Distribution of adipose-derived stem cells in adipose tissues from human cadavers.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi Shinjuku-ku Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.44). 10/2010; 63(10):1717-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.10.020
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) possess multipotency in vivo and in vitro, and thus are thought to be very promising precursors for use in regenerative medicine. ASCs can be concentrated from adipose tissue by enzymatic digestion and transplanted to increase angiogenesis or for cosmesis. ASC transplants are now being performed in a clinical setting. Although data on ASCs are extensive, the distribution of ASCs in human fat tissue has not been fully clarified. Thus, it is important to identify the distribution of ASCs to obtain cell populations rich in ASCs for clinical use.
ASCs express CD34, a cell surface marker. As CD34 is also expressed by endothelial cells, we immunohistochemically stained 2-μm-thick serial paraffin sections of fat tissue obtained from various parts of formalin-fixed cadavers with anti-CD31 and anti-CD34 antibodies to distinguish ASCs from endothelial cells.
CD34(+)/CD31(-) cells were mainly found in connective tissue tracts and perivascularly. Among fat tissues obtained from various sites, fat tissues in the thoracic back and lower abdomen were richest in CD34(+)/CD31(-) cells.
The concentrations of CD34(+)/CD31(-) cells in adipose tissues differ between sites. The sites most highly enriched for ASCs were identified, and it is now possible to select the best sites for collection of ASCs for transplantation.

  • Source
    International Journal of Morphology 03/2013; 31(1):64-69. · 0.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adipose tissue is a dynamic ‘hard-working’ tissue that awaits extensive studies. It does not merely function as a fat-storage region; adipose tissue also plays a major role in the formation of body shapes, which determine attractiveness in humans. Moreover, adipose tissue secretes molecules that direct brain processes. The importance of adipose tissue is not limited to its physiologic roles; it also has a wide potential for use in the treatment of several disorders, and is also the most abundant, reproducible, and accessible tissue for cell therapists. With the support of basic and clinical studies, the significance of adipose tissue might be widely acknowledged in the near future.
    08/2011: pages 1-12;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To bring insights into neurofibroma biochemistry, a comprehensive secretome analysis was performed on cultured human primary Schwann cells isolated from surgically resected plexiform neurofibroma and from normal nerve tissue. Using a combination of SDS-PAGE and high precision LC-MS/MS, 907 proteins were confidently identified in the conditioned media of Schwann cell cultures combined. Label free proteome profiling revealed consistent release of high levels of 22 proteins by the four biological replicates of NF1 Schwann cell cultures relative to the two normal Schwann cell cultures. Inversely, 9 proteins displayed decreased levels in the conditioned media of NF1 relative to normal Schwann cells. The proteins with increased levels included proteins involved in cell growth, angiogenesis and complement pathway while proteins with decreased levels included those involved in cell adhesion, plasminogen pathway and extracellular matrix remodeling. Retinoic acid receptor responder protein-1 (RARRES1), previously described as an integral membrane tumor suppressor, was found exclusively secreted by NF1 Schwann cells but not by normal Schwann cells. All-trans retinoic acid modulated secretion of RARRES1 in a dose dependent manner. This study shows altered secretion of key proteins in NF1 derived Schwann cells. The potential implication of these proteins in neurofibroma biology is discussed.
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 01/2012; 13(7):9380-99. · 2.46 Impact Factor