Article

The dual benefits of aposematism: predator avoidance and enhanced resource collection.

School of Biological Sciences, Biosciences, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom.
Evolution (Impact Factor: 4.66). 06/2010; 64(6):1622-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00931.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Theories of aposematism often focus on the idea that warning displays evolve because they work as effective signals to predators. Here, we argue that aposematism may instead evolve because, by enhancing protection, it enables animals to become more exposed and thereby gain resource-gathering benefits, for example, through a wider foraging niche. Frequency-dependent barriers (caused by enhanced conspicuousness relative to other prey and low levels of predator education) are generally assumed to make the evolution of aposematism particularly challenging. Using a deterministic, evolutionary model we show that aposematic display could evolve relatively easily if it enabled prey to move more freely around their environments, or become exposed in some other manner that provides fitness benefits unrelated to predation risk. Furthermore, the model shows that the traits of aposematic conspicuousness and behavior which lead to raised exposure positively affect each other, so that the optimal level of both tends to increase when the traits exist together, compared to when they exist in isolation. We discuss the ecological and evolutionary consequences of aposematism. One conclusion is that aposematism could be a key evolutionary innovation, because by widening habitat use it may promote adaptive radiation as a byproduct of enhanced ecological opportunity.

1 Bookmark
 · 
135 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The first stages of the evolution of aposematic coloration include a region of negative selection. During these stages, individuals with aberrant coloration remain rare, while predators are still not able to associate coloration with inedibility. A simulation model is proposed in which this problematic zone is overcome by individual selection to increase the conspicuousness of inedible prey in a small unisexual population. It is shown that, under this assumption, aposematic coloration develops within a wide range of parameters, such as the cost of inedibility, the cost of coloring, the survival rate of inedible prey after being attacked by a naive predator, and the probability of discovering of differently colored preys by predator, as well as the predator’s learning rate and memory depth. Thus, the early evolution of aposematic coloration does not require any unusual or unique set of circumstances; aposematic coloration, along with concomitant Bates mimicry, inevitably evolve within a wide range of initial conditions. Thus, the early evolution of aposematic coloration does not require any unusual or unique set of circumstances; aposematic coloration, along with concomitant Bates mimicry, inevitably evolves within a wide range of initial conditions. The loss of cryptic coloration by the original form, (e.g., due to a change in food preferences and, thus, the structure of the background coloring, changes in the habitat structure, color mutations, etc.) is one such condition.
    09/2012; 2(5):421-430. DOI:10.1134/S2079086412050039
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The striking colour-pattern variation of some aposematic species is paradoxical because selection by predators is expected to favour signal uniformity. Although the mechanisms allowing for the maintenance of such variation are not well understood, possible explanations include both non-adaptive processes like drift and gene flow; and adaptive processes, such as an interaction between natural and sexual selection, spatial and temporal variation in selection, a link between behaviour or other fitness-related traits and phenotype, and predators’ ability to generalise among different signals. Here we test whether warning-signal polymorphisms, such as that of dyeing poison frogs (Dendrobates tinctorius), could be maintained by differences in detectability among morphs. We did experiments in the wild using wax models with different aposematic colour patterns vs. cryptic ones, and examined the attack rates by wild predators over time. We also tested the detectability of different aposematic morphs by ‘human predators’ under different light environments. We found that cryptic frog models were attacked more than aposematic models, but there were no differences in bird attack rates towards the different aposematic morphs. However, we found that detectability of different morphs depends both on predator experience and light environment. We suggest that the interaction between differential detectability and signal efficiency among morphs in different light conditions could be a mechanism aiding to the maintenance of warning-signal polymorphisms. Our results highlight the importance of considering the light environment at which predators have their first encounters with aposematic prey for future studies on predation in the wild.
    Behavioural Processes 08/2014; 109(B):164-172. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.014 · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • Source

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
38 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014