Sociodemographic Characteristics of Communities Served by Retail Clinics

RAND Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.85). 01/2010; 23(1):42-8. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.01.090033
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT As a rapidly growing new health care delivery model in the United States, retail clinics have been the subject of much debate and controversy. Located physically within a retail store, retail clinics provide simple acute and preventive services for a fixed price and without an appointment. Some hope that retail clinics can be a new safety-net provider for the poor and those without a primary care physician. To better understand the potential for retail clinics to achieve this goal, we describe the sociodemographic characteristics of the communities in which they operate.
We created an inventory of all retail clinics in the United States and determined the proportion that are in a health professional shortage area (HPSA). We defined each retail clinic's catchment area as all census blocks that were less than a 5-minute driving distance from the clinic. We compared the sociodemographic characteristics of the population within and outside of these retail clinic catchment areas.
Of the 982 clinics in 32 states, 88.4% were in an urban area and 12.5% were in an HPSA (20.9% of the US population lives within an HPSA). Compared with the rest of the urban population, the population living within a retail clinic catchment area has a higher median household income ($52,849 vs $46,080), is better educated (32.6% vs 24.9% with a college degree), and is as likely to be uninsured (17.7% vs 17.0%). In a multivariate model, the census block's median household income had the strongest association with whether the census block was in a retail clinic catchment area (odds ratio, 3.63; 95% CI, 3.26-4.05; median income, > or =$54,779 vs <$30,781, respectively).
We found that relatively few retail clinics are located in HPSAs and that, compared with the rest of the urban population, the population living in close proximity to a retail clinic has a higher income.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The need to plan for future health care and residential adjustments increases with age, growing frailty, and restrictions in coverage of long-term care and will continue to grow with population aging. Older adults' lack of financial preparation for health care costs, insufficient knowledge about available options, and inadequate communication about care-related values has become an increasing public health challenge. This chapter describes a model of Preparation for Future Care (PFC), which encompasses different levels and domains of planning. Research about the extent to which planning is helpful in navigating care transitions is reviewed, and barriers and facilitators of planning including individual, familial, cultural, and national long-term care policy factors are discussed. Planning in the context of dementia and practical approaches that can be taken to enhance PFC is addressed, as well as recommendations for future research in the area of planning and decision making in the context of care transitions.
    Annual review of gerontology & geriatrics 10/2011; 31(1):111-142. DOI:10.1891/0198-8794.31.111
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The existence of one or more comorbidities is common among older adults. These comorbidities can complicate both the treatment of an acute condition and the transitions of care. Examples of such comorbidities include altered mental status, vision and hearing impairment, heart disease, diabetes, Parkinson's disease, arthritis, lung disease, cancer, and stroke. Comorbidities greatly impact the need for home and community-based services or to be appropriate for a range of housing and care options. Other factors that influence decision making around transitions of care include differences in cultural values from those of the dominant American culture such as autonomy, independence, and expectations of family caregiving. Well-coordinated interdisciplinary teams can improve the outcomes of transitions of care for persons with multiple comorbidities and can reduce unnecessary readmissions to the hospital. Case examples are provided to illustrate the increasing complexity of transitions of care for older adults with multiple serious comorbidities.
    Annual review of gerontology & geriatrics 10/2011; 31(1):93-109. DOI:10.1891/0198-8794.31.93
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The advent of transitional care represents one part of a larger movement in health services delivery to improve quality of care and health outcomes and to reduce costs. Related efforts include the development of other chronic care coordination models and the movement toward integrated systems of care, both across institutions providing care and across different medical specialties. Transitional care arguably represents the most complex of care models, given that, by definition, it follows the care needs of individuals over time as they traverse multiple settings (institutional, home, and community-based) and are cared for by a diverse range and combination of health care professionals, paraprofessionals, and family caregivers.In this chapter, we review what we have learned about the "state of the art" of transitional care for older adults. We identify the key components and stakeholders associated with transitional care and offer observations about how to integrate this information into our next steps for planning. To better conceptualize and advance such efforts, we introduce a Systems of Care (SOC) philosophy and a "7P" strategic planning framework that detail the components of transitional care and the strategic pathways and actions needed to ensure that its tenets are broadly adopted and disseminated. Although successful efforts to develop transitional care have been advanced in recent years, we still have a distance to travel before we can ensure that all older adults with complex chronic and acute health conditions will have access to quality transitional care.
    Annual review of gerontology & geriatrics 10/2011; 31(1):231-254. DOI:10.1891/0198-8794.31.231

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Dec 29, 2014