[Evaluation of platelet indices for differential diagnosis of thrombocytosis by ADVIA 120].

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (Impact Factor: 0.72). 12/2009; 29(6):505-9. DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.6.505
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT For the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET), no single clinical or laboratory finding of diagnostic value is available and a differential diagnosis of other myeloproliferative neoplasms or reactive thrombocytosis (RT) is needed. Following recent developments in automated blood cell analyzers, various platelet indices can now be measured. In this study, we analyzed whether platelet counts and 6 platelet indices can be used for the differentiation of ET from RT in patients with a platelet count of 600x10(3)/microL or more.
The subjects studied were 31 patients with ET and 224 patients with RT. The platelet counts, mean platelet volume (MPV), plateletcrit (PCT), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet mass (MPM), mean platelet component concentration (MPC) and large platelets (LPLT) were measured by ADVIA 120 (Bayer Diagnostics, USA). The mean values of each item were compared between the two patient groups and the sensitivity and specificity of each item in the diagnosis of ET were determined by ROC curve analysis.
In essential thrombocythemia, all parameters except MPC were significantly higher than in reactive thrombocytosis. For the diagnosis of ET, the sensitivity and specificity were: 74.2% and 84.4%, when the platelet count was > or = 820 x 10(3)/microL; 80.6% and 80.0%, when the plateletcrit was > or = 0.63%; and 64.5% and 99.1%, respectively, when LPLT was > or = 23 x 10(3)/microL.
The platelet counts and platelet indices are useful for the differential diagnosis of thrombocytosis. The plateletcrit and LPLT are particularly useful for the diagnosis of ET when the platelet count is markedly increased.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thrombocytopenia is caused by insufficient production and excessive destruction of platelets. Recent improvement of automated blood cell analyzers has allowed measurement of several platelet parameters, providing better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of thrombocytopenia. We investigated the significance of platelet parameters in thrombocytopenic patients. Thrombocytopenic patients (platelet <100 × 10/μl) who were newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia and primary immune thrombocytopenia were enrolled, and platelet, mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, platelet crit, mean platelet component, mean platelet mass, and large platelet count were measured, and the percentages of large platelets were calculated. The parameters were also measured in the reference population. The mean values of each parameter were as follows: platelet, 259 × 10/μl; mean platelet volume, 7.9 fl; platelet distribution width, 51.3%; platelet crit, 0.20%; mean platelet component, 26.0 g/dl; mean platelet mass, 1.9 pg; large platelet, 4.7 × 10/μl; large platelet percentage, 1.7%. In comparison with acute myeloid leukemia patients, patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia showed significantly higher mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, mean platelet component, mean platelet mass, large platelet, and large platelet % (P < 0.05). Because of increased destruction of platelets, primary immune thrombocytopenia patients have increased mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, mean platelet component, mean platelet mass, large platelet, and large platelet percentage compared with acute myeloid leukemia patients who have ineffective platelet production. Parameters measured by automated analyzer provide better understanding of thrombopoiesis in the bone marrow and the status of the peripheral blood in the clinical field.
    Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis: an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis 04/2014; 25(3):221-225. · 1.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of mean platelet volume (MPV) in acute appendicitis (AA). Our study was carried out in 206 healthy control groups and 226 patients who had a preliminary diagnosis of AA. A statistically significant decrease in MPV was noted in patients with AA compared with healthy controls (P < .001). The best MPV level cutoff point for AA was 7.6 fL, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 73%, 84%, 84%, and 74%, respectively. As the MPV value is included in the complete blood count (CBC) analysis, it increases the sensitivity and NPVs of white blood cell (WBC) in AA diagnosis without the need for extra analyses, loss of time, or cost increase. Therefore, we believe that the MPV value should also be taken into consideration along with the WBC in every patient with suspected AA.
    Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis 05/2010; 17(4):362-6. · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neutrophil and platelet activation are consistently found in essential thrombocythemia (ET), but the techniques employed to demonstrate such abnormalities are complex. To ascertain whether the ADVIA 120 analyzer can be employed to assess neutrophil and platelet activation status in ET, 55 such patients and the same number of matched healthy individuals were studied and the results correlated with neutrophil CD11b and platelet P-selectin expressions measured by flow cytometry. Compared with controls, ET patients had significantly higher values of neutrophil myeloperoxidase index (MPXI), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and platelet component distribution width, and significantly lower values of neutrophil lobularity index and mean platelet component (MPC). Patients with the JAK2 mutation had significantly lower values of MPC and higher values of MPV and PDW than those with wild-type allele. A positive correlation was observed between MPXI and neutrophil CD11b expression and a negative correlation between MPC and platelet P-selectin expression. The intensity of the agreement between the variables obtained by the two methods was moderate. These results support the possible value of MPC as surrogate parameter of platelet activation in ET.
    Platelets 11/2011; 23(5):336-43. · 2.24 Impact Factor