual-task training programs. Methods: Thirty healthy older community dwelling partici- pants aged 70 - 85 with previous history of falls will be recruited and randomized to either dual- task treadmill walking (experimental group) or dual-task recumbent bicycle (control group). Data analysis: The qualitative data will be analyzed by two investigators using a content analysis ap- proach. For the quantitative data, outcome measures will be collected pre and post intervention and included measures to assess core balance, spatial-temporal gait variables, visual tracking and cognitive function, as well as, balance and gait analysis under dual-task conditions. Discussion:This research will demonstrate the feasibility of the dual-task training programs in the commu- nity, and demonstrate the system’s ability to improve targeted and integrated (dual-task) aspects of balance, mobility, gaze, and cognitive performance. A blended analysis of balance, mobility gaze and cognition will also contribute to a better understanding of the functional consequences of de- cline in physical and mental skills with age. Trial registration: This pilot clinical trial has been registered at Protocol Registration System: NCT01940055.
    Advances in Aging Research 05/2015; 4(3):96-111. DOI:10.4236/aar.2015.43012
  • Source
    • "In this section, we examine the study participants and the study's scientific basis, process, resources, and management , as proposed by Thabane et al. (2010) and adapted for occupational therapy by Tickle-Degnen (2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To provide an example of an occupational therapy feasibility study and evaluate the implementation of a randomized controlled pilot and feasibility trial examining the impact of a sensory-adapted dental environment (SADE) to enhance oral care for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Twenty-two children with ASD and 22 typically developing children, ages 6-12 yr, attended a dental clinic in an urban hospital. Participants completed two dental cleanings, 3-4 mo apart, one in a regular environment and one in a SADE. Feasibility outcome measures were recruitment, retention, accrual, dropout, and protocol adherence. Intervention outcome measures were physiological stress, behavioral distress, pain, and cost. We successfully recruited and retained participants. Parents expressed satisfaction with research study participation. Dentists stated that the intervention could be incorporated in normal practice. Intervention outcome measures favored the SADE condition. Preliminary positive benefit of SADE in children with ASD warrants moving forward with a large-scale clinical trial. Copyright © 2015 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.
    05/2015; 69(3):6903220020p1-6903220020p10. DOI:10.5014/ajot.2015.013714
Show more