Article

Tuning microbial hosts for membrane protein production.

Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 14, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Microbial Cell Factories (Impact Factor: 3.31). 01/2009; 8:69. DOI:10.1186/1475-2859-8-69
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The last four years have brought exciting progress in membrane protein research. Finally those many efforts that have been put into expression of eukaryotic membrane proteins are coming to fruition and enable to solve an ever-growing number of high resolution structures. In the past, many skilful optimization steps were required to achieve sufficient expression of functional membrane proteins. Optimization was performed individually for every membrane protein, but provided insight about commonly encountered bottlenecks and, more importantly, general guidelines how to alleviate cellular limitations during microbial membrane protein expression. Lately, system-wide analyses are emerging as powerful means to decipher cellular bottlenecks during heterologous protein production and their use in microbial membrane protein expression has grown in popularity during the past months.This review covers the most prominent solutions and pitfalls in expression of eukaryotic membrane proteins using microbial hosts (prokaryotes, yeasts), highlights skilful applications of our basic understanding to improve membrane protein production. Omics technologies provide new concepts to engineer microbial hosts for membrane protein production.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
74 Views
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Microbial ∆ ( 1 ) -dehydrogenation is one of the most important transformations in the synthesis of steroid hormones. In this study, a 3-ketosteroid-∆(1)-dehydrogenase (kstD(F)) involved in fusidane antibiotic biosynthesis from Aspergillus fumigatus CICC 40167 was characterized for use in steroid transformation. KstD(F) encodes a polypeptide consisting of 637 amino acid residues. It shows 51% amino acid identity with a kstD from Thermomicrobium roseum DSM 5159. Expression of kstD(F) in Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris showed that all kstD(F) activity is located in the cytoplasm. This indicates that it is a soluble intracytoplasmic enzyme, unlike most kstDs from bacteria, which are membrane-bound. The expression of kstD(F) was performed in P. pastoris, both intracellularly and extracelluarly. The intracellularly expressed protein displayed good activity in steroid transformation, while the extracellularly expressed protein showed nothing. Interestingly, the engineered P. pastoris KM71 (KM71(I)) and GS115 (GS115(I)) showed different transformation activities for 4-androstene-3,17-dione (AD) when kstD(F) was expressed intracellularly. Under the same conditions, KM71(I) was found capable of transforming 1.0 g/l AD to 1,4-androstadiene-3,17-dione (ADD), while GS115(I) could transform 1.5 g/l AD to both ADD and boldenone (BD). The production of BD is attributed to a 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in P. pastoris GS115(I), which catalyzes the reversible reaction between C17-one and C17-alcohol of steroids. The conversion of AD by GS115(I) and KM71(I) may provide alternative means of preparing ADD or BD. In brief, we show here that kstD(F) is a promising enzyme in steroid ∆ ( 1 ) -dehydrogenation that is propitious to construct genetically engineered steroid-transforming recombinants by heterologous overexpression.
    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 01/2012; 96(1):133-42. · 3.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Low yields of recombinant expression represent a major barrier to the physical characterization of membrane proteins. Here, we have identified genes that globally enhance the production of properly folded G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in Escherichia coli. Libraries of bacterial chromosomal fragments were screened using two separate systems that monitor: (i) elevated fluorescence conferred by enhanced expression of GPCR-GFP fusions and (ii) increased binding of fluorescent ligand in cells producing more active receptor. Three multi-copy hits were isolated by both methods: nagD, encoding the ribonucleotide phosphatase NagD; a fragment of nlpD, encoding a truncation of the predicted lipoprotein NlpD, and the three-gene cluster ptsN-yhbJ-npr, encoding three proteins of the nitrogen phosphotransferase system. Expression of these genes resulted in a 3- to 10-fold increase in the yields of different mammalian GPCRs. Our data is consistent with the hypothesis that the expression of these genes may serve to maintain the integrity of the bacterial periplasm and to provide a favorable environment for proper membrane protein folding, possibly by inducing a fine-tuned stress response and/or via modifying the composition of the bacterial cell envelope.
    Metabolic Engineering 05/2012; 14(5):591-602. · 6.86 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the increasing demand for biopharmaceutical proteins and industrial enzymes, it is necessary to optimize the production by microbial fermentation or cell cultures. Yeasts are well established for the production of a wide range of recombinant proteins, but there are also some limitations; e.g., metabolic and cellular stresses have a strong impact on recombinant protein production. In this work, we investigated the effect of the specific growth rate on the production of two different recombinant proteins. Our results show that human insulin precursor is produced in a growth-associated manner, whereas α-amylase tends to have a higher yield on substrate at low specific growth rates. Based on transcriptional analysis, we found that the difference in the production of the two proteins as function of the specific growth rate is mainly due to differences in endoplasmic reticulum processing, protein turnover, cell cycle, and global stress response. We also found that there is a shift at a specific growth rate of 0.1 h(-1) that influences protein production. Thus, for lower specific growth rates, the α-amylase and insulin precursor-producing strains present similar cell responses and phenotypes, whereas for higher specific growth rates, the two strains respond differently to changes in the specific growth rate.
    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 02/2013; · 3.69 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
17 Downloads
Available from
Oct 9, 2012