"We'll do this together": the role of the first person plural in fostering partnership in patient-physician relationships.

Johns Hopkins University, 2024 East Monument Street, Room 2-521, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 03/2010; 25(3):186-93. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1178-3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Partnership is integral to therapeutic relationships, yet few studies have examined partnership-fostering communication behaviors in the clinic setting. We conducted this study to better understand how statements in which physicians use the first person plural might foster partnership between patient and provider.
We audio-recorded encounters between 45 HIV providers and 418 patients in the Enhancing Communication and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Study. We used the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) to code for statements made by the physician that used the first person plural to refer to themselves and their patient. Using multiple logistic regression, we examined the associations between the occurrence of one or more first person plural statements with patient ratings of provider communication. To better understand the meaning of first person plural statements, we conducted a qualitative analysis.
Providers were mostly white (69%) and Asian (24%); 57% were female. Patients were black (60%), white (25%), and Hispanic (15%); 33% were female. One or more first person plural statements occurred in 92/418 (22%) of encounters. In adjusted analyses, encounters with first person plural statements were associated with younger patient age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99), higher patient depression scores (highest tertile compared to lowest tertile: OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.01-3.51), the patient not being on anti-retroviral therapy (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.93), and older provider age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.09). After adjustment, patients were less likely to highly rate their provider's communication style if first person plural statements were used (AOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.96). There were 167 first person plural statements made by physicians in the 418 encounters. Qualitative analysis revealed that many first person plural features had at least one negative feature such as being overtly persuasive ("That's going to be our goal"), indirect ("What can we do to improve your diet?"), or ambiguous ("Let's see what we can do"), although there were also positive statements that involved patients in the health-care process, contributed to a mutual understanding, and addressed the patients' goals.
Contrary to our hypotheses, use of first person plural was not associated with higher ratings of provider communication, probably because some of these statements were overtly persuasive, indirect, or ambiguous. Physicians should become aware of benefits and pitfalls of using the first person plural with patients. Further research is needed to determine the most effective methods through which providers can build alliances with patients.

Download full-text


Available from: Todd Philip Korthuis, Jul 05, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Motivational interviewing (MI) can promote behavior change, but HIV care providers rarely have training in MI. Little is known about the use of MI-consistent behavior among untrained providers. This study examines the prevalence of such behaviors and their association with patient intentions to reduce high-risk sexual behavior. METHODS: Audio-recorded visits between HIV-infected patients and their healthcare providers were searched for counseling dialog regarding sexual behavior. The association of providers' MI-consistence with patients' statements about behavior change was assessed. RESULTS: Of 417 total encounters, 27 met inclusion criteria. The odds of patient commitment to change were higher when providers used more reflections (p=0.017), used more MI consistent utterances (p=0.044), demonstrated more empathy (p=0.049), and spent more time discussing sexual behavior (p=0.023). Patients gave more statements in favor of change (change talk) when providers used more reflections (p<0.001) and more empathy (p<0.001), even after adjusting for length of relevant dialog. CONCLUSION: Untrained HIV providers do not consistently use MI techniques when counseling patients about sexual risk reduction. However, when they do, their patients are more likely to express intentions to reduce sexual risk behavior. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: MI holds promise as one strategy to reduce transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.
    Patient Education and Counseling 05/2013; 93(1). DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.001 · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to examine linguistic expressions of power during dementia diagnosis disclosure. Videotapes of dementia diagnosis disclosure sessions were reviewed to examine linguistic features of 86 physician-patient-companion triads. Verbal dominance and pronoun use were measured as indications of power. Physicians dominated the conversation, speaking 83% of the total time. Patients spoke more than companions (10% versus 6%). Dementia status was only related to the amount of time companions spent talking. Physicians used fewer first person singular and more first person plural pronouns than patients and companions. Power indices did not predict anxiety, depression, or satisfaction with the medical visit. During the disclosure of a dementia diagnosis, physicians tend to dominate the conversation, exerting their social status through a variety of linguistic features. Patients and companions are not more distressed or dissatisfied as a result and exert their own subtle attempts to assert their role in the conversation. Recognition of a hierarchical structure within healthcare interactions may be the first step toward maximizing patient outcomes. Evaluating patient expectations and preferences regarding physician communication style may be the most effective way of promoting patient-centered healthcare communication.
    Patient Education and Counseling 10/2010; 85(2):295-8. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.020 · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To develop methods to reliably capture structural and dynamic temporal features of clinical interactions. METHODS: Observational study of 50 audio-recorded routine outpatient visits to HIV specialty clinics, using innovative analytic methods. The Comprehensive Analysis of the Structure of Encounters System (CASES) uses transcripts coded for speech acts, then imposes larger-scale structural elements: threads - the problems or issues addressed; and processes within threads - basic tasks of clinical care labeled Presentation, Information, Resolution (decision making) and Engagement (interpersonal exchange). Threads are also coded for the nature of resolution. RESULTS: 61% of utterances are in presentation processes. Provider verbal dominance is greatest in information and resolution processes, which also contain a high proportion of provider directives. About half of threads result in no action or decision. Information flows predominantly from patient to provider in presentation processes, and from provider to patient in information processes. Engagement is rare. CONCLUSIONS: In this data, resolution is provider centered; more time for patient participation in resolution, or interpersonal engagement, would have to come from presentation. Practice implications: Awareness of the use of time in clinical encounters, and the interaction processes associated with various tasks, may help make clinical communication more efficient and effective.
    Patient Education and Counseling 02/2013; 91(2). DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2012.12.012 · 2.60 Impact Factor