Medical care of hepatitis B among Asian American populations: perspectives from three provider groups.

Department General Internal Medicine, Ambulatory Treatment & Emergency Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 1465, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 03/2010; 25(3):220-7. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1204-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Physicians can play a significant role in helping to decrease the hepatitis B virus (HBV) burden among Asian Americans. Few studies have described knowledge and practice patterns in the medical community among different provider types regarding HBV and liver cancer.
Our study explores the HBV beliefs, attitudes and practice patterns of medical providers serving Asian American communities.
We conducted three focus groups with primary care providers, liver specialists, and other providers predominantly serving Asian American community. We asked about practices and barriers to appropriate medical care and outreach.
We moderated three focus groups with 23 participants, 18 of whom completed and returned demographic surveys. Twelve were of Asian ethnicity and 13 spoke English as a second language. Only eight screened at least half of their patients, most (72%) using the hepatitis B surface antigen test.
We used grounded theory methods to analyze focus group transcripts.
Participants frequently discussed cultural and financial barriers to hepatitis care. They admitted reluctance to screen for HBV because patients might be unwilling or unable to afford treatment. Cultural differences were discussed most by primary care providers; best methods of outreach were discussed most by liver specialists; and alternative medicine was discussed most by acupuncturists and other providers.
More resources are needed to lower financial barriers complicating HBV care and encourage providing guideline-recommended screenings. Other providers can help promote HBV screening and increase community and cultural awareness.


Available from: Joan Engebretson, Jan 22, 2014
  • Source
    01/2012; Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University., ISBN: 9781921915123
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection may impose an economic burden to patients or their families. The prevention and control of HBV could effectively reduce the burden. However, the management of HBV-related patients has not been well controlled in China. With the development of general practitioner (GP) system in this country, GPs may greatly improve the management of the patients with HBV infection. However, the role of GPs in controlling HBV infection has been rarely studied. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang data and VIP was performed with the following key words: "general practitioner", "family physician", "community management", "community health care workers", "family practice", "hepatitis B virus", "HBV", "HBV vaccination", "HBV prevention", "HBV management", "HBV treatment", "antiviral therapy" and "chronic hepatitis B (CHB)". The information about the GPs-involved prevention, diagnosis and treatment of CHB was reviewed. RESULTS: The reports on the role of GPs in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of HBV infection are few. But the experiences from Western countries demonstrated that GPs could play a significant role in the management of patients with CHB. The importance of GPs is obvious although there are some difficulties in China. GPs and health officials at different levels should work together in the management of patients with CHB. CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of GPs in the management of patients with HBV infection is effective in China. But GPs' knowledge and skills for the control of HBV infection have to be improved currently. GPs' involvement will enforce the management of CHB in China in the near future.
    Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international: HBPD INT 10/2014; 13(5):495-500. DOI:10.1016/S1499-3872(14)60313-1 · 1.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:Adherence to the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) guidelines for the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has not been systematically assessed. We sought to comprehensively evaluate adherence to five key areas of these guidelines. We also evaluated physician and patient factors underlying nonadherence, and predictors of nonadherence such as physician type, patient demographic factors, and phase of CHB infection.METHODS:Nine hundred and sixty-two adult patients were retrospectively identified. Each patient chart was reviewed in detail. The primary outcome was adherence to five areas of the AASLD guidelines: (i) timely alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/hepatitis B virus DNA level checks needed to monitor inactive carrier and immune-tolerant phases; (ii) liver biopsy to guide decisions on initiating treatment; (iii) treatment initiation when indicated; (iv) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening; (v) testing for hepatitis A virus (HAV) immunity, HIV, and hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infections.RESULTS:Sixty percent did not undergo clinically indicated liver biopsies, largely owing to physician nonadherence. Eighty-nine percent of these missed biopsies were needed to further assess possible e-antigen-negative CHB. A high treatment initiation rate was found for the treatment eligible, but 121 patients had unclear treatment eligibility as they warranted, but did not undergo, liver biopsy. Forty-five percent did not have timely HCC screening, although gastroenterology physicians had the highest odds of adherence, and 29% did not have timely CHB lab assessment; patients seen by gastroenterologists had twice the odds compared with primary care physicians of undergoing timely lab monitoring. Thirty-five, 24, and 54% were not tested for HAV, HCV, and HIV co-infections.CONCLUSIONS:Our findings show remarkably poor adherence to AASLD guidelines, particularly in the areas of liver biopsy, timely HCC and ALT monitoring, and testing for co-infection. These findings call for greater efforts to meet physician knowledge gaps, incorporation of decision support tools, and improved communication among providers.Am J Gastroenterol advance online publication, 15 April 2014; doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.72.
    The American Journal of Gastroenterology 04/2014; 109(6). DOI:10.1038/ajg.2014.72 · 9.21 Impact Factor