Article

Diminished neural processing of aversive and rewarding stimuli during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment.

Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom.
Biological psychiatry (Impact Factor: 8.93). 03/2010; 67(5):439-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are popular medications for anxiety and depression, but their effectiveness, particularly in patients with prominent symptoms of loss of motivation and pleasure, has been questioned. There are few studies of the effect of SSRIs on neural reward mechanisms in humans.
We studied 45 healthy participants who were randomly allocated to receive the SSRI citalopram, the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor reboxetine, or placebo for 7 days in a double-blind, parallel group design. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the neural response to rewarding (sight and/or flavor of chocolate) and aversive stimuli (sight of moldy strawberries and/or an unpleasant strawberry taste) on the final day of drug treatment.
Citalopram reduced activation to the chocolate stimuli in the ventral striatum and the ventral medial/orbitofrontal cortex. In contrast, reboxetine did not suppress ventral striatal activity and in fact increased neural responses within medial orbitofrontal cortex to reward. Citalopram also decreased neural responses to the aversive stimuli conditions in key "punishment" areas such as the lateral orbitofrontal cortex. Reboxetine produced a similar, although weaker effect.
Our findings are the first to show that treatment with SSRIs can diminish the neural processing of both rewarding and aversive stimuli. The ability of SSRIs to decrease neural responses to reward might underlie the questioned efficacy of SSRIs in depressive conditions characterized by decreased motivation and anhedonia and could also account for the experience of emotional blunting described by some patients during SSRI treatment.

1 Bookmark
 · 
112 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Neural responses to rewarding food cues are signif-icantly different in the fed vs. fasted (.8 h food-deprived) state. However, the effect of eating to satiety after a shorter (more natural) intermeal interval on neural responses to both rewarding and aver-sive cues has not been examined. Objective: With the use of a novel functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) task, we investigated the effect of satiation on neural responses to both rewarding and aversive food tastes and pictures. Design: Sixteen healthy participants (8 men, 8 women) were scanned on 2 separate test days, before and after eating a meal to satiation or after not eating for 4 h (satiated vs. premeal). fMRI blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) signals to the sight and/or taste of the stimuli were recorded. Results: A whole-brain cluster-corrected analysis (P , 0.05) showed that satiation attenuated the BOLD response to both stimulus types in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), orbitofrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, hypothalamus, and insula but increased BOLD activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC; local maxima corrected to P # 0.001). A psychophysiological interaction analysis showed that the vmPFC was more highly connected to the dlPFC when individuals were exposed to food stimuli when satiated than when not satiated. Conclusions: These results suggest that natural satiation attenuates activity in reward-related brain regions and increases activity in the dlPFC, which may reflect a " top down " cognitive influence on satiation. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02298049. Am J Clin Nutr doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.097543.
    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 01/2015; · 6.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Exposure of satiated subjects to food related stimuli has been shown to decrease neural activation in areas involved in the control of eating behaviour. In the present study we investigated whether hunger or satiation affected BOLD fMRI responses to both rewarding and aversive visual and taste stimuli in healthy volunteers. Sixteen participants (8 male, 8 female) completed an fMRI task that has been used previously to assess the effects of serotonergic and dopaminergic drugs on reward processes. Participants were scanned before and after either eating to satiation or hungry (on separate test days); BOLD fMRI responses and subjective ratings, to the sight and/or taste of chocolate (rewarding) or the sight and/or taste of mouldy strawberries (aversive) were recorded. Analysis of VAS ratings of subjective pleasantness and wanting of the stimuli, suggests a dissociation between reward and aversion, as satiation attenuated responses to chocolate but not mouldy strawberries. The fMRI results showed differences in the BOLD response between the satiated and hungry conditions that were dependent on the nature of the stimuli (rewarding vs. aversive) in the following regions: orbital frontal cortex, insula, nucleus accumbens, caudate, putamen, hippocampus, amygdala and brainstem. The results provide a profile of satiation in a model of reward processing which may be of value in future studies to assess the mechanism of action of novel drugs to treat obesity and psychiatric disorders.
    Appetite 10/2012; 59(2):635. · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) transporter (5-HTT) is believed to play a key role in both normal and pathological psychological states. Much previous data suggest that the s allele of the polymorphic regulatory region of the 5-HTT gene promoter is associated with reduced 5-HTT expression and vulnerability to psychiatric disorders, including anxiety and depression. In comparison, the l allele, which increases 5-HTT expression, is generally considered protective. However, recent data link this allele to both abnormal 5-HT signalling and psychopathic traits. Here, we studied the processing of aversive and rewarding cues in transgenic mice that over-express the 5-HTT (5-HTTOE mice). Compared with wild-type mice, 5-HTTOE mice froze less in response to both a tone that had previously been paired with footshock, and the conditioning context. In addition, on a decision-making T-maze task, 5-HTTOE mice displayed reduced preference for a larger, delayed reward and increased preference for a smaller, immediate reward, suggesting increased impulsiveness compared with wild-type mice. However, further inspection of the data revealed that 5-HTTOE mice displayed a relative insensitivity to reward magnitude, irrespective of delay. In contrast, 5-HTTOE mice appeared normal on tests of spatial working and reference memory, which required an absolute choice between options associated with either reward or no reward. Overall, the present findings suggest that 5-HTT over-expression results in a reduced sensitivity to both positive and negative reinforcers. Thus, these data show that increased 5-HTT expression has some maladaptive effects, supporting recent suggestions that l allele homozygosity may be a potential risk factor for disabling psychiatric traits.
    European Journal of Neuroscience 10/2014; · 3.67 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
32 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014