Patient Factors Associated with Guideline-concordant Treatment of Anxiety and Depression in Primary Care

NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 07/2010; 25(7):648-55. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1216-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To identify associations of patient characteristics (predisposing, enabling and need factors) with guideline-concordant care for anxiety and depression in primary care.
Analysis of data from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).
Seven hundred and twenty-one patients with a current anxiety or depressive disorder, recruited from 67 general practitioners (GPs), were included.
Diagnoses according to the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) were made using a structured and widely validated assessment. Socio-demographic and enabling characteristics, severity of symptoms, disability, (under treatment for) chronic somatic conditions, perceived need for care, beliefs and evaluations of care were measured by questionnaires. Actual care data were derived from electronic medical records. Criteria for guideline-concordant care were based on general practice guidelines, issued by the Dutch College of General Practitioners.
Two hundred and eighty-one (39%) patients received guideline-concordant care. High education level, accessibility of care, comorbidity of anxiety and depression, and severity and disability scores were positively associated with receiving guideline-concordant care in univariate analyses. In multivariate multi-level logistic regression models, significant associations with the clinical need factors disappeared. Positive evaluations of accessibility of care increased the chance (OR = 1.31; 95%-CI = 1.05-1.65; p = 0.02) of receiving guideline-concordant care, as well as perceiving any need for medication (OR = 2.99; 95%-CI = 1.84-4.85; p < 0.001), counseling (OR = 2.25; 95%-CI = 1.29-3.95; p = 0.005) or a referral (OR = 1.83; 95%-CI = 1.09-3.09; p = 0.02). A low educational level decreased the odds (OR = 0.33; 95%-CI = 0.11-0.98; p = 0.04) of receiving guideline-concordant care.
This study shows that education level, accessibility of care and patients' perceived needs for care are more strongly associated with the delivery of guideline-concordant care for anxiety or depression than clinical need factors. Initiatives to improve GPs' communication skills around mental health issues, and to improve recognition of people suffering from anxiety disorders, could increase the number of patients receiving treatment for depression and anxiety in primary care.


Available from: Peter F M Verhaak, Apr 17, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anxiety disorders are common mental health problems in the community, and primary care has a predominant role in the diagnosis and treatment of these conditions. While most patients are treated with pharmacotherapy, clinical practice guidelines recommendations also comprise psychotherapy interventions. The aims of this study were: (a) to examine access to psychotherapy for anxiety disorders in a sample of primary care patients; and (b) to examine individual factors associated with access to psychotherapy. Data were drawn from the “Dialogue” project, a large primary care study conducted in 67 primary care clinics. After a mental health screening, patients with anxiety or depressive symptoms were invited to participate in a telephone/Web structured interview to assess Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders–Fourth Edition (DSM–IV) anxiety and depressive disorders, as well as service utilization. In our sample, a total of 740 adults met DSM–IV criteria for panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder or social anxiety disorder in the past 12 months. Nearly half of the respondents with anxiety disorders had received a form of psychotherapy or counselling in the past 12 months, and 20% of respondents reported at least 12 sessions with the same health care professional. Individual correlates of access to psychotherapy, based on a logistic regression model, included being a woman, less than 60 years old, a university education level, supplementary insurance and having a comorbid depression episode. These findings emphasize the need to improve access to psychotherapy for individuals with anxiety disorders in primary care and to reduce disparities in access to psychotherapy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
    05/2014; 55(2):60. DOI:10.1037/a0036317
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anxiety and depression are not always diagnosed and treated in primary care as has been recommended. A tailored implementation programme, which addresses key barriers for change by targeted interventions, may help to remedy this. The effectiveness of an individually tailored implementation programme, additional to standardised training and feedback on the recognition and treatment of patients with anxiety or depression in general practice, was examined in a cluster randomised controlled trial. Participants were 46 general practitioners (GPs) from 23 general practices (12 intervention, 11 control) and 444 patients aged 18 years or older (198 intervention, 246 control) who screened positive on the extended Kessler 10. In the control group, GPs received a 1-day training in guidelines for recognition and stepped treatment for anxiety and depression. Ten months after the training session, GPs received feedback on their performance over the preceding 6 months. In the intervention group, GPs received the same training and feedback as those in the control condition; in addition, they were offered support, tailored to perceived local barriers to change. The support was delivered in the format of peer group supervisions and personalised telephone consultations. Data were based on an audit of patient records and patient surveys at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. The tailored implementation programme led to recognition of a higher proportion of patients presenting with anxiety and depression (42% versus 31%; odds ratio (OR) = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.01-2.53), more consultations after recognition (IRR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.14-2.78) and did not lead to more prescription of antidepressants (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.52-2.19) or referral to specialist mental health services (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 0.72-3.64). Patients in the intervention group reported better accessibility of care (effect size (ES) = 0.4; p < 0.05) and provision of information and advice (ES = 0.5; p < 0.05). A tailored implementation programme may enhance the recognition and treatment of patients with anxiety or depression. Further development and evaluation of the programme is warranted to determine its cost-effectiveness. Dutch Trial Register identifier NTR1912 .
    Implementation Science 12/2015; 10(1):210. DOI:10.1186/s13012-015-0210-8 · 3.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A high prevalence of mental and physical ill health among refugees resettled in the Netherlands has been reported. With this study we aim to assess the quality of primary healthcare for resettled refugees in the Netherlands with chronic mental and non-communicable health problems, we examined: a) general practitioners' (GP) recognition of common mental disorders (CMD) (depression and anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms); b) patients' awareness of diabetes type II (DMII) and hypertension (HT); and c) GPs' adherence to guidelines for CMD, DMII and HT.
    BMC Family Practice 09/2014; 15(1):160. DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-15-160 · 1.74 Impact Factor