The association between concurrent psychotropic medications and self-reported adherence with taking a mood stabilizer in bipolar disorder

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (Impact Factor: 2.19). 01/2010; 25(1):47-54. DOI: 10.1002/hup.1077
Source: PubMed


Multiple psychotropic medications are routinely prescribed to treat bipolar disorder, creating complex medication regimens. This study investigated whether the daily number of psychotropic medications or the daily number of pills were associated with self-reported adherence with taking a mood stabilizer.
Patients self-reported their mood and medications taken daily for about 6 months. Adherence was defined as taking at least one pill of any mood stabilizer daily. Univariate general linear models (GLMs) were used to estimate if adherence was associated with the number of daily medications and the number of pills, controlling for age. The association between mean daily dosage of mood stabilizer and adherence was also estimated using a GLM.
Three hundred and twelve patients (mean age 38.4 +/- 10.9 years) returned 58,106 days of data and took a mean of 3.1 +/- 1.6 psychotropic medications daily (7.0 +/- 4.2 pills). No significant association was found between either the daily number of medications or the daily number of pills and adherence. For most mood stabilizers, patients with lower adherence took a significantly smaller mean daily dosage.
The number of concurrent psychotropic medications may not be associated with adherence in bipolar disorder. Patients with lower adherence may be taking smaller dosages of mood stabilizers.

Download full-text


Available from: Greg Murray, Oct 17, 2014
  • Source
    • "It is noteworthy that over 80% of the patients with a stable combination were taking three or less drugs. A relatively small number of drugs may facilitate long-term use, and there may be an upper limit on the number of daily drugs beyond which adherence decreases (Bauer et al. 2009; Robertson et al. 2008). Polypharmacy regimens that require frequent dosing, have dietary or time requirements, or are expensive may contribute to nonadherence (Cramer et al. 1989; Ingersoll and Cohen 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The objective of this study is to investigate drug treatment patterns in bipolar disorder using daily data from patients who received treatment as usual. Methods Patients self-reported the drugs taken daily for about 6 months. Daily drug use and drug combinations were determined for each patient, both by the specific drugs and by medication class. The drug load was calculated for all drugs taken within a medication class. Results and discussion Four hundred fifty patients returned a total of 99,895 days of data (mean 222.0 days). The most frequently taken drugs were mood stabilizers. Of the 450 patients, 353 (78.4%) took a stable drug combination for ≥50% of days. The majority of patients were taking polypharmacy, including 75% of those with a stable combination. Only a small number of drugs were commonly taken within each medication class, but there were a large number of unique drug combinations: 52 by medication class and 231 by specific drugs. Eighty percent of patients with a stable combination were taking three or less drugs daily. Patients without a stable combination took drugs but made frequent changes. Taking more than one drug within a medication class greatly increased the drug load. To summarize, (1) patients were more likely to take a mood stabilizer than any other drug; (2) although most patients were taking polypharmacy, there were no predominant drug regimens even among those taking a stable combination; and (3) most patients with a stable combination take a relatively small number of drugs daily. The wide variation in drug regimens and numerous possible drug combinations suggest that more evidence is needed to optimize treatment of bipolar disorder.
    05/2013; 1(1). DOI:10.1186/2194-7511-1-5
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify and describe correlates of medication adherence in a large, national sample of outpatients with bipolar disorder. Data were collected via a self-report, Web-based survey in January and February of 2008 from US patients aged 18-65 years who reported a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and current use of psychotropic medication. Patients with a Composite International Diagnostic Interview-bipolar disorder (CIDI-bipolar disorder) score ≥ 7, indicating a high risk of bipolar disorder, were included in the analyses. Medication adherence was assessed via the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, with scores ≥ 2 being considered nonadherent. The primary analysis was a multivariate binomial logistic regression with adherence as the dependent variable. Covariates included patient demographics, physical health measures including Medical Outcomes Study 8-item Short-Form Health Survey physical summary score, number of manic and depressive episodes, 24-item Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24), Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side-Effect Rating Scale (LUNSERS), Satisfaction With Antipsychotic Medication scale (SWAM), and current psychiatric medication use. Nearly half (49.5%) of the 1,052 bipolar patients in the analysis were classified as being nonadherent. Adherence was positively associated with college degree, higher SWAM total score, and monotherapy treatment. Adherence was negatively associated with female sex, alcohol use, BASIS-24 total score, and LUNSERS total score. Nonadherence is common among patients with bipolar disorder. By addressing tolerability issues and treatment satisfaction, which are both significant correlates of adherence, health care providers may be able to improve adherence and, ultimately, treatment outcomes.
    The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 01/2010; 12(5). DOI:10.4088/PCC.09m00883yel
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used to treat both anxiety disorders and depressive disorders. However, nonadherence to SSRIs is a major issue in recurrence. In the present study, we investigated paroxetine adherence in depressed patients by monitoring the plasma paroxetine concentrations between patients with rapid and those with a late response to paroxetine treatment. Twenty inpatients in our university hospital, who met the DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of major depressive disorder in a single episode, were enrolled in the study. Twelve patients (M/F: 7/13, age: 37.4 +/- 10.4 years) were treated with paroxetine (40 mg/day), and all achieved remission (HAMD < or = 7) within at least 12 weeks. We divided the patients into two groups, an early-remission group (HAMD < or = 7 within 4 weeks) and a late-remission group (HAMD < or = 7 within 8-12 weeks). Their dosages of paroxetine were constant because of no emerging adverse effects. Blood samples were obtained on the day the subjects were discharged (B) and 12 weeks after discharge. The paroxetine concentrations in the early-remission group were significantly decreased 12 weeks after discharge, and no difference was found between the early- and late-remission groups. These results suggest that adherence to paroxetine was independent of the duration of the depressive state suffered by the patients. Clinicians always take their cautions for the adherence to paroxetine regardless of the clinical time courses the patients recovering from their depressive symptoms.
    Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental 08/2010; 25(6):487-90. DOI:10.1002/hup.1136 · 2.19 Impact Factor
Show more